From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@meta.com>,
Delyan Kratunov <delyank@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/24] bpf: Allow specifying volatile type modifier for kptrs
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 01:56:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221102202658.963008-3-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102202658.963008-1-memxor@gmail.com>
This is useful in particular to mark the pointer as volatile, so that
compiler treats each load and store to the field as a volatile access.
The alternative is having to define and use READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE in
the BPF program.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/btf.h | 5 +++++
kernel/bpf/btf.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index f9aababc5d78..86aad9b2ce02 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -288,6 +288,11 @@ static inline bool btf_type_is_typedef(const struct btf_type *t)
return BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF;
}
+static inline bool btf_type_is_volatile(const struct btf_type *t)
+{
+ return BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_VOLATILE;
+}
+
static inline bool btf_type_is_func(const struct btf_type *t)
{
return BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) == BTF_KIND_FUNC;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index eba603cec2c5..ad301e78f7ee 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -3225,6 +3225,9 @@ static int btf_find_kptr(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
enum bpf_kptr_type type;
u32 res_id;
+ /* Permit modifiers on the pointer itself */
+ if (btf_type_is_volatile(t))
+ t = btf_type_by_id(btf, t->type);
/* For PTR, sz is always == 8 */
if (!btf_type_is_ptr(t))
return BTF_FIELD_IGNORE;
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-02 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-02 20:26 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/24] Local kptrs, BPF linked lists Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/24] bpf: Document UAPI details for special BPF types Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/24] bpf: Clobber stack slot when writing over spilled PTR_TO_BTF_ID Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/24] bpf: Fix slot type check in check_stack_write_var_off Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/24] bpf: Drop reg_type_may_be_refcounted_or_null Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/24] bpf: Refactor kptr_off_tab into btf_record Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/24] bpf: Consolidate spin_lock, timer management " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/24] bpf: Refactor map->off_arr handling Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/24] bpf: Support bpf_list_head in map values Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/24] bpf: Introduce local kptrs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/24] bpf: Recognize bpf_{spin_lock,list_head,list_node} in " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/24] bpf: Verify ownership relationships for user BTF types Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/24] bpf: Support locking bpf_spin_lock in local kptr Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/24] bpf: Allow locking bpf_spin_lock global variables Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/24] bpf: Rewrite kfunc argument handling Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/24] bpf: Drop kfunc bits from btf_check_func_arg_match Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/24] bpf: Support constant scalar arguments for kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 18/24] bpf: Teach verifier about non-size constant arguments Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 19/24] bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 22:58 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-03 0:29 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 20/24] bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_drop Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 21/24] bpf: Permit NULL checking pointer with non-zero fixed offset Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 22/24] bpf: Introduce single ownership BPF linked list API Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 23/24] selftests/bpf: Add __contains macro to bpf_experimental.h Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-11-02 20:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 24/24] selftests/bpf: Add BPF linked list API tests Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221102202658.963008-3-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davemarchevsky@meta.com \
--cc=delyank@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox