public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: 'Alexei Starovoitov ' <ast@kernel.org>,
	'Andrii Nakryiko ' <andrii@kernel.org>,
	'Daniel Borkmann ' <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	'Song Liu ' <songliubraving@meta.com>,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/9] bpf: Avoid unnecessary deadlock detection and failure in task storage
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:45:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221025184524.3526117-1-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)

From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

The commit bc235cdb423a ("bpf: Prevent deadlock from recursive bpf_task_storage_[get|delete]")
added deadlock detection to avoid a tracing program from recurring
on the bpf_task_storage_{get,delete}() helpers.  These helpers acquire
a spin lock and it will lead to deadlock.

It is unnecessary for the bpf_lsm and bpf_iter programs which do
not recur.  The situation is the same as the existing
bpf_pid_task_storage_{lookup,delete}_elem() which are
used in the syscall and they also do not have deadlock detection.

This set is to add new bpf_task_storage_{get,delete}() helper proto
without the deadlock detection.  The set also removes the prog->active
check from the bpf_lsm and bpf_iter program.  Please see the individual
patch for details.

Martin KaFai Lau (9):
  bpf: Remove prog->active check for bpf_lsm and bpf_iter
  bpf: Append _recur naming to the bpf_task_storage helper proto
  bpf: Refactor the core bpf_task_storage_get logic into a new function
  bpf: Avoid taking spinlock in bpf_task_storage_get if potential
    deadlock is detected
  bpf: Add new bpf_task_storage_get proto with no deadlock detection
  bpf: bpf_task_storage_delete_recur does lookup first before the
    deadlock check
  bpf: Add new bpf_task_storage_delete proto with no deadlock detection
  selftests/bpf: Ensure no task storage failure for bpf_lsm.s prog due
    to deadlock detection
  selftests/bpf: Tracing prog can still do lookup under busy lock

 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                 |   9 +-
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                   |  19 +--
 include/linux/bpf.h                           |  26 ++--
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h                  |  15 +-
 kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c                |   1 +
 kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c                 | 119 +++++++++++---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          |   5 +-
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c                       |  80 ++++++++--
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c                      |   5 +
 .../bpf/prog_tests/task_local_storage.c       | 146 +++++++++++++++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_recursion.c   |  43 +++++-
 .../bpf/progs/task_storage_nodeadlock.c       |  47 ++++++
 12 files changed, 431 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_storage_nodeadlock.c

-- 
2.30.2


             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-25 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-25 18:45 Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2022-10-25 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/9] bpf: Remove prog->active check for bpf_lsm and bpf_iter Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-25 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/9] bpf: Append _recur naming to the bpf_task_storage helper proto Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-25 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/9] bpf: Refactor the core bpf_task_storage_get logic into a new function Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-25 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/9] bpf: Avoid taking spinlock in bpf_task_storage_get if potential deadlock is detected Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-25 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/9] bpf: Add new bpf_task_storage_get proto with no deadlock detection Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-25 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/9] bpf: bpf_task_storage_delete_recur does lookup first before the deadlock check Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-25 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/9] bpf: Add new bpf_task_storage_delete proto with no deadlock detection Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-25 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: Ensure no task storage failure for bpf_lsm.s prog due to " Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-25 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: Tracing prog can still do lookup under busy lock Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-26  6:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/9] bpf: Avoid unnecessary deadlock detection and failure in task storage patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221025184524.3526117-1-martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@meta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox