Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] bpf: Implement cgroup storage available to non-cgroup-attached bpf progs

Yonghong Song
2022-10-17T20:44:57Z

On 10/17/22 1:14 PM, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 1:10 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@meta.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/17/22 11:25 AM, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:02 AM <sdf@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/13, Yonghong Song wrote:
>>>>> Similar to sk/inode/task storage, implement similar cgroup local storage.
>>>>
>>>>> There already exists a local storage implementation for cgroup-attached
>>>>> bpf programs. See map type BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_STORAGE and helper
>>>>> bpf_get_local_storage(). But there are use cases such that non-cgroup
>>>>> attached bpf progs wants to access cgroup local storage data. For example,
>>>>> tc egress prog has access to sk and cgroup. It is possible to use
>>>>> sk local storage to emulate cgroup local storage by storing data in
>>>>> socket.
>>>>> But this is a waste as it could be lots of sockets belonging to a
>>>>> particular
>>>>> cgroup. Alternatively, a separate map can be created with cgroup id as
>>>>> the key.
>>>>> But this will introduce additional overhead to manipulate the new map.
>>>>> A cgroup local storage, similar to existing sk/inode/task storage,
>>>>> should help for this use case.
>>>>
>>>>> The life-cycle of storage is managed with the life-cycle of the
>>>>> cgroup struct. i.e. the storage is destroyed along with the owning cgroup
>>>>> with a callback to the bpf_cgroup_storage_free when cgroup itself
>>>>> is deleted.
>>>>
>>>>> The userspace map operations can be done by using a cgroup fd as a key
>>>>> passed to the lookup, update and delete operations.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>>> Since map name BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_STORAGE has been used for old cgroup
>>>>> local
>>>>> storage support, the new map name BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_LOCAL_STORAGE is
>>>>> used
>>>>> for cgroup storage available to non-cgroup-attached bpf programs. The two
>>>>> helpers are named as bpf_cgroup_local_storage_get() and
>>>>> bpf_cgroup_local_storage_delete().
>>>>
>>>> Have you considered doing something similar to 7d9c3427894f ("bpf: Make
>>>> cgroup storages shared between programs on the same cgroup") where
>>>> the map changes its behavior depending on the key size (see key_size checks
>>>> in cgroup_storage_map_alloc)? Looks like sizeof(int) for fd still
>>>> can be used so we can, in theory, reuse the name..
>>>>
>>>> Pros:
>>>> - no need for a new map name
>>>>
>>>> Cons:
>>>> - existing BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_STORAGE is already messy; might be not a
>>>> good idea to add more stuff to it?
>>>>
>>>> But, for the very least, should we also extend
>>>> Documentation/bpf/map_cgroup_storage.rst to cover the new map? We've
>>>> tried to keep some of the important details in there..
>>>
>>> This might be a long shot, but is it possible to switch completely to
>>> this new generic cgroup storage, and for programs that attach to
>>> cgroups we can still do lookups/allocations during attachment like we
>>> do today? IOW, maintain the current API for cgroup progs but switch it
>>> to use this new map type instead.
>>
>> Right, cgroup attach/detach should not be impacted by this patch.
>>
>>>
>>> It feels like this map type is more generic and can be a superset of
>>> the existing cgroup storage, but I feel like I am missing something.
>>
>> One difference is old way cgroup local storage allocates the memory
>> at map creation time, and the new way allocates the memory at runtime
>> when get/update helper is called.
>>
>
> IIUC the old cgroup local storage allocates memory when a program is
> attached.

Ya, meta data memory is allocated in map creation time but real storage
is allocated at attach time.

> We can have the same behavior with the new map type, right?
> When a program is attached to a cgroup, allocate the memory, otherwise
> it is allocated at run time. Does this make sense?

I would like to keep the new functionality flexible so that
even if a program attaching to a cgroup it can still access
other cgroup local storage.

>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> include/linux/bpf.h | 3 +
>>>>> include/linux/bpf_types.h | 1 +
>>>>> include/linux/cgroup-defs.h | 4 +
>>>>> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 39 +++++
>>>>> kernel/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
>>>>> kernel/bpf/bpf_cgroup_storage.c | 280 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 6 +
>>>>> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 3 +-
>>>>> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 14 +-
>>>>> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 4 +
>>>>> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 +
>>>>> scripts/bpf_doc.py | 2 +
>>>>> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 39 +++++
>>>>> 13 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>> create mode 100644 kernel/bpf/bpf_cgroup_storage.c
>>>> …