From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
To: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<martin.lau@linux.dev>, <song@kernel.org>, <yhs@fb.com>,
<john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
<sdf@google.com>, <haoluo@google.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
<illusionist.neo@gmail.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <mykolal@fb.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
<benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>, <memxor@gmail.com>,
<asavkov@redhat.com>, <delyank@fb.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 0/5] bpf: Support kernel function call in 32-bit ARM
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 17:20:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221107092032.178235-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com> (raw)
1. Patch1 is dependent patch to fix zext extension error in 32-bit ARM.
2. Patch2 and patch3 solve the problem that the bpf check fails because
load's mem size is modified in CO_RE from the kernel and user modes,
Currently, there are different opinions and a final solution needs to
be selected.
3. Patch4 supports bpf fkunc in 32-bit ARM for EABI.
4. Patch5 is used to add test cases to cover some parameter scenarios
states by AAPCS.
The following is the test_progs result in the 32-bit ARM environment:
# uname -m
armv7l
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# ./test_progs -t kfunc_call
#1/1 kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test_fail:OK
#1/2 kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test_null_fail:OK
#1/3 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_rdonly:OK
#1/4 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_use_after_free:OK
#1/5 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_oob:OK
#1/6 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_not_const:OK
#1/7 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_mem_acquire_fail:OK
#1/8 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test1:OK
#1/9 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test2:OK
#1/10 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test4:OK
#1/11 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_ref_btf_id:OK
#1/12 kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem:OK
#1/13 kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test:OK
#1/14 kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test_null:OK
#1/17 kfunc_call/destructive:OK
Yang Jihong (5):
bpf: Adapt 32-bit return value kfunc for 32-bit ARM when zext
extension
bpf: Adjust sk size check for sk in bpf_skb_is_valid_access for CO_RE
in 32-bit arch
libbpf: Skip adjust mem size for load pointer in 32-bit arch in CO_RE
bpf: Add kernel function call support in 32-bit ARM for EABI
bpf:selftests: Add kfunc_call test for mixing 32-bit and 64-bit
parameters
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 +
net/bpf/test_run.c | 18 +++
net/core/filter.c | 8 +-
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 34 ++++-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 3 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c | 52 +++++++
7 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.30.GIT
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-07 9:20 Yang Jihong [this message]
2022-11-07 9:20 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/5] bpf: Adapt 32-bit return value kfunc for 32-bit ARM when zext extension Yang Jihong
2022-11-08 23:12 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-11-26 9:45 ` Yang Jihong
2022-11-07 9:20 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/5] bpf: Adjust sk size check for sk in bpf_skb_is_valid_access for CO_RE in 32-bit arch Yang Jihong
2022-11-07 9:20 ` [PATCH bpf v2 3/5] libbpf: Skip adjust mem size for load pointer in 32-bit arch in CO_RE Yang Jihong
2022-11-08 1:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-08 2:44 ` Yang Jihong
2022-11-07 9:20 ` [PATCH bpf v2 4/5] bpf: Add kernel function call support in 32-bit ARM for EABI Yang Jihong
2022-11-07 12:33 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-08 0:52 ` Yang Jihong
2022-11-07 9:20 ` [PATCH bpf v2 5/5] bpf:selftests: Add kfunc_call test for mixing 32-bit and 64-bit parameters Yang Jihong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221107092032.178235-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com \
--to=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=asavkov@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=delyank@fb.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=illusionist.neo@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox