From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@google.com>,
"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Move bpf_dispatcher function out of ftrace locations
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 15:41:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220901134150.418203-3-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220901134150.418203-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
The dispatcher function is attached/detached to trampoline by
dispatcher update function. At the same time it's available as
ftrace attachable function.
After discussion [1] the proposed solution is to use compiler
attributes to alter bpf_dispatcher_##name##_func function:
- remove it from being instrumented with __no_instrument_function__
attribute, so ftrace has no track of it
- but still generate 5 nop instructions with patchable_function_entry(5)
attribute, which are expected by bpf_arch_text_poke used by
dispatcher update function
Enabling HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_NO_PATCHABLE option for x86, so
__patchable_function_entries functions are not part of ftrace/mcount
locations.
Adding attributes to bpf_dispatcher_XXX function on x86_64 so it's
kept out of ftrace locations and has 5 byte nop generated at entry.
These attributes need to be arch specific as pointer out by Ilya
Leoshkevic in here [2].
The dispatcher image is generated only for x86_64 arch, so the
code can stay as is for other archs.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220722110811.124515-1-jolsa@kernel.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/969a14281a7791c334d476825863ee449964dd0c.camel@linux.ibm.com/
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
include/linux/bpf.h | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index f9920f1341c8..089c20cefd2b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ config X86
select PROC_PID_ARCH_STATUS if PROC_FS
select HAVE_ARCH_NODE_DEV_GROUP if X86_SGX
imply IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT if EFI
+ select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_NO_PATCHABLE
config INSTRUCTION_DECODER
def_bool y
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 9c1674973e03..4ab4b0a1beb8 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -924,7 +924,15 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher(void *image, s64 *funcs, int num_funcs);
}, \
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+#define BPF_DISPATCHER_ATTRIBUTES __attribute__((__no_instrument_function__)) \
+ __attribute__((patchable_function_entry(5)))
+#else
+#define BPF_DISPATCHER_ATTRIBUTES
+#endif
+
#define DEFINE_BPF_DISPATCHER(name) \
+ BPF_DISPATCHER_ATTRIBUTES \
noinline __nocfi unsigned int bpf_dispatcher_##name##_func( \
const void *ctx, \
const struct bpf_insn *insnsi, \
--
2.37.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-01 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-01 13:41 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/2] bpf,ftrace: bpf dispatcher function fix Jiri Olsa
2022-09-01 13:41 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/2] ftrace: Add HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_NO_PATCHABLE Jiri Olsa
2022-09-01 13:41 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2022-09-02 11:14 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Move bpf_dispatcher function out of ftrace locations Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-02 16:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-02 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-03 13:11 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220901134150.418203-3-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox