From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAEEC4332F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2022 21:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230143AbiKFVuH (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Nov 2022 16:50:07 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48492 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230137AbiKFVuF (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Nov 2022 16:50:05 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA2F4D86 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2022 13:50:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id j5-20020a05600c410500b003cfa9c0ea76so728928wmi.3 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 13:50:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=kq8aoON28koqCNeo73zTWENzgB0E9SDbVKaoTrqmW7U=; b=mlyj/M7Jdm32BOANViBSy5CLu9mEO6QdYRJxTl342W7B8tDYV0x7WEsAgIOdJum1Z5 oAmfjOkDhYQjQMxDwFNdpWHJUzC846uhjad8E4oh4uLQRkTwrHb8GnP2LBu/z6Wa3fUQ 8M1zPdHZuTZYUnkh+7j4X72LuYB6+yhf0EwvLFIxe/606zvazTIdThTQHwkKNN2zD/IR oTElBREVLJMuGOqy0x+Wxfar7FeCTyQ8aDPLVBmSbbO/nRDBIZH8wOnZTQkE2fVCRh/j uXE1zjYtPEoawmLZUtproiNYQsubeoOJVNYwuauH5ciEjReua5QI8aGiSlRBqA2GsigU HQIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kq8aoON28koqCNeo73zTWENzgB0E9SDbVKaoTrqmW7U=; b=LlKHY+GVB19wCR3rsm3VI+RxPI6/+6nN5oEIGa86qa8nbJfUFBCaGfLUMjK0ITXUvB 8sk3hyRqoVogBV0AkDgA1kgFQUA3BXTNl22HTe2EZt1N9hWlag/xR+G82T1TMIZ+ADgS ZJ+GLTHqXNE6r76pDtaGFdTonCbp5Jfau7vFEtLuzeAJUw5lKIWLI8eZFdcK8wzHzj2Q ejfe7/u9LHHy416wsyDk7+b5ObQOp4MZ8W1myhUHdnSXVLGTJhyHLWezXeu4T0nq2v8e iWCM+QpxoFwDuMufID6xIdoQYmuelXhIvl/eA1mEtxv09zMXUbdIppL35cz83NHDry7G YtBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2ARjQV3lmBfs6wNqnC9Jm8zYYgUqrSu6RGOUugBl8lgUfiJTiT jw8p2s7Sqq8lV44U4ShDFOmPTxBbIu4GDIen X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7AhDoefNtDGwrAe04waFFX9Fbog6reL+9yDgdcxNSYIEzW0mzAHjsWy/L+RijTXXUnmObcTw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f30d:0:b0:3c3:7c80:67f4 with SMTP id q13-20020a1cf30d000000b003c37c8067f4mr30980266wmq.86.1667771401159; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 13:50:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from pluto.. (boundsly.muster.volia.net. [93.72.16.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v128-20020a1cac86000000b003a3170a7af9sm6345326wme.4.2022.11.06.13.49.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 06 Nov 2022 13:50:00 -0800 (PST) From: Eduard Zingerman To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, shung-hsi.yu@suse.com, Eduard Zingerman Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: check nullness propagation for reg to reg comparisons Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 23:49:21 +0200 Message-Id: <20221106214921.117631-3-eddyz87@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20221106214921.117631-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> References: <20221106214921.117631-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Verify that nullness information is porpagated in the branches of register to register JEQ and JNE operations. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman Acked-by: Yonghong Song --- .../bpf/verifier/jeq_infer_not_null.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 166 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jeq_infer_not_null.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jeq_infer_not_null.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jeq_infer_not_null.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d73f6198d544 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jeq_infer_not_null.c @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +{ + /* This is equivalent to the following program: + * + * r6 = skb->sk; + * r7 = sk_fullsock(r6); + * r0 = sk_fullsock(r6); + * if (r0 == 0) return 0; (a) + * if (r0 != r7) return 0; (b) + * *r7->type; (c) + * return 0; + * + * It is safe to dereference r7 at point (c), because of (a) and (b). + * The test verifies that relation r0 == r7 is propagated from (b) to (c). + */ + "jne/jeq infer not null, PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL -> PTR_TO_SOCKET for JNE false branch", + .insns = { + /* r6 = skb->sk; */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)), + /* if (r6 == 0) return 0; */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_6, 0, 8), + /* r7 = sk_fullsock(skb); */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0), + /* r0 = sk_fullsock(skb); */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock), + /* if (r0 == null) return 0; */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2), + /* if (r0 == r7) r0 = *(r7->type); */ + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 1), /* Use ! JNE ! */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, type)), + /* return 0 */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + .result = ACCEPT, +}, +{ + /* Same as above, but verify that another branch of JNE still + * prohibits access to PTR_MAYBE_NULL. + */ + "jne/jeq infer not null, PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL unchanged for JNE true branch", + .insns = { + /* r6 = skb->sk */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)), + /* if (r6 == 0) return 0; */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_6, 0, 9), + /* r7 = sk_fullsock(skb); */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0), + /* r0 = sk_fullsock(skb); */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock), + /* if (r0 == null) return 0; */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3), + /* if (r0 == r7) return 0; */ + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 1), /* Use ! JNE ! */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + /* r0 = *(r7->type); */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, type)), + /* return 0 */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "R7 invalid mem access 'sock_or_null'", +}, +{ + /* Same as a first test, but not null should be inferred for JEQ branch */ + "jne/jeq infer not null, PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL -> PTR_TO_SOCKET for JEQ true branch", + .insns = { + /* r6 = skb->sk; */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)), + /* if (r6 == null) return 0; */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_6, 0, 9), + /* r7 = sk_fullsock(skb); */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0), + /* r0 = sk_fullsock(skb); */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock), + /* if (r0 == null) return 0; */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3), + /* if (r0 != r7) return 0; */ + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 1), /* Use ! JEQ ! */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + /* r0 = *(r7->type); */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, type)), + /* return 0; */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + .result = ACCEPT, +}, +{ + /* Same as above, but verify that another branch of JNE still + * prohibits access to PTR_MAYBE_NULL. + */ + "jne/jeq infer not null, PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL unchanged for JEQ false branch", + .insns = { + /* r6 = skb->sk; */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, sk)), + /* if (r6 == null) return 0; */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_6, 0, 8), + /* r7 = sk_fullsock(skb); */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0), + /* r0 = sk_fullsock(skb); */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock), + /* if (r0 == null) return 0; */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2), + /* if (r0 != r7) r0 = *(r7->type); */ + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 1), /* Use ! JEQ ! */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, type)), + /* return 0; */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "R7 invalid mem access 'sock_or_null'", +}, +{ + /* Maps are treated in a different branch of `mark_ptr_not_null_reg`, + * so separate test for maps case. + */ + "jne/jeq infer not null, PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL -> PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE", + .insns = { + /* r9 = &some stack to use as key */ + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_9, -8), + /* r8 = process local map */ + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_8, 0), + /* r6 = map_lookup_elem(r8, r9); */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_8), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_9), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0), + /* r7 = map_lookup_elem(r8, r9); */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_8), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_9), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0), + /* if (r6 == 0) return 0; */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_6, 0, 2), + /* if (r6 != r7) return 0; */ + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7, 1), + /* read *r7; */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, offsetof(struct bpf_xdp_sock, queue_id)), + /* return 0; */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map_xskmap = { 3 }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .result = ACCEPT, +}, -- 2.34.1