From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/13] bpf: Rename confusingly named RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 19:29:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221018135920.726360-4-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221018135920.726360-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Currently, the verifier has two return types, RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM, and
RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL, however the former is confusingly named to
imply that it carries MEM_ALLOC, while only the latter does. This causes
confusion during code review leading to conclusions like that the return
value of RET_PTR_TO_DYNPTR_MEM_OR_NULL (which is RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM |
PTR_MAYBE_NULL) may be consumable by bpf_ringbuf_{submit,commit}.
Rename it to make it clear MEM_ALLOC needs to be tacked on top of
RET_PTR_TO_MEM.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 6 +++---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 13c6ff2de540..834276ba56c9 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ enum bpf_return_type {
RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET, /* returns a pointer to a socket */
RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK, /* returns a pointer to a tcp_sock */
RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON, /* returns a pointer to a sock_common */
- RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM, /* returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory */
+ RET_PTR_TO_MEM, /* returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory */
RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID, /* returns a pointer to a valid memory or a btf_id */
RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID, /* returns a pointer to a btf_id */
__BPF_RET_TYPE_MAX,
@@ -548,8 +548,8 @@ enum bpf_return_type {
RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET,
RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK,
RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON,
- RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_ALLOC | RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM,
- RET_PTR_TO_DYNPTR_MEM_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM,
+ RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_ALLOC | RET_PTR_TO_MEM,
+ RET_PTR_TO_DYNPTR_MEM_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_MEM,
RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
/* This must be the last entry. Its purpose is to ensure the enum is
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 87d9cccd1623..a49b95c1af1b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7612,7 +7612,7 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK | ret_flag;
break;
- case RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM:
+ case RET_PTR_TO_MEM:
mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MEM | ret_flag;
regs[BPF_REG_0].mem_size = meta.mem_size;
--
2.38.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-18 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 13:59 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/13] Fixes for dynptr Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-18 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/13] bpf: Refactor ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR checks into process_dynptr_func Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-18 19:45 ` David Vernet
2022-10-19 6:04 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-19 15:26 ` David Vernet
2022-10-19 22:59 ` Joanne Koong
2022-10-20 0:55 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-18 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/13] bpf: Rework process_dynptr_func Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-18 23:16 ` David Vernet
2022-10-19 6:18 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-19 16:05 ` David Vernet
2022-10-20 1:09 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-18 13:59 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2022-10-18 21:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/13] bpf: Rename confusingly named RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM sdf
2022-10-19 6:19 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 22:35 ` Joanne Koong
2022-11-07 23:12 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-18 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/13] bpf: Rework check_func_arg_reg_off Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-18 21:55 ` sdf
2022-10-19 6:24 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-07 23:17 ` Joanne Koong
2022-11-08 18:22 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-18 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/13] bpf: Fix state pruning for STACK_DYNPTR stack slots Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-08 20:22 ` Joanne Koong
2022-11-09 18:39 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-10 0:41 ` Joanne Koong
2022-10-18 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/13] bpf: Fix missing var_off check for ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-19 18:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-20 1:04 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-20 2:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-20 2:40 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-20 2:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-20 3:23 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-21 0:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-10-21 1:53 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-18 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/13] bpf: Fix partial dynptr stack slot reads/writes Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-21 22:50 ` Joanne Koong
2022-10-21 22:57 ` Joanne Koong
2022-10-22 4:08 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-03 14:07 ` Joanne Koong
2022-11-04 22:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-04 23:02 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-04 23:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-18 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/13] bpf: Use memmove for bpf_dynptr_{read,write} Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-21 18:12 ` Joanne Koong
2022-10-18 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/13] selftests/bpf: Add test for dynptr reinit in user_ringbuf callback Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-19 16:59 ` David Vernet
2022-10-18 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/13] selftests/bpf: Add dynptr pruning tests Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-18 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add dynptr var_off tests Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-18 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add dynptr partial slot overwrite tests Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-10-18 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 13/13] selftests/bpf: Add dynptr helper tests Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-10-31 7:05 ` CVE-2023-39191 - Dynptr fixes - reg Nandhini Rengaraj
2023-10-31 7:13 ` Greg KH
2023-10-31 7:57 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221018135920.726360-4-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox