From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@meta.com>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/7] bpf: Fix check_reg_type for PTR_TO_BTF_ID
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 21:06:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230221200646.2500777-6-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230221200646.2500777-1-memxor@gmail.com>
The current code does type matching for the case where reg->type is
PTR_TO_BTF_ID or has the PTR_TRUSTED flag. However, this only needs to
occur for non-MEM_ALLOC and non-MEM_PERCPU cases, but will include both
as per the current code.
The MEM_ALLOC case with or without PTR_TRUSTED needs to be handled
specially by the code for type_is_alloc case, while MEM_PERCPU case must
be ignored. Hence, to restore correct behavior and for clarity,
explicitly list out the handled PTR_TO_BTF_ID types which should be
handled for each case using a switch statement.
Helpers currently only take:
PTR_TO_BTF_ID
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | PTR_TRUSTED
This fix was also described (for the MEM_ALLOC case) in [0].
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221121160657.h6z7xuvedybp5y7s@apollo
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 6837657b46bf..8dbd20735e92 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6522,7 +6522,14 @@ static int check_reg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
return -EACCES;
found:
- if (reg->type == PTR_TO_BTF_ID || reg->type & PTR_TRUSTED) {
+ if (base_type(reg->type) != PTR_TO_BTF_ID)
+ return 0;
+
+ switch ((int)reg->type) {
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED:
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU:
+ {
/* For bpf_sk_release, it needs to match against first member
* 'struct sock_common', hence make an exception for it. This
* allows bpf_sk_release to work for multiple socket types.
@@ -6558,13 +6565,23 @@ static int check_reg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
return -EACCES;
}
}
- } else if (type_is_alloc(reg->type)) {
+ break;
+ }
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC:
if (meta->func_id != BPF_FUNC_spin_lock && meta->func_id != BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock) {
verbose(env, "verifier internal error: unimplemented handling of MEM_ALLOC\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
+ /* Handled by helper specific checks */
+ break;
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU:
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | PTR_TRUSTED:
+ /* Handled by helper specific checks */
+ break;
+ default:
+ verbose(env, "verifier internal error: invalid PTR_TO_BTF_ID register for type match\n");
+ return -EFAULT;
}
-
return 0;
}
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-21 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-21 20:06 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Add support for kptrs in more BPF maps Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-02-21 20:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/7] bpf: Support kptrs in percpu hashmap and percpu LRU hashmap Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-02-21 20:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/7] bpf: Support kptrs in local storage maps Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-02-22 20:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-02-21 20:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/7] bpf: Annotate data races in bpf_local_storage Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-02-21 20:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/7] bpf: Remove unused MEM_ALLOC | PTR_TRUSTED checks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-02-21 20:06 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2023-02-21 20:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/7] bpf: Wrap register invalidation with a helper Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-02-21 20:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add more tests for kptrs in maps Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-02-22 21:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/7] Add support for kptrs in more BPF maps patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230221200646.2500777-6-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davemarchevsky@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox