From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: dwarves@vger.kernel.org, arnaldo.melo@gmail.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH dwarves] dwarf_loader: Fix for BTF id drift caused by adding unspecified types
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 22:23:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230228202357.2766051-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
Recent changes to handle unspecified types (see [1]) cause BTF ID drift.
Specifically, the intent of commits [2], [3] and [4] is to render
references to unspecified types as void type.
However, as a consequence:
- in `die__process_unit()` call to `cu__add_tag()` allocates `small_id`
for unspecified type tags and adds these tags to `cu->types_table`;
- `btf_encoder__encode_tag()` skips generation of BTF entries for
`DW_TAG_unspecified_type` tags.
Such logic causes ID drift if unspecified type is not the last type
processed for compilation unit. `small_id` of each type following
unspecified type in the `cu->types_table` would have its BTF id off by -1.
Thus, rendering references established on recode phase invalid.
This commit reverts `unspecified_type` id/tag tracking.
Instead, the following is done:
- `small_id` for unspecified type tags is set to 0, thus reference to
unspecified type tag would render BTF id of a `void` on recode phase;
- unspecified type tags are not added to `cu->types_table`.
This change also happens to fix issue reported in [5], the gist of
that issue is that the field `encoder->unspecified_type` is set but
not reset by function `btf_encoder__encode_cu()`. Thus, the following
sequence of events might occur when BTF encoding is requested:
- CU with unspecified type is processed:
- unspecified type id is 42
- encoder->unspecified_type is set to 42
- CU without unspecified type is processed next using the same
`encoder` object:
- some `struct foo` has id 42 in this CU
- the references to `struct foo` are set 0 by function
`btf_encoder__tag_type()`.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y0R7uu3s%2FimnvPzM@kernel.org/
[2] bcc648a10cbc ("btf_encoder: Encode DW_TAG_unspecified_type returning routines as void")
[3] cffe5e1f75e1 ("core: Record if a CU has a DW_TAG_unspecified_type")
[4] 75e0fe28bb02 ("core: Add DW_TAG_unspecified_type to tag__is_tag_type() set")
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Y%2FP1yxAuV6Wj3A0K@google.com/
Fixes: bcc648a10cbc ("btf_encoder: Encode DW_TAG_unspecified_type returning routines as void")
Fixes: 52b25808e44a ("btf_encoder: Store type_id_off, unspecified type in encoder")
Tested-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
btf_encoder.c | 8 --------
dwarf_loader.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
dwarves.h | 8 --------
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/btf_encoder.c b/btf_encoder.c
index da776f4..07a9dc5 100644
--- a/btf_encoder.c
+++ b/btf_encoder.c
@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ struct btf_encoder {
const char *filename;
struct elf_symtab *symtab;
uint32_t type_id_off;
- uint32_t unspecified_type;
int saved_func_cnt;
bool has_index_type,
need_index_type,
@@ -635,11 +634,6 @@ static int32_t btf_encoder__tag_type(struct btf_encoder *encoder, uint32_t tag_t
if (tag_type == 0)
return 0;
- if (encoder->unspecified_type && tag_type == encoder->unspecified_type) {
- // No provision for encoding this, turn it into void.
- return 0;
- }
-
return encoder->type_id_off + tag_type;
}
@@ -1746,8 +1740,6 @@ int btf_encoder__encode_cu(struct btf_encoder *encoder, struct cu *cu, struct co
encoder->cu = cu;
encoder->type_id_off = btf__type_cnt(encoder->btf) - 1;
- if (encoder->cu->unspecified_type.tag)
- encoder->unspecified_type = encoder->cu->unspecified_type.type;
if (!encoder->has_index_type) {
/* cu__find_base_type_by_name() takes "type_id_t *id" */
diff --git a/dwarf_loader.c b/dwarf_loader.c
index 014e130..c37bd7b 100644
--- a/dwarf_loader.c
+++ b/dwarf_loader.c
@@ -2155,8 +2155,7 @@ static struct tag *__die__process_tag(Dwarf_Die *die, struct cu *cu,
case DW_TAG_atomic_type:
tag = die__create_new_tag(die, cu); break;
case DW_TAG_unspecified_type:
- cu->unspecified_type.tag =
- tag = die__create_new_tag(die, cu); break;
+ tag = die__create_new_tag(die, cu); break;
case DW_TAG_pointer_type:
tag = die__create_new_pointer_tag(die, cu, conf); break;
case DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type:
@@ -2219,13 +2218,27 @@ static int die__process_unit(Dwarf_Die *die, struct cu *cu, struct conf_load *co
continue;
}
- uint32_t id;
- cu__add_tag(cu, tag, &id);
+ uint32_t id = 0;
+ /* There is no BTF representation for unspecified types.
+ * Currently we want such types to be represented as `void`
+ * (and thus skip BTF encoding).
+ *
+ * As BTF encoding is skipped, such types must not be added to type table,
+ * otherwise an ID for a type would be allocated and we would be forced
+ * to put something in BTF at this ID.
+ * Thus avoid `cu__add_tag()` call for such types.
+ *
+ * On the other hand, there might be references to this type from other
+ * tags, so `dwarf_cu__find_tag_by_ref()` must return something.
+ * Thus call `cu__hash()` for such types.
+ *
+ * Note, that small_id of zero would be assigned to unspecified type entry.
+ */
+ if (tag->tag != DW_TAG_unspecified_type)
+ cu__add_tag(cu, tag, &id);
cu__hash(cu, tag);
struct dwarf_tag *dtag = tag->priv;
dtag->small_id = id;
- if (tag->tag == DW_TAG_unspecified_type)
- cu->unspecified_type.type = id;
} while (dwarf_siblingof(die, die) == 0);
return 0;
diff --git a/dwarves.h b/dwarves.h
index 5074cf8..e92b2fd 100644
--- a/dwarves.h
+++ b/dwarves.h
@@ -236,10 +236,6 @@ struct debug_fmt_ops {
#define ARCH_MAX_REGISTER_PARAMS 8
-/*
- * unspecified_type: If this CU has a DW_TAG_unspecified_type, as BTF doesn't have a representation for this
- * and thus we need to check functions returning this to convert it to void.
- */
struct cu {
struct list_head node;
struct list_head tags;
@@ -248,10 +244,6 @@ struct cu {
struct ptr_table functions_table;
struct ptr_table tags_table;
struct rb_root functions;
- struct {
- struct tag *tag;
- uint32_t type;
- } unspecified_type;
char *name;
char *filename;
void *priv;
--
2.39.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-02-28 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-28 20:23 Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-03-01 18:58 ` [PATCH dwarves] dwarf_loader: Fix for BTF id drift caused by adding unspecified types Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-01 21:19 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-03-02 18:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230228202357.2766051-1-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dwarves@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=mattbobrowski@google.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox