From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com,
yhs@fb.com, alan.maguire@oracle.com, acme@kernel.org,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests/bpf: Tests for btf_dedup_resolve_fwds
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:26:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221109142611.879983-4-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221109142611.879983-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Tests to verify the following behavior of `btf_dedup_resolve_fwds`:
- remapping for struct forward declarations;
- remapping for union forward declarations;
- no remapping if forward declaration kind does not match similarly
named struct or union declaration;
- no remapping if forward declaration name is ambiguous;
- base ids are considered for fwd resolution in split btf scenario.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 176 ++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c | 45 +++--
2 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
index c3e1cea9abae..95a2b80f0d17 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
@@ -7690,6 +7690,182 @@ static struct btf_dedup_test dedup_tests[] = {
BTF_STR_SEC("\0e1\0e1_val\0td"),
},
},
+{
+ .descr = "dedup: standalone fwd declaration struct",
+ /*
+ * Verify that CU1:foo and CU2:foo would be unified and that
+ * typedef/ptr would be updated to point to CU1:foo.
+ *
+ * // CU 1:
+ * struct foo { int x; };
+ *
+ * // CU 2:
+ * struct foo;
+ * typedef struct foo *foo_ptr;
+ */
+ .input = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ /* CU 1 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ /* CU 2 */
+ BTF_FWD_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 0), /* [3] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 4), /* [5] */
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+ .expect = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(1), /* [3] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+},
+{
+ .descr = "dedup: standalone fwd declaration union",
+ /*
+ * Verify that CU1:foo and CU2:foo would be unified and that
+ * typedef/ptr would be updated to point to CU1:foo.
+ * Same as "dedup: standalone fwd declaration struct" but for unions.
+ *
+ * // CU 1:
+ * union foo { int x; };
+ *
+ * // CU 2:
+ * union foo;
+ * typedef union foo *foo_ptr;
+ */
+ .input = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ /* CU 1 */
+ BTF_UNION_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ /* CU 2 */
+ BTF_FWD_ENC(NAME_TBD, 1), /* [3] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 4), /* [5] */
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+ .expect = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ BTF_UNION_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(1), /* [3] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+},
+{
+ .descr = "dedup: standalone fwd declaration wrong kind",
+ /*
+ * Negative test for btf_dedup_resolve_fwds:
+ * - CU1:foo is a struct, C2:foo is a union, thus CU2:foo is not deduped;
+ * - typedef/ptr should remain unchanged as well.
+ *
+ * // CU 1:
+ * struct foo { int x; };
+ *
+ * // CU 2:
+ * union foo;
+ * typedef union foo *foo_ptr;
+ */
+ .input = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ /* CU 1 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ /* CU 2 */
+ BTF_FWD_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 1), /* [3] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 4), /* [5] */
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+ .expect = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ /* CU 1 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ /* CU 2 */
+ BTF_FWD_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 1), /* [3] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 4), /* [5] */
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+},
+{
+ .descr = "dedup: standalone fwd declaration name conflict",
+ /*
+ * Negative test for btf_dedup_resolve_fwds:
+ * - two candidates for CU2:foo dedup, thus it is unchanged;
+ * - typedef/ptr should remain unchanged as well.
+ *
+ * // CU 1:
+ * struct foo { int x; };
+ *
+ * // CU 2:
+ * struct foo;
+ * typedef struct foo *foo_ptr;
+ *
+ * // CU 3:
+ * struct foo { int x; int y; };
+ */
+ .input = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ /* CU 1 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ /* CU 2 */
+ BTF_FWD_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 0), /* [3] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(4), 4), /* [5] */
+ /* CU 3 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 2, 8), /* [6] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 2, 0),
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0y\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+ .expect = {
+ .raw_types = {
+ /* CU 1 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 1, 4), /* [1] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(0, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
+ /* CU 2 */
+ BTF_FWD_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 0), /* [3] */
+ BTF_PTR_ENC(3), /* [4] */
+ BTF_TYPEDEF_ENC(NAME_NTH(4), 4), /* [5] */
+ /* CU 3 */
+ BTF_STRUCT_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), 2, 8), /* [6] */
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 2, 0),
+ BTF_MEMBER_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), 2, 0),
+ BTF_END_RAW,
+ },
+ BTF_STR_SEC("\0foo\0x\0y\0foo_ptr"),
+ },
+},
};
static int btf_type_size(const struct btf_type *t)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c
index 90aac437576d..d9024c7a892a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dedup_split.c
@@ -141,6 +141,10 @@ static void test_split_fwd_resolve() {
btf__add_field(btf1, "f2", 3, 64, 0); /* struct s2 *f2; */
/* } */
btf__add_struct(btf1, "s2", 4); /* [5] struct s2 { */
+ btf__add_field(btf1, "f1", 1, 0, 0); /* int f1; */
+ /* } */
+ /* keep this not a part of type the graph to test btf_dedup_resolve_fwds */
+ btf__add_struct(btf1, "s3", 4); /* [6] struct s3 { */
btf__add_field(btf1, "f1", 1, 0, 0); /* int f1; */
/* } */
@@ -153,20 +157,24 @@ static void test_split_fwd_resolve() {
"\t'f1' type_id=2 bits_offset=0\n"
"\t'f2' type_id=3 bits_offset=64",
"[5] STRUCT 's2' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+ "\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[6] STRUCT 's3' size=4 vlen=1\n"
"\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0");
btf2 = btf__new_empty_split(btf1);
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf2, "empty_split_btf"))
goto cleanup;
- btf__add_int(btf2, "int", 4, BTF_INT_SIGNED); /* [6] int */
- btf__add_ptr(btf2, 10); /* [7] ptr to struct s1 */
- btf__add_fwd(btf2, "s2", BTF_FWD_STRUCT); /* [8] fwd for struct s2 */
- btf__add_ptr(btf2, 8); /* [9] ptr to fwd struct s2 */
- btf__add_struct(btf2, "s1", 16); /* [10] struct s1 { */
- btf__add_field(btf2, "f1", 7, 0, 0); /* struct s1 *f1; */
- btf__add_field(btf2, "f2", 9, 64, 0); /* struct s2 *f2; */
+ btf__add_int(btf2, "int", 4, BTF_INT_SIGNED); /* [7] int */
+ btf__add_ptr(btf2, 11); /* [8] ptr to struct s1 */
+ btf__add_fwd(btf2, "s2", BTF_FWD_STRUCT); /* [9] fwd for struct s2 */
+ btf__add_ptr(btf2, 9); /* [10] ptr to fwd struct s2 */
+ btf__add_struct(btf2, "s1", 16); /* [11] struct s1 { */
+ btf__add_field(btf2, "f1", 8, 0, 0); /* struct s1 *f1; */
+ btf__add_field(btf2, "f2", 10, 64, 0); /* struct s2 *f2; */
/* } */
+ btf__add_fwd(btf2, "s3", BTF_FWD_STRUCT); /* [12] fwd for struct s3 */
+ btf__add_ptr(btf2, 12); /* [13] ptr to struct s1 */
VALIDATE_RAW_BTF(
btf2,
@@ -178,13 +186,17 @@ static void test_split_fwd_resolve() {
"\t'f2' type_id=3 bits_offset=64",
"[5] STRUCT 's2' size=4 vlen=1\n"
"\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
- "[6] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED",
- "[7] PTR '(anon)' type_id=10",
- "[8] FWD 's2' fwd_kind=struct",
- "[9] PTR '(anon)' type_id=8",
- "[10] STRUCT 's1' size=16 vlen=2\n"
- "\t'f1' type_id=7 bits_offset=0\n"
- "\t'f2' type_id=9 bits_offset=64");
+ "[6] STRUCT 's3' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+ "\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[7] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED",
+ "[8] PTR '(anon)' type_id=11",
+ "[9] FWD 's2' fwd_kind=struct",
+ "[10] PTR '(anon)' type_id=9",
+ "[11] STRUCT 's1' size=16 vlen=2\n"
+ "\t'f1' type_id=8 bits_offset=0\n"
+ "\t'f2' type_id=10 bits_offset=64",
+ "[12] FWD 's3' fwd_kind=struct",
+ "[13] PTR '(anon)' type_id=12");
err = btf__dedup(btf2, NULL);
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf_dedup"))
@@ -199,7 +211,10 @@ static void test_split_fwd_resolve() {
"\t'f1' type_id=2 bits_offset=0\n"
"\t'f2' type_id=3 bits_offset=64",
"[5] STRUCT 's2' size=4 vlen=1\n"
- "\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0");
+ "\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[6] STRUCT 's3' size=4 vlen=1\n"
+ "\t'f1' type_id=1 bits_offset=0",
+ "[7] PTR '(anon)' type_id=6");
cleanup:
btf__free(btf2);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-09 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-09 14:26 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] libbpf: Resolve unambigous forward declarations Eduard Zingerman
2022-11-09 14:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] libbpf: hashmap interface update to allow both long and void* keys/values Eduard Zingerman
2022-11-10 4:54 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-10 12:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2022-11-11 18:20 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-09 14:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] libbpf: Resolve unambigous forward declarations Eduard Zingerman
2022-11-09 14:26 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2022-11-10 5:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221109142611.879983-4-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox