From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com,
yhs@fb.com, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf: reduce BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE to fit only valid programs
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 04:17:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221217021711.172247-4-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221217021711.172247-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
BPF limits stack usage by MAX_BPF_STACK bytes across all call frames,
however this is enforced by function check_max_stack_depth() which is
executed after do_check_{subprogs,main}().
This means that when check_ids() is executed the maximal stack depth is not
yet verified, thus in theory the number of stack spills might be
MAX_CALL_FRAMES * MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE.
However, any program with stack usage deeper than
MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE would be rejected by verifier.
Hence save some memory by reducing the BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE.
This is a follow up for
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzYN1JmY9t03pnCHc4actob80wkBz2vk90ihJCBzi8CT9w@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 4 ++--
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 ++++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 53d175cbaa02..da72e16f1dee 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -274,8 +274,8 @@ struct bpf_id_pair {
};
#define MAX_CALL_FRAMES 8
-/* Maximum number of register states that can exist at once */
-#define BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE ((MAX_BPF_REG + MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE) * MAX_CALL_FRAMES)
+/* Maximum number of register states that can exist at once in a valid program */
+#define BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE (MAX_BPF_REG * MAX_CALL_FRAMES + MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE)
struct bpf_verifier_state {
/* call stack tracking */
struct bpf_func_state *frame[MAX_CALL_FRAMES];
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a5255a0dcbb6..fb040516a946 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -12951,8 +12951,10 @@ static bool check_ids(u32 old_id, u32 cur_id, struct bpf_id_pair *idmap)
if (idmap[i].old == old_id)
return idmap[i].cur == cur_id;
}
- /* We ran out of idmap slots, which should be impossible */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ /* Run out of slots in idmap, conservatively return false, cached
+ * state will not be reused. The BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE is sufficiently
+ * large to fit all valid programs.
+ */
return false;
}
--
2.38.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-17 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-17 2:17 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] reduce BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE to fit only valid programs Eduard Zingerman
2022-12-17 2:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: support for BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ in test_loader Eduard Zingerman
2022-12-17 18:44 ` Yonghong Song
2022-12-20 21:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-12-22 0:11 ` Eduard Zingerman
2022-12-22 19:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-12-17 2:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: convenience macro for use with 'asm volatile' blocks Eduard Zingerman
2022-12-17 18:58 ` Yonghong Song
2022-12-20 21:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-12-22 0:12 ` Eduard Zingerman
2022-12-17 2:17 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2022-12-17 18:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf: reduce BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE to fit only valid programs Yonghong Song
2022-12-20 21:06 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-12-17 2:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: check if verifier.c:check_ids() handles 64+5 ids Eduard Zingerman
2022-12-17 19:17 ` Yonghong Song
2022-12-20 21:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-12-22 0:33 ` Eduard Zingerman
2022-12-20 21:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] reduce BPF_ID_MAP_SIZE to fit only valid programs Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221217021711.172247-4-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox