From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com,
yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, shung-hsi.yu@suse.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] propagate nullness information for reg to reg comparisons
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 23:49:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221106214921.117631-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
This patchset adds ability to propagates nullness information for
branches of register to register equality compare instructions. The
following rules are used:
- suppose register A maybe null
- suppose register B is not null
- for JNE A, B, ... - A is not null in the false branch
- for JEQ A, B, ... - A is not null in the true branch
E.g. for program like below:
r6 = skb->sk;
r7 = sk_fullsock(r6);
r0 = sk_fullsock(r6);
if (r0 == 0) return 0; (a)
if (r0 != r7) return 0; (b)
*r7->type; (c)
return 0;
It is safe to dereference r7 at point (c), because of (a) and (b).
The utility of this change came up while working on BPF CLang backend
issue [1]. Specifically, while debugging issue with selftest
`test_sk_lookup.c`. This test has the following structure:
int access_ctx_sk(struct bpf_sk_lookup *ctx __CTX__)
{
struct bpf_sock *sk1 = NULL, *sk2 = NULL;
...
sk1 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&redir_map, &KEY_SERVER_A);
if (!sk1) // (a)
goto out;
...
if (ctx->sk != sk1) // (b)
goto out;
...
if (ctx->sk->family != AF_INET || // (c)
ctx->sk->type != SOCK_STREAM ||
ctx->sk->state != BPF_TCP_LISTEN)
goto out;
...
}
- at (a) `sk1` is checked to be not null;
- at (b) `ctx->sk` is verified to be equal to `sk1`;
- at (c) `ctx->sk` is accessed w/o nullness check.
Currently Global Value Numbering pass considers expressions `sk1` and
`ctx->sk` to be identical at point (c) and replaces `ctx->sk` with
`sk1` (not expressions themselves but corresponding SSA values).
Since `sk1` is known to be not null after (b) verifier allows
execution of the program.
However, such optimization is not guaranteed to happen. When it does
not happen verifier reports an error.
Changelog:
v1 -> v2:
- after investigation described in [2] as suggested by John, Daniel
and Shung-Hsi, function `type_is_pointer` is removed, calls to this
function are replaced by `__is_pointer_value(false, src_reg)`.
RFC -> v1:
- newly added if block in `check_cond_jmp_op` is moved down to keep
`make_ptr_not_null_reg` actions together;
- tests rewritten to have a single `r0 = 0; exit;` block.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D131633#3722231
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/bad8be826d088e0d180232628160bf932006de89.camel@gmail.com/
[v1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220826172915.1536914-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[RFC] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220822094312.175448-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
Eduard Zingerman (2):
bpf: propagate nullness information for reg to reg comparisons
selftests/bpf: check nullness propagation for reg to reg comparisons
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 35 +++-
.../bpf/verifier/jeq_infer_not_null.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jeq_infer_not_null.c
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-06 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-06 21:49 Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2022-11-06 21:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: propagate nullness information for reg to reg comparisons Eduard Zingerman
2022-11-06 21:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: check nullness propagation " Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221106214921.117631-1-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox