BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Subject: [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 07/18] bpf: Add bpf_rbtree_{lock,unlock} helpers
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:27:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220830172759.4069786-8-davemarchevsky@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220830172759.4069786-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com>

These helpers are equivalent to bpf_spin_{lock,unlock}, but the verifier
doesn't try to enforce that no helper calls occur when there's an active
spin lock.

[ TODO: Currently the verifier doesn't do _anything_ spinlock related
when it sees one of these, including setting active_spin_lock. This is
probably too lenient. Also, EXPORT_SYMBOL for internal lock helpers
might not be the best code structure. ]

Future patches will add enforcement of "rbtree helpers must always be
called when lock is held" constraint.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c           | 12 ++++++++++--
 kernel/bpf/rbtree.c            | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c          |  2 ++
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 06d71207de0b..f4c615fbf64f 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -5415,6 +5415,24 @@ union bpf_attr {
  *
  *	Return
  *		Ptr to lock
+ *
+ * void *bpf_rbtree_lock(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
+ *	Description
+ *		Like bpf_spin_lock helper, but use separate helper for now
+ *		as we don't want this helper to have special meaning to the verifier
+ *		so that we can do rbtree helper calls between rbtree_lock/unlock
+ *
+ *	Return
+ *		0
+ *
+ * void *bpf_rbtree_unlock(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
+ *	Description
+ *		Like bpf_spin_unlock helper, but use separate helper for now
+ *		as we don't want this helper to have special meaning to the verifier
+ *		so that we can do rbtree helper calls between rbtree_lock/unlock
+ *
+ *	Return
+ *		0
  */
 #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)		\
 	FN(unspec),			\
@@ -5632,6 +5650,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
 	FN(rbtree_remove),		\
 	FN(rbtree_free_node),		\
 	FN(rbtree_get_lock),		\
+	FN(rbtree_lock),		\
+	FN(rbtree_unlock),		\
 	/* */
 
 /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index ae974d0aa70d..0ca5fed1013b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static inline void __bpf_spin_unlock(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, irqsave_flags);
 
-static inline void __bpf_spin_lock_irqsave(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
+inline void __bpf_spin_lock_irqsave(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -324,6 +324,7 @@ static inline void __bpf_spin_lock_irqsave(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
 	__bpf_spin_lock(lock);
 	__this_cpu_write(irqsave_flags, flags);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bpf_spin_lock_irqsave);
 
 notrace BPF_CALL_1(bpf_spin_lock, struct bpf_spin_lock *, lock)
 {
@@ -338,7 +339,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_spin_lock_proto = {
 	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_SPIN_LOCK,
 };
 
-static inline void __bpf_spin_unlock_irqrestore(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
+inline void __bpf_spin_unlock_irqrestore(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -346,6 +347,7 @@ static inline void __bpf_spin_unlock_irqrestore(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
 	__bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bpf_spin_unlock_irqrestore);
 
 notrace BPF_CALL_1(bpf_spin_unlock, struct bpf_spin_lock *, lock)
 {
@@ -1604,6 +1606,8 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_rbtree_find_proto __weak;
 const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_rbtree_remove_proto __weak;
 const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_rbtree_free_node_proto __weak;
 const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_rbtree_get_lock_proto __weak;
+const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_rbtree_lock_proto __weak;
+const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_rbtree_unlock_proto __weak;
 
 const struct bpf_func_proto *
 bpf_base_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
@@ -1707,6 +1711,10 @@ bpf_base_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
 		return &bpf_rbtree_free_node_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_rbtree_get_lock:
 		return &bpf_rbtree_get_lock_proto;
+	case BPF_FUNC_rbtree_lock:
+		return &bpf_rbtree_lock_proto;
+	case BPF_FUNC_rbtree_unlock:
+		return &bpf_rbtree_unlock_proto;
 	default:
 		break;
 	}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/rbtree.c b/kernel/bpf/rbtree.c
index 0cc495b7cb26..641821ee1a7f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/rbtree.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/rbtree.c
@@ -262,6 +262,35 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_rbtree_get_lock_proto = {
 	.arg1_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
 };
 
+extern void __bpf_spin_unlock_irqrestore(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock);
+extern void __bpf_spin_lock_irqsave(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock);
+
+BPF_CALL_1(bpf_rbtree_lock, void *, lock)
+{
+	__bpf_spin_lock_irqsave((struct bpf_spin_lock *)lock);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_rbtree_lock_proto = {
+	.func = bpf_rbtree_lock,
+	.gpl_only = true,
+	.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
+	.arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_SPIN_LOCK,
+};
+
+BPF_CALL_1(bpf_rbtree_unlock, void *, lock)
+{
+	__bpf_spin_unlock_irqrestore((struct bpf_spin_lock *)lock);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_rbtree_unlock_proto = {
+	.func = bpf_rbtree_unlock,
+	.gpl_only = true,
+	.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
+	.arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_SPIN_LOCK,
+};
+
 BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_rbtree_map_btf_ids, struct, bpf_rbtree)
 const struct bpf_map_ops rbtree_map_ops = {
 	.map_meta_equal = bpf_map_meta_equal,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 0a2e958ddca8..b9e5d87fe323 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6057,6 +6057,8 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
 		} else if (meta->func_id == BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock) {
 			if (process_spin_lock(env, regno, false))
 				return -EACCES;
+		} else if (meta->func_id == BPF_FUNC_rbtree_lock ||
+			   meta->func_id == BPF_FUNC_rbtree_unlock) { // Do nothing for now
 		} else {
 			verbose(env, "verifier internal error\n");
 			return -EFAULT;
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 06d71207de0b..f4c615fbf64f 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -5415,6 +5415,24 @@ union bpf_attr {
  *
  *	Return
  *		Ptr to lock
+ *
+ * void *bpf_rbtree_lock(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
+ *	Description
+ *		Like bpf_spin_lock helper, but use separate helper for now
+ *		as we don't want this helper to have special meaning to the verifier
+ *		so that we can do rbtree helper calls between rbtree_lock/unlock
+ *
+ *	Return
+ *		0
+ *
+ * void *bpf_rbtree_unlock(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
+ *	Description
+ *		Like bpf_spin_unlock helper, but use separate helper for now
+ *		as we don't want this helper to have special meaning to the verifier
+ *		so that we can do rbtree helper calls between rbtree_lock/unlock
+ *
+ *	Return
+ *		0
  */
 #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)		\
 	FN(unspec),			\
@@ -5632,6 +5650,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
 	FN(rbtree_remove),		\
 	FN(rbtree_free_node),		\
 	FN(rbtree_get_lock),		\
+	FN(rbtree_lock),		\
+	FN(rbtree_unlock),		\
 	/* */
 
 /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-30 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-30 17:27 [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 00/18] bpf: Introduce rbtree map Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 01/18] bpf: Add verifier support for custom callback return range Dave Marchevsky
2022-09-01 21:01   ` Joanne Koong
2022-09-06 23:42     ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-09-07  1:53       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-08 21:36         ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-09-08 21:40           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-08 23:10             ` Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 02/18] bpf: Add verifier check for BPF_PTR_POISON retval and arg Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 03/18] bpf: Add rb_node_off to bpf_map Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 04/18] bpf: Add rbtree map Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 05/18] libbpf: Add support for private BSS map section Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 06/18] bpf: Add bpf_spin_lock member to rbtree Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` Dave Marchevsky [this message]
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 08/18] bpf: Enforce spinlock hold for bpf_rbtree_{add,remove,find} Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 09/18] bpf: Support declarative association of lock with rbtree map Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 10/18] bpf: Verifier tracking of rbtree_spin_lock held Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 11/18] bpf: Check rbtree lock held during verification Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 12/18] bpf: Add OBJ_NON_OWNING_REF type flag Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 13/18] bpf: Add CONDITIONAL_RELEASE " Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 14/18] bpf: Introduce PTR_ITER and PTR_ITER_END type flags Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 15/18] selftests/bpf: Add rbtree map tests Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 16/18] selftests/bpf: Declarative lock definition test changes Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 17/18] selftests/bpf: Lock tracking " Dave Marchevsky
2022-08-30 17:27 ` [RFCv2 PATCH bpf-next 18/18] selftests/bpf: Rbtree static lock verification " Dave Marchevsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220830172759.4069786-8-davemarchevsky@fb.com \
    --to=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox