public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, ecree.xilinx@gmail.com,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/1]  docs/bpf: Add description of register liveness tracking algorithm
Date: Thu,  2 Feb 2023 14:57:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230202125713.821931-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)

An overview of the register tracking liveness algorithm.
Previous versions posted here: [1], [2], [3].
- Changes from RFC to v2 (suggested by Andrii Nakryiko):
  - wording corrected to use term "stack slot" instead of "stack spill";
  - parentage chain diagram updated to show nil links for frame #1;
  - added example for non-BPF_DW writes behavior;
  - explanation in "Read marks propagation for cache hits" is reworked.
- Changes from v2 to v3:
  - lot's of grammatical / wording fixes as suggested by David Vernet;
  - "Register parentage chains" section is fixed to reflect what
    happens to r1-r5 when function call is processed (as suggested by David and Alexei);
  - Example in "Liveness marks tracking" section updated to explain
    why partial writes should not lead to REG_LIVE_WRITTEN marks
    (suggested by David);
  - "Read marks propagation for cache hits" section updates:
    - Explanation updated to hint why read marks should be propagated
      before jumping to example (suggested by David);
    - Removed box around B/D in the diagram updated (suggested by Alexei).
- Changes from v3 to v4 (suggested by Edward Cree):
  - register parentage chain diagram updated to explain why r6 mark is
    not propagated;
  - read mark propagation algorithm pseudo-code fixed to correctly
    show "if state->live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN" stop condition;
  - general wording improvements in section "Liveness marks tracking".

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230124220343.2942203-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230130182400.630997-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230131181118.733845-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/

Eduard Zingerman (1):
  docs/bpf: Add description of register liveness tracking algorithm

 Documentation/bpf/verifier.rst | 295 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 295 insertions(+)

-- 
2.39.0


             reply	other threads:[~2023-02-02 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-02 12:57 Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-02-02 12:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/1] docs/bpf: Add description of register liveness tracking algorithm Eduard Zingerman
2023-02-02 14:11   ` Edward Cree
2023-02-03  4:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/1] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230202125713.821931-1-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox