From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/4] bpf: Add kfunc bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock()
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 20:54:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221123045406.2324479-1-yhs@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221123045350.2322811-1-yhs@fb.com>
Add two kfunc's bpf_rcu_read_lock() and bpf_rcu_read_unlock(). These two kfunc's
can be used for all program types. The following is an example about how
rcu pointer are used w.r.t. bpf_rcu_read_lock()/bpf_rcu_read_unlock().
struct task_struct {
...
struct task_struct *last_wakee;
struct task_struct __rcu *real_parent;
...
};
Let us say prog does 'task = bpf_get_current_task_btf()' to get a
'task' pointer. The basic rules are:
- 'real_parent = task->real_parent' should be inside bpf_rcu_read_lock
region. this is to simulate rcu_dereference() operation. The
'real_parent' is marked as MEM_RCU only if (1). task->real_parent is
inside bpf_rcu_read_lock region, and (2). task is a trusted ptr. So
MEM_RCU marked ptr can be 'trusted' inside the bpf_rcu_read_lock region.
- 'last_wakee = real_parent->last_wakee' should be inside bpf_rcu_read_lock
region since it tries to access rcu protected memory.
- the ptr 'last_wakee' will be marked as PTR_UNTRUSTED since in general
it is not clear whether the object pointed by 'last_wakee' is valid or
not even inside bpf_rcu_read_lock region.
To prevent rcu pointer leaks outside the rcu read lock region.
The verifier will clear all rcu pointer register state to unknown, i.e.,
scalar_value, at bpf_rcu_read_unlock() kfunc call site,
so later dereference becomes impossible.
The current implementation does not support nested rcu read lock
region in the prog.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 3 +
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 4 +-
kernel/bpf/btf.c | 3 +
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 12 +++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
5 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 43fd7eeeeabb..c6aa6912ea16 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -572,6 +572,9 @@ enum bpf_type_flag {
*/
PTR_TRUSTED = BIT(12 + BPF_BASE_TYPE_BITS),
+ /* MEM is tagged with rcu and memory access needs rcu_read_lock protection. */
+ MEM_RCU = BIT(13 + BPF_BASE_TYPE_BITS),
+
__BPF_TYPE_FLAG_MAX,
__BPF_TYPE_LAST_FLAG = __BPF_TYPE_FLAG_MAX - 1,
};
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 545152ac136c..1f3ce54e50ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_state {
u32 id;
} active_lock;
bool speculative;
+ bool active_rcu_lock;
/* first and last insn idx of this verifier state */
u32 first_insn_idx;
@@ -445,6 +446,7 @@ struct bpf_insn_aux_data {
u32 seen; /* this insn was processed by the verifier at env->pass_cnt */
bool sanitize_stack_spill; /* subject to Spectre v4 sanitation */
bool zext_dst; /* this insn zero extends dst reg */
+ bool storage_get_func_atomic; /* bpf_*_storage_get() with atomic memory alloc */
u8 alu_state; /* used in combination with alu_limit */
/* below fields are initialized once */
@@ -680,7 +682,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_prog_check_recur(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
}
}
-#define BPF_REG_TRUSTED_MODIFIERS (MEM_ALLOC | PTR_TRUSTED)
+#define BPF_REG_TRUSTED_MODIFIERS (MEM_ALLOC | MEM_RCU | PTR_TRUSTED)
static inline bool bpf_type_has_unsafe_modifiers(u32 type)
{
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 1a59cc7ad730..68df0df27302 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -6237,6 +6237,9 @@ static int btf_struct_walk(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
/* check __percpu tag */
if (strcmp(tag_value, "percpu") == 0)
tmp_flag = MEM_PERCPU;
+ /* check __rcu tag */
+ if (strcmp(tag_value, "rcu") == 0)
+ tmp_flag = MEM_RCU;
}
stype = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, mtype->type, &id);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index ae565b495f3d..eda9824694bf 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -1971,6 +1971,16 @@ void *bpf_rdonly_cast(void *obj__ign, u32 btf_id__k)
return obj__ign;
}
+void bpf_rcu_read_lock(void)
+{
+ rcu_read_lock();
+}
+
+void bpf_rcu_read_unlock(void)
+{
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
__diag_pop();
BTF_SET8_START(generic_btf_ids)
@@ -2012,6 +2022,8 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_cgroup_release)
BTF_SET8_START(common_btf_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_rdonly_cast)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_rcu_read_lock)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_rcu_read_unlock)
BTF_SET8_END(common_btf_ids)
static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set common_kfunc_set = {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 068cc885903c..f76c341fea82 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -527,6 +527,14 @@ static bool is_callback_calling_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
func_id == BPF_FUNC_user_ringbuf_drain;
}
+static bool is_storage_get_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
+{
+ return func_id == BPF_FUNC_sk_storage_get ||
+ func_id == BPF_FUNC_inode_storage_get ||
+ func_id == BPF_FUNC_task_storage_get ||
+ func_id == BPF_FUNC_cgrp_storage_get;
+}
+
static bool helper_multiple_ref_obj_use(enum bpf_func_id func_id,
const struct bpf_map *map)
{
@@ -589,11 +597,12 @@ static const char *reg_type_str(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
strncpy(postfix, "_or_null", 16);
}
- snprintf(prefix, sizeof(prefix), "%s%s%s%s%s%s",
+ snprintf(prefix, sizeof(prefix), "%s%s%s%s%s%s%s",
type & MEM_RDONLY ? "rdonly_" : "",
type & MEM_RINGBUF ? "ringbuf_" : "",
type & MEM_USER ? "user_" : "",
type & MEM_PERCPU ? "percpu_" : "",
+ type & MEM_RCU ? "rcu_" : "",
type & PTR_UNTRUSTED ? "untrusted_" : "",
type & PTR_TRUSTED ? "trusted_" : ""
);
@@ -1220,6 +1229,7 @@ static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst_state,
dst_state->frame[i] = NULL;
}
dst_state->speculative = src->speculative;
+ dst_state->active_rcu_lock = src->active_rcu_lock;
dst_state->curframe = src->curframe;
dst_state->active_lock.ptr = src->active_lock.ptr;
dst_state->active_lock.id = src->active_lock.id;
@@ -4258,6 +4268,25 @@ static bool is_flow_key_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno)
return reg->type == PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS;
}
+static bool is_trusted_reg(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
+{
+ /* A referenced register is always trusted. */
+ if (reg->ref_obj_id)
+ return true;
+
+ /* If a register is not referenced, it is trusted if it has either the
+ * MEM_ALLOC or PTR_TRUSTED type modifiers, and no others. Some of the
+ * other type modifiers may be safe, but we elect to take an opt-in
+ * approach here as some (e.g. PTR_UNTRUSTED and PTR_MAYBE_NULL) are
+ * not.
+ *
+ * Eventually, we should make PTR_TRUSTED the single source of truth
+ * for whether a register is trusted.
+ */
+ return type_flag(reg->type) & BPF_REG_TRUSTED_MODIFIERS &&
+ !bpf_type_has_unsafe_modifiers(reg->type);
+}
+
static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
int off, int size, bool strict)
@@ -4737,9 +4766,29 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
if (type_flag(reg->type) & PTR_UNTRUSTED)
flag |= PTR_UNTRUSTED;
- /* Any pointer obtained from walking a trusted pointer is no longer trusted. */
+ /* By default any pointer obtained from walking a trusted pointer is
+ * no longer trusted except the rcu case below.
+ */
flag &= ~PTR_TRUSTED;
+ if (flag & MEM_RCU) {
+ /* Mark value register as MEM_RCU only if it is protected by
+ * bpf_rcu_read_lock() and the ptr reg is trusted. MEM_RCU
+ * itself can already indicate trustedness inside the rcu
+ * read lock region. But Mark it as PTR_TRUSTED as well
+ * similar to MEM_ALLOC.
+ */
+ if (!env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock || !is_trusted_reg(reg))
+ flag &= ~MEM_RCU;
+ else
+ flag |= PTR_TRUSTED;
+ } else if (reg->type & MEM_RCU) {
+ /* ptr (reg) is marked as MEM_RCU, but value reg is not marked
+ * as MEM_RCU. Mark the value reg as PTR_UNTRUSTED conservatively.
+ */
+ flag |= PTR_UNTRUSTED;
+ }
+
if (atype == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
mark_btf_ld_reg(env, regs, value_regno, ret, reg->btf, btf_id, flag);
@@ -5897,6 +5946,7 @@ static const struct bpf_reg_types btf_ptr_types = {
.types = {
PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED,
+ PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU | PTR_TRUSTED,
},
};
static const struct bpf_reg_types percpu_btf_ptr_types = {
@@ -6075,6 +6125,7 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED:
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU | PTR_TRUSTED:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | PTR_TRUSTED:
/* When referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is passed to release function,
* it's fixed offset must be 0. In the other cases, fixed offset
@@ -7539,6 +7590,17 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
return err;
}
+ if (env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock) {
+ if (fn->might_sleep) {
+ verbose(env, "sleepable helper %s#%din rcu_read_lock region\n",
+ func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (env->prog->aux->sleepable && is_storage_get_function(func_id))
+ env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].storage_get_func_atomic = true;
+ }
+
meta.func_id = func_id;
/* check args */
for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS; i++) {
@@ -7966,25 +8028,6 @@ static bool is_kfunc_arg_kptr_get(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta, int arg)
return arg == 0 && (meta->kfunc_flags & KF_KPTR_GET);
}
-static bool is_trusted_reg(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
-{
- /* A referenced register is always trusted. */
- if (reg->ref_obj_id)
- return true;
-
- /* If a register is not referenced, it is trusted if it has either the
- * MEM_ALLOC or PTR_TRUSTED type modifiers, and no others. Some of the
- * other type modifiers may be safe, but we elect to take an opt-in
- * approach here as some (e.g. PTR_UNTRUSTED and PTR_MAYBE_NULL) are
- * not.
- *
- * Eventually, we should make PTR_TRUSTED the single source of truth
- * for whether a register is trusted.
- */
- return type_flag(reg->type) & BPF_REG_TRUSTED_MODIFIERS &&
- !bpf_type_has_unsafe_modifiers(reg->type);
-}
-
static bool __kfunc_param_match_suffix(const struct btf *btf,
const struct btf_param *arg,
const char *suffix)
@@ -8163,6 +8206,8 @@ enum special_kfunc_type {
KF_bpf_list_pop_back,
KF_bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx,
KF_bpf_rdonly_cast,
+ KF_bpf_rcu_read_lock,
+ KF_bpf_rcu_read_unlock,
};
BTF_SET_START(special_kfunc_set)
@@ -8185,6 +8230,18 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_pop_front)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_pop_back)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_rdonly_cast)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_rcu_read_lock)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_rcu_read_unlock)
+
+static bool is_kfunc_bpf_rcu_read_lock(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
+{
+ return meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rcu_read_lock];
+}
+
+static bool is_kfunc_bpf_rcu_read_unlock(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
+{
+ return meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rcu_read_unlock];
+}
static enum kfunc_ptr_arg_type
get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
@@ -8817,6 +8874,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
const struct btf_type *t, *func, *func_proto, *ptr_type;
struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
const char *func_name, *ptr_type_name;
+ bool sleepable, rcu_lock, rcu_unlock;
struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta meta;
u32 i, nargs, func_id, ptr_type_id;
int err, insn_idx = *insn_idx_p;
@@ -8858,11 +8916,38 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
return -EACCES;
}
- if (is_kfunc_sleepable(&meta) && !env->prog->aux->sleepable) {
+ sleepable = is_kfunc_sleepable(&meta);
+ if (sleepable && !env->prog->aux->sleepable) {
verbose(env, "program must be sleepable to call sleepable kfunc %s\n", func_name);
return -EACCES;
}
+ rcu_lock = is_kfunc_bpf_rcu_read_lock(&meta);
+ rcu_unlock = is_kfunc_bpf_rcu_read_unlock(&meta);
+ if (env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock) {
+ struct bpf_func_state *state;
+ struct bpf_reg_state *reg;
+
+ if (rcu_lock) {
+ verbose(env, "nested rcu read lock (kernel function %s)\n", func_name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else if (rcu_unlock) {
+ bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate(env->cur_state, state, reg, ({
+ if (reg->type & MEM_RCU)
+ __mark_reg_unknown(env, reg);
+ }));
+ env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock = false;
+ } else if (sleepable) {
+ verbose(env, "kernel func %s is sleepable within rcu_read_lock region\n", func_name);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ } else if (rcu_lock) {
+ env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock = true;
+ } else if (rcu_unlock) {
+ verbose(env, "unmatched rcu read unlock (kernel function %s)\n", func_name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
/* Check the arguments */
err = check_kfunc_args(env, &meta);
if (err < 0)
@@ -11754,6 +11839,11 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock) {
+ verbose(env, "BPF_LD_[ABS|IND] cannot be used inside bpf_rcu_read_lock-ed region\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (regs[ctx_reg].type != PTR_TO_CTX) {
verbose(env,
"at the time of BPF_LD_ABS|IND R6 != pointer to skb\n");
@@ -13019,6 +13109,9 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
old->active_lock.id != cur->active_lock.id)
return false;
+ if (old->active_rcu_lock != cur->active_rcu_lock)
+ return false;
+
/* for states to be equal callsites have to be the same
* and all frame states need to be equivalent
*/
@@ -13706,6 +13799,11 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock) {
+ verbose(env, "bpf_rcu_read_unlock is missing\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
/* We must do check_reference_leak here before
* prepare_func_exit to handle the case when
* state->curframe > 0, it may be a callback
@@ -14802,6 +14900,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_UNTRUSTED:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED:
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU | PTR_TRUSTED:
/* PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC always has a valid lifetime, unlike
* PTR_TO_BTF_ID, and an active ref_obj_id, but the same cannot
* be said once it is marked PTR_UNTRUSTED, hence we must handle
@@ -15494,14 +15593,12 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
goto patch_call_imm;
}
- if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_task_storage_get ||
- insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_sk_storage_get ||
- insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_inode_storage_get ||
- insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_cgrp_storage_get) {
- if (env->prog->aux->sleepable)
- insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, (__force __s32)GFP_KERNEL);
- else
+ if (is_storage_get_function(insn->imm)) {
+ if (!env->prog->aux->sleepable ||
+ env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].storage_get_func_atomic)
insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, (__force __s32)GFP_ATOMIC);
+ else
+ insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, (__force __s32)GFP_KERNEL);
insn_buf[1] = *insn;
cnt = 2;
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-23 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-23 4:53 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/4] bpf: Add bpf_rcu_read_lock() support Yonghong Song
2022-11-23 4:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/4] compiler_types: Define __rcu as __attribute__((btf_type_tag("rcu"))) Yonghong Song
2022-11-23 4:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/4] bpf: Introduce might_sleep field in bpf_func_proto Yonghong Song
2022-11-23 4:54 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2022-11-23 23:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/4] bpf: Add kfunc bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() Martin KaFai Lau
2022-11-24 1:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-24 2:57 ` Yonghong Song
2022-11-24 4:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-24 5:16 ` Yonghong Song
2022-11-23 4:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_rcu_read_lock() Yonghong Song
2022-11-23 23:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/4] bpf: Add bpf_rcu_read_lock() support Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221123045406.2324479-1-yhs@fb.com \
--to=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox