From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: [Patch bpf-next 2/2] bpf: remove a redundant parameter of bpf_prog_free_id()
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 22:02:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230117060249.912679-3-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230117060249.912679-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
The second parameter of bpf_prog_free_id() is always true,
hence can be just eliminated.
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/offload.c | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 23 +++++------------------
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 3558c192871c..2c0d2383cea0 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1832,7 +1832,7 @@ void bpf_prog_inc(struct bpf_prog *prog);
struct bpf_prog * __must_check bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_prog *prog);
void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog);
-void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock);
+void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog);
void bpf_map_free_id(struct bpf_map *map);
struct btf_field *btf_record_find(const struct btf_record *rec,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/offload.c b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
index ae6d5a5c0798..658032e294ed 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/offload.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static void __bpf_prog_offload_destroy(struct bpf_prog *prog)
offload->offdev->ops->destroy(prog);
/* Make sure BPF_PROG_GET_NEXT_ID can't find this dead program */
- bpf_prog_free_id(prog, true);
+ bpf_prog_free_id(prog);
list_del_init(&offload->offloads);
kfree(offload);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 1eaa1a18aef7..b56f65328d9c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1988,7 +1988,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_alloc_id(struct bpf_prog *prog)
return id > 0 ? 0 : id;
}
-void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
+void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -2000,18 +2000,10 @@ void bpf_prog_free_id(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
if (!prog->aux->id)
return;
- if (do_idr_lock)
- spin_lock_irqsave(&prog_idr_lock, flags);
- else
- __acquire(&prog_idr_lock);
-
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&prog_idr_lock, flags);
idr_remove(&prog_idr, prog->aux->id);
prog->aux->id = 0;
-
- if (do_idr_lock)
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&prog_idr_lock, flags);
- else
- __release(&prog_idr_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&prog_idr_lock, flags);
}
static void __bpf_prog_put_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
@@ -2057,13 +2049,13 @@ static void bpf_prog_put_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
__bpf_prog_put_noref(prog, true);
}
-static void __bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
+void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = prog->aux;
if (atomic64_dec_and_test(&aux->refcnt)) {
/* bpf_prog_free_id() must be called first */
- bpf_prog_free_id(prog, do_idr_lock);
+ bpf_prog_free_id(prog);
if (in_irq() || irqs_disabled()) {
INIT_WORK(&aux->work, bpf_prog_put_deferred);
@@ -2073,11 +2065,6 @@ static void __bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog, bool do_idr_lock)
}
}
}
-
-void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
- __bpf_prog_put(prog, true);
-}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_prog_put);
static int bpf_prog_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-17 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-17 6:02 [Patch bpf-next 0/2] bpf: two trivial cleanup patches Cong Wang
2023-01-17 6:02 ` [Patch bpf-next 1/2] bpf: remove a redundant parameter of bpf_map_free_id() Cong Wang
2023-01-17 6:02 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2023-01-17 9:40 ` [Patch bpf-next 2/2] bpf: remove a redundant parameter of bpf_prog_free_id() Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230117060249.912679-3-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox