From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/1] bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:28:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230214212809.242632-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi,
This is the first attempt to solve the problems outlined in [1, 2, 3].
The main problem is that kfuncs in modules do not fit into bpf_insn.imm
on s390x; the secondary problem is that there is a conflict between
"abstract" XDP metadata function BTF ids and their "concrete"
addresses.
The proposed solution is to keep fkunc BTF ids in bpf_insn.imm, and put
the addresses into bpf_kfunc_desc, which does not have size
restrictions.
Jiri and I discussed putting them into bpf_insn_aux_data, but at the
very beginning of the implementation it became clear that this struct
is freed at the end of verification and is not available during JITing.
I regtested this only on s390x, where it does not regress anything. If
this approach is fine (especially w.r.t. dev-bound kfuncs), I can check
the other arches.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Y9%2FyrKZkBK6yzXp+@krava/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230128000650.1516334-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230128000650.1516334-32-iii@linux.ibm.com/
Best regards,
Ilya
Ilya Leoshkevich (1):
bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs
include/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
kernel/bpf/core.c | 23 ++++++++++---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 79 +++++++++++++------------------------------
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
--
2.39.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-02-14 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-14 21:28 Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2023-02-14 21:28 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/1] bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-02-14 23:58 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 10:07 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-02-15 17:43 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 17:49 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-02-15 18:33 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-02-15 21:54 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-02-15 21:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230214212809.242632-1-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox