From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 60/77] selftests/bpf: Free the allocated resources after test case succeeds
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 18:07:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221009220754.1214186-60-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221009220754.1214186-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
[ Upstream commit 103d002fb7d548fb1187e350f2b73788558128b9 ]
Free the created fd or allocated bpf_object after test case succeeds,
else there will be resource leaks.
Spotted by using address sanitizer and checking the content of
/proc/$pid/fd directory.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921070035.2016413-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
.../bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c | 2 ++
.../bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c | 2 ++
.../bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_batch_ops.c | 2 ++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 24 ++++++++++++-------
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c
index 78c76496b14a..b595556315bc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <string.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
@@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ static void __test_map_lookup_and_update_batch(bool is_pcpu)
free(keys);
free(values);
free(visited);
+ close(map_fd);
}
static void array_map_batch_ops(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c
index f807d53fd8dd..1230ccf90128 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <string.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
@@ -255,6 +256,7 @@ void __test_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(bool is_pcpu)
free(visited);
if (!is_pcpu)
free(values);
+ close(map_fd);
}
void htab_map_batch_ops(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_batch_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_batch_ops.c
index 87d07b596e17..b66d56ddb7ef 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_batch_ops.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_batch_ops.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <errno.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
@@ -150,4 +151,5 @@ void test_lpm_trie_map_batch_ops(void)
free(keys);
free(values);
free(visited);
+ close(map_fd);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index cbebfaa7c1e8..4d42ffea0038 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -658,13 +658,13 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
{
struct bpf_map *bpf_map_rx, *bpf_map_tx, *bpf_map_msg, *bpf_map_break;
int map_fd_msg = 0, map_fd_rx = 0, map_fd_tx = 0, map_fd_break;
+ struct bpf_object *parse_obj, *verdict_obj, *msg_obj;
int ports[] = {50200, 50201, 50202, 50204};
int err, i, fd, udp, sfd[6] = {0xdeadbeef};
u8 buf[20] = {0x0, 0x5, 0x3, 0x2, 0x1, 0x0};
int parse_prog, verdict_prog, msg_prog;
struct sockaddr_in addr;
int one = 1, s, sc, rc;
- struct bpf_object *obj;
struct timeval to;
__u32 key, value;
pid_t pid[tasks];
@@ -760,6 +760,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
i, udp);
goto out_sockmap;
}
+ close(udp);
/* Test update without programs */
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
@@ -822,27 +823,27 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
/* Load SK_SKB program and Attach */
err = bpf_prog_test_load(SOCKMAP_PARSE_PROG,
- BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, &obj, &parse_prog);
+ BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, &parse_obj, &parse_prog);
if (err) {
printf("Failed to load SK_SKB parse prog\n");
goto out_sockmap;
}
err = bpf_prog_test_load(SOCKMAP_TCP_MSG_PROG,
- BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, &obj, &msg_prog);
+ BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG, &msg_obj, &msg_prog);
if (err) {
printf("Failed to load SK_SKB msg prog\n");
goto out_sockmap;
}
err = bpf_prog_test_load(SOCKMAP_VERDICT_PROG,
- BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, &obj, &verdict_prog);
+ BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, &verdict_obj, &verdict_prog);
if (err) {
printf("Failed to load SK_SKB verdict prog\n");
goto out_sockmap;
}
- bpf_map_rx = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "sock_map_rx");
+ bpf_map_rx = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(verdict_obj, "sock_map_rx");
if (!bpf_map_rx) {
printf("Failed to load map rx from verdict prog\n");
goto out_sockmap;
@@ -854,7 +855,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
goto out_sockmap;
}
- bpf_map_tx = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "sock_map_tx");
+ bpf_map_tx = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(verdict_obj, "sock_map_tx");
if (!bpf_map_tx) {
printf("Failed to load map tx from verdict prog\n");
goto out_sockmap;
@@ -866,7 +867,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
goto out_sockmap;
}
- bpf_map_msg = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "sock_map_msg");
+ bpf_map_msg = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(verdict_obj, "sock_map_msg");
if (!bpf_map_msg) {
printf("Failed to load map msg from msg_verdict prog\n");
goto out_sockmap;
@@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
goto out_sockmap;
}
- bpf_map_break = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "sock_map_break");
+ bpf_map_break = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(verdict_obj, "sock_map_break");
if (!bpf_map_break) {
printf("Failed to load map tx from verdict prog\n");
goto out_sockmap;
@@ -1124,7 +1125,9 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data)
}
close(fd);
close(map_fd_rx);
- bpf_object__close(obj);
+ bpf_object__close(parse_obj);
+ bpf_object__close(msg_obj);
+ bpf_object__close(verdict_obj);
return;
out:
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
@@ -1282,8 +1285,11 @@ static void test_map_in_map(void)
printf("Inner map mim.inner was not destroyed\n");
goto out_map_in_map;
}
+
+ close(fd);
}
+ bpf_object__close(obj);
return;
out_map_in_map:
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-09 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-09 22:06 [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 01/77] libbpf: Ensure functions with always_inline attribute are inline Sasha Levin
2022-10-09 22:06 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 02/77] libbpf: Do not require executable permission for shared libraries Sasha Levin
2022-10-09 22:06 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 06/77] bpftool: Clear errno after libcap's checks Sasha Levin
2022-10-09 22:07 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2022-10-09 22:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 68/77] net: If sock is dead don't access sock's sk_wq in sk_stream_wait_memory Sasha Levin
2022-10-09 22:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 69/77] bpf: Adjust kprobe_multi entry_ip for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Sasha Levin
2022-10-09 22:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 70/77] bpf: use bpf_prog_pack for bpf_dispatcher Sasha Levin
2022-10-09 22:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 73/77] libbpf: Fix overrun in netlink attribute iteration Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221009220754.1214186-60-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox