From: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/13] bpf: Migrate release_on_unlock logic to non-owning ref semantics
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 00:24:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221217082506.1570898-3-davemarchevsky@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221217082506.1570898-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com>
This patch introduces non-owning reference semantics to the verifier,
specifically linked_list API kfunc handling. release_on_unlock logic for
refs is refactored - with small functional changes - to implement these
semantics, and bpf_list_push_{front,back} are migrated to use them.
When a list node is pushed to a list, the program still has a pointer to
the node:
n = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*n));
bpf_spin_lock(&l);
bpf_list_push_back(&l, n);
/* n still points to the just-added node */
bpf_spin_unlock(&l);
What the verifier considers n to be after the push, and thus what can be
done with n, are changed by this patch.
Common properties both before/after this patch:
* After push, n is only a valid reference to the node until end of
critical section
* After push, n cannot be pushed to any list
* After push, the program can read the node's fields using n
Before:
* After push, n retains the ref_obj_id which it received on
bpf_obj_new, but the associated bpf_reference_state's
release_on_unlock field is set to true
* release_on_unlock field and associated logic is used to implement
"n is only a valid ref until end of critical section"
* After push, n cannot be written to, the node must be removed from
the list before writing to its fields
* After push, n is marked PTR_UNTRUSTED
After:
* After push, n's ref is released and ref_obj_id set to 0. The
bpf_reg_state's non_owning_ref_lock struct is populated with the
currently active lock
* non_owning_ref_lock and logic is used to implement "n is only a
valid ref until end of critical section"
* n can be written to (except for special fields e.g. bpf_list_node,
timer, ...)
* No special type flag is added to n after push
Summary of specific implementation changes to achieve the above:
* release_on_unlock field, ref_set_release_on_unlock helper, and logic
to "release on unlock" based on that field are removed
* The anonymous active_lock struct used by bpf_verifier_state is
pulled out into a named struct bpf_active_lock.
* A non_owning_ref_lock field of type bpf_active_lock is added to
bpf_reg_state's PTR_TO_BTF_ID union
* Helpers are added to use non_owning_ref_lock to implement non-owning
ref semantics as described above
* invalidate_non_owning_refs - helper to clobber all non-owning refs
matching a particular bpf_active_lock identity. Replaces
release_on_unlock logic in process_spin_lock.
* ref_set_non_owning_lock - set non_owning_ref_lock for a reg based
on current verifier state
* ref_convert_owning_non_owning - convert owning reference w/
specified ref_obj_id to non-owning references. Setup
non_owning_ref_lock for each reg with that ref_obj_id and 0 out
its ref_obj_id
* New KF_RELEASE_NON_OWN flag is added, to be used in conjunction with
KF_RELEASE to indicate that the release arg reg should be converted
to non-owning ref
* Plain KF_RELEASE would clobber all regs with ref_obj_id matching
the release arg reg's. KF_RELEASE_NON_OWN's logic triggers first -
doing ref_convert_owning_non_owning on the ref first, which
prevents the regs from being clobbered by 0ing out their
ref_obj_ids. The bpf_reference_state itself is still released via
release_reference as a result of the KF_RELEASE flag.
* KF_RELEASE | KF_RELEASE_NON_OWN are added to
bpf_list_push_{front,back}
After these changes, linked_list's "release on unlock" logic continues
to function as before, except for the semantic differences noted above.
The patch immediately following this one makes minor changes to
linked_list selftests to account for the differing behavior.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 39 ++++-----
include/linux/btf.h | 17 ++--
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 4 +-
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 164 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
5 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 3de24cfb7a3d..f71571bf6adc 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ enum btf_field_type {
BPF_KPTR = BPF_KPTR_UNREF | BPF_KPTR_REF,
BPF_LIST_HEAD = (1 << 4),
BPF_LIST_NODE = (1 << 5),
+ BPF_GRAPH_NODE_OR_ROOT = BPF_LIST_NODE | BPF_LIST_HEAD,
};
struct btf_field_kptr {
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 53d175cbaa02..cb417ffbbb84 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -43,6 +43,22 @@ enum bpf_reg_liveness {
REG_LIVE_DONE = 0x8, /* liveness won't be updating this register anymore */
};
+/* For every reg representing a map value or allocated object pointer,
+ * we consider the tuple of (ptr, id) for them to be unique in verifier
+ * context and conside them to not alias each other for the purposes of
+ * tracking lock state.
+ */
+struct bpf_active_lock {
+ /* This can either be reg->map_ptr or reg->btf. If ptr is NULL,
+ * there's no active lock held, and other fields have no
+ * meaning. If non-NULL, it indicates that a lock is held and
+ * id member has the reg->id of the register which can be >= 0.
+ */
+ void *ptr;
+ /* This will be reg->id */
+ u32 id;
+};
+
struct bpf_reg_state {
/* Ordering of fields matters. See states_equal() */
enum bpf_reg_type type;
@@ -68,6 +84,7 @@ struct bpf_reg_state {
struct {
struct btf *btf;
u32 btf_id;
+ struct bpf_active_lock non_owning_ref_lock;
};
u32 mem_size; /* for PTR_TO_MEM | PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL */
@@ -223,11 +240,6 @@ struct bpf_reference_state {
* exiting a callback function.
*/
int callback_ref;
- /* Mark the reference state to release the registers sharing the same id
- * on bpf_spin_unlock (for nodes that we will lose ownership to but are
- * safe to access inside the critical section).
- */
- bool release_on_unlock;
};
/* state of the program:
@@ -328,21 +340,8 @@ struct bpf_verifier_state {
u32 branches;
u32 insn_idx;
u32 curframe;
- /* For every reg representing a map value or allocated object pointer,
- * we consider the tuple of (ptr, id) for them to be unique in verifier
- * context and conside them to not alias each other for the purposes of
- * tracking lock state.
- */
- struct {
- /* This can either be reg->map_ptr or reg->btf. If ptr is NULL,
- * there's no active lock held, and other fields have no
- * meaning. If non-NULL, it indicates that a lock is held and
- * id member has the reg->id of the register which can be >= 0.
- */
- void *ptr;
- /* This will be reg->id */
- u32 id;
- } active_lock;
+
+ struct bpf_active_lock active_lock;
bool speculative;
bool active_rcu_lock;
diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index 5f628f323442..8aee3f7f4248 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -15,10 +15,10 @@
#define BTF_TYPE_EMIT_ENUM(enum_val) ((void)enum_val)
/* These need to be macros, as the expressions are used in assembler input */
-#define KF_ACQUIRE (1 << 0) /* kfunc is an acquire function */
-#define KF_RELEASE (1 << 1) /* kfunc is a release function */
-#define KF_RET_NULL (1 << 2) /* kfunc returns a pointer that may be NULL */
-#define KF_KPTR_GET (1 << 3) /* kfunc returns reference to a kptr */
+#define KF_ACQUIRE (1 << 0) /* kfunc is an acquire function */
+#define KF_RELEASE (1 << 1) /* kfunc is a release function */
+#define KF_RET_NULL (1 << 2) /* kfunc returns a pointer that may be NULL */
+#define KF_KPTR_GET (1 << 3) /* kfunc returns reference to a kptr */
/* Trusted arguments are those which are guaranteed to be valid when passed to
* the kfunc. It is used to enforce that pointers obtained from either acquire
* kfuncs, or from the main kernel on a tracepoint or struct_ops callback
@@ -67,10 +67,11 @@
* return 0;
* }
*/
-#define KF_TRUSTED_ARGS (1 << 4) /* kfunc only takes trusted pointer arguments */
-#define KF_SLEEPABLE (1 << 5) /* kfunc may sleep */
-#define KF_DESTRUCTIVE (1 << 6) /* kfunc performs destructive actions */
-#define KF_RCU (1 << 7) /* kfunc only takes rcu pointer arguments */
+#define KF_TRUSTED_ARGS (1 << 4) /* kfunc only takes trusted pointer arguments */
+#define KF_SLEEPABLE (1 << 5) /* kfunc may sleep */
+#define KF_DESTRUCTIVE (1 << 6) /* kfunc performs destructive actions */
+#define KF_RCU (1 << 7) /* kfunc only takes rcu pointer arguments */
+#define KF_RELEASE_NON_OWN (1 << 8) /* kfunc converts its referenced arg into non-owning ref */
/*
* Return the name of the passed struct, if exists, or halt the build if for
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index af30c6cbd65d..e041409779c3 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2049,8 +2049,8 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, crash_kexec, KF_DESTRUCTIVE)
#endif
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_obj_new_impl, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_obj_drop_impl, KF_RELEASE)
-BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_front)
-BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_back)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_front, KF_RELEASE | KF_RELEASE_NON_OWN)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_back, KF_RELEASE | KF_RELEASE_NON_OWN)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_pop_front, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_pop_back, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 824e2242eae5..84b0660e2a76 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -190,6 +190,10 @@ struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem {
static int acquire_reference_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx);
static int release_reference(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int ref_obj_id);
+static void invalidate_non_owning_refs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ struct bpf_active_lock *lock);
+static int ref_set_non_owning_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ struct bpf_reg_state *reg);
static bool bpf_map_ptr_poisoned(const struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux)
{
@@ -931,6 +935,9 @@ static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
verbose_a("id=%d", reg->id);
if (reg->ref_obj_id)
verbose_a("ref_obj_id=%d", reg->ref_obj_id);
+ if (reg->non_owning_ref_lock.ptr)
+ verbose_a("non_own_id=(%p,%d)", reg->non_owning_ref_lock.ptr,
+ reg->non_owning_ref_lock.id);
if (t != SCALAR_VALUE)
verbose_a("off=%d", reg->off);
if (type_is_pkt_pointer(t))
@@ -4820,7 +4827,8 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return -EACCES;
}
- if (type_is_alloc(reg->type) && !reg->ref_obj_id) {
+ if (type_is_alloc(reg->type) && !reg->ref_obj_id &&
+ !reg->non_owning_ref_lock.ptr) {
verbose(env, "verifier internal error: ref_obj_id for allocated object must be non-zero\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
@@ -5778,9 +5786,7 @@ static int process_spin_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
cur->active_lock.ptr = btf;
cur->active_lock.id = reg->id;
} else {
- struct bpf_func_state *fstate = cur_func(env);
void *ptr;
- int i;
if (map)
ptr = map;
@@ -5796,25 +5802,11 @@ static int process_spin_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
verbose(env, "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- cur->active_lock.ptr = NULL;
- cur->active_lock.id = 0;
- for (i = fstate->acquired_refs - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
- int err;
+ invalidate_non_owning_refs(env, &cur->active_lock);
- /* Complain on error because this reference state cannot
- * be freed before this point, as bpf_spin_lock critical
- * section does not allow functions that release the
- * allocated object immediately.
- */
- if (!fstate->refs[i].release_on_unlock)
- continue;
- err = release_reference(env, fstate->refs[i].id);
- if (err) {
- verbose(env, "failed to release release_on_unlock reference");
- return err;
- }
- }
+ cur->active_lock.ptr = NULL;
+ cur->active_lock.id = 0;
}
return 0;
}
@@ -6273,6 +6265,23 @@ static int check_reg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
return 0;
}
+static struct btf_field *
+reg_find_field_offset(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, s32 off, u32 fields)
+{
+ struct btf_field *field;
+ struct btf_record *rec;
+
+ rec = reg_btf_record(reg);
+ if (!reg)
+ return NULL;
+
+ field = btf_record_find(rec, off, fields);
+ if (!field)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return field;
+}
+
int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int regno,
enum bpf_arg_type arg_type)
@@ -6294,6 +6303,18 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
*/
if (arg_type_is_dynptr(arg_type) && type == PTR_TO_STACK)
return 0;
+
+ if (type == (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC) && reg->off) {
+ if (reg_find_field_offset(reg, reg->off, BPF_GRAPH_NODE_OR_ROOT))
+ return __check_ptr_off_reg(env, reg, regno, true);
+
+ verbose(env, "R%d must have zero offset when passed to release func\n",
+ regno);
+ verbose(env, "No graph node or root found at R%d type:%s off:%d\n", regno,
+ kernel_type_name(reg->btf, reg->btf_id), reg->off);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
/* Doing check_ptr_off_reg check for the offset will catch this
* because fixed_off_ok is false, but checking here allows us
* to give the user a better error message.
@@ -7055,6 +7076,20 @@ static int release_reference(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return 0;
}
+static void invalidate_non_owning_refs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ struct bpf_active_lock *lock)
+{
+ struct bpf_func_state *unused;
+ struct bpf_reg_state *reg;
+
+ bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate(env->cur_state, unused, reg, ({
+ if (reg->non_owning_ref_lock.ptr &&
+ reg->non_owning_ref_lock.ptr == lock->ptr &&
+ reg->non_owning_ref_lock.id == lock->id)
+ __mark_reg_unknown(env, reg);
+ }));
+}
+
static void clear_caller_saved_regs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_reg_state *regs)
{
@@ -8266,6 +8301,11 @@ static bool is_kfunc_release(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_RELEASE;
}
+static bool is_kfunc_release_non_own(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
+{
+ return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_RELEASE_NON_OWN;
+}
+
static bool is_kfunc_trusted_args(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
{
return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_TRUSTED_ARGS;
@@ -8651,38 +8691,55 @@ static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_kptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return 0;
}
-static int ref_set_release_on_unlock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 ref_obj_id)
+static int ref_set_non_owning_lock(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
- struct bpf_func_state *state = cur_func(env);
+ struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state;
+
+ if (!state->active_lock.ptr) {
+ verbose(env, "verifier internal error: ref_set_non_owning_lock w/o active lock\n");
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+
+ if (reg->non_owning_ref_lock.ptr) {
+ verbose(env, "verifier internal error: non_owning_ref_lock already set\n");
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+
+ reg->non_owning_ref_lock.id = state->active_lock.id;
+ reg->non_owning_ref_lock.ptr = state->active_lock.ptr;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int ref_convert_owning_non_owning(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 ref_obj_id)
+{
+ struct bpf_func_state *state, *unused;
struct bpf_reg_state *reg;
int i;
- /* bpf_spin_lock only allows calling list_push and list_pop, no BPF
- * subprogs, no global functions. This means that the references would
- * not be released inside the critical section but they may be added to
- * the reference state, and the acquired_refs are never copied out for a
- * different frame as BPF to BPF calls don't work in bpf_spin_lock
- * critical sections.
- */
+ state = cur_func(env);
+
if (!ref_obj_id) {
- verbose(env, "verifier internal error: ref_obj_id is zero for release_on_unlock\n");
+ verbose(env, "verifier internal error: ref_obj_id is zero for "
+ "owning -> non-owning conversion\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
+
for (i = 0; i < state->acquired_refs; i++) {
- if (state->refs[i].id == ref_obj_id) {
- if (state->refs[i].release_on_unlock) {
- verbose(env, "verifier internal error: expected false release_on_unlock");
- return -EFAULT;
+ if (state->refs[i].id != ref_obj_id)
+ continue;
+
+ /* Clear ref_obj_id here so release_reference doesn't clobber
+ * the whole reg
+ */
+ bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate(env->cur_state, unused, reg, ({
+ if (reg->ref_obj_id == ref_obj_id) {
+ reg->ref_obj_id = 0;
+ ref_set_non_owning_lock(env, reg);
}
- state->refs[i].release_on_unlock = true;
- /* Now mark everyone sharing same ref_obj_id as untrusted */
- bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate(env->cur_state, state, reg, ({
- if (reg->ref_obj_id == ref_obj_id)
- reg->type |= PTR_UNTRUSTED;
- }));
- return 0;
- }
+ }));
+ return 0;
}
+
verbose(env, "verifier internal error: ref state missing for ref_obj_id\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
@@ -8817,7 +8874,6 @@ static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_list_node(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
{
const struct btf_type *et, *t;
struct btf_field *field;
- struct btf_record *rec;
u32 list_node_off;
if (meta->btf != btf_vmlinux ||
@@ -8834,9 +8890,8 @@ static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_list_node(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return -EINVAL;
}
- rec = reg_btf_record(reg);
list_node_off = reg->off + reg->var_off.value;
- field = btf_record_find(rec, list_node_off, BPF_LIST_NODE);
+ field = reg_find_field_offset(reg, list_node_off, BPF_LIST_NODE);
if (!field || field->offset != list_node_off) {
verbose(env, "bpf_list_node not found at offset=%u\n", list_node_off);
return -EINVAL;
@@ -8861,8 +8916,8 @@ static int process_kf_arg_ptr_to_list_node(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
btf_name_by_offset(field->list_head.btf, et->name_off));
return -EINVAL;
}
- /* Set arg#1 for expiration after unlock */
- return ref_set_release_on_unlock(env, reg->ref_obj_id);
+
+ return 0;
}
static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
@@ -9132,11 +9187,11 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
int *insn_idx_p)
{
const struct btf_type *t, *func, *func_proto, *ptr_type;
+ u32 i, nargs, func_id, ptr_type_id, release_ref_obj_id;
struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
const char *func_name, *ptr_type_name;
bool sleepable, rcu_lock, rcu_unlock;
struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta meta;
- u32 i, nargs, func_id, ptr_type_id;
int err, insn_idx = *insn_idx_p;
const struct btf_param *args;
const struct btf_type *ret_t;
@@ -9223,7 +9278,18 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
* PTR_TO_BTF_ID in bpf_kfunc_arg_meta, do the release now.
*/
if (meta.release_regno) {
- err = release_reference(env, regs[meta.release_regno].ref_obj_id);
+ err = 0;
+ release_ref_obj_id = regs[meta.release_regno].ref_obj_id;
+
+ if (is_kfunc_release_non_own(&meta))
+ err = ref_convert_owning_non_owning(env, release_ref_obj_id);
+ if (err) {
+ verbose(env, "kfunc %s#%d conversion of owning ref to non-owning failed\n",
+ func_name, func_id);
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ err = release_reference(env, release_ref_obj_id);
if (err) {
verbose(env, "kfunc %s#%d reference has not been acquired before\n",
func_name, func_id);
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-17 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-17 8:24 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/13] BPF rbtree next-gen datastructure Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-17 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/13] bpf: Support multiple arg regs w/ ref_obj_id for kfuncs Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-29 3:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-29 6:40 ` David Vernet
2022-12-29 16:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-29 17:00 ` David Vernet
2023-01-17 17:26 ` Dave Marchevsky
2023-01-17 17:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-17 23:12 ` Dave Marchevsky
2023-01-20 5:13 ` David Vernet
2022-12-17 8:24 ` Dave Marchevsky [this message]
2022-12-17 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/13] bpf: Migrate release_on_unlock logic to non-owning ref semantics Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-23 10:51 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-12-28 23:46 ` David Vernet
2022-12-29 15:39 ` David Vernet
2022-12-29 3:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-29 16:54 ` David Vernet
2023-01-17 16:54 ` Dave Marchevsky
2023-01-17 16:07 ` Dave Marchevsky
2023-01-17 16:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-17 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/13] selftests/bpf: Update linked_list tests for " Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-17 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 04/13] bpf: rename list_head -> graph_root in field info types Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-17 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/13] bpf: Add basic bpf_rb_{root,node} support Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-17 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/13] bpf: Add bpf_rbtree_{add,remove,first} kfuncs Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-17 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/13] bpf: Add support for bpf_rb_root and bpf_rb_node in kfunc args Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-29 4:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-17 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 08/13] bpf: Add callback validation to kfunc verifier logic Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-17 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/13] bpf: Special verifier handling for bpf_rbtree_{remove, first} Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-29 4:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-17 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 10/13] bpf: Add bpf_rbtree_{add,remove,first} decls to bpf_experimental.h Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-17 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 11/13] libbpf: Make BTF mandatory if program BTF has spin_lock or alloc_obj type Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-22 18:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-12-17 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/13] selftests/bpf: Add rbtree selftests Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-17 8:25 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 13/13] bpf, documentation: Add graph documentation for non-owning refs Dave Marchevsky
2022-12-28 21:26 ` David Vernet
2023-01-18 2:16 ` Dave Marchevsky
2023-01-20 4:45 ` David Vernet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221217082506.1570898-3-davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--to=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox