From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, horenc@vt.edu,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, houtao1@huawei.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/18] bpf: cpumap memory usage
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2023 12:46:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230305124615.12358-10-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230305124615.12358-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
A new helper is introduced to calculate cpumap memory usage. The size of
cpu_entries can be dynamically changed when we update or delete a cpumap
element, but this patch doesn't include the memory size of cpu_entry
yet. We can dynamically calculate the memory usage when we alloc or free
a cpu_entry, but it will take extra runtime overhead, so let just put it
aside currently. Note that the size of different cpu_entry may be
different as well.
The result as follows,
- before
48: cpumap name count_map flags 0x4
key 4B value 4B max_entries 64 memlock 4096B
- after
48: cpumap name count_map flags 0x4
key 4B value 4B max_entries 64 memlock 832B
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
index d2110c1..871809e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
@@ -673,6 +673,15 @@ static int cpu_map_redirect(struct bpf_map *map, u64 index, u64 flags)
__cpu_map_lookup_elem);
}
+static u64 cpu_map_mem_usage(const struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+ u64 usage = sizeof(struct bpf_cpu_map);
+
+ /* Currently the dynamically allocated elements are not counted */
+ usage += (u64)map->max_entries * sizeof(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *);
+ return usage;
+}
+
BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(cpu_map_btf_ids, struct, bpf_cpu_map)
const struct bpf_map_ops cpu_map_ops = {
.map_meta_equal = bpf_map_meta_equal,
@@ -683,6 +692,7 @@ static int cpu_map_redirect(struct bpf_map *map, u64 index, u64 flags)
.map_lookup_elem = cpu_map_lookup_elem,
.map_get_next_key = cpu_map_get_next_key,
.map_check_btf = map_check_no_btf,
+ .map_mem_usage = cpu_map_mem_usage,
.map_btf_id = &cpu_map_btf_ids[0],
.map_redirect = cpu_map_redirect,
};
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-05 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-05 12:45 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/18] bpf: bpf memory usage Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/18] bpf: add new map ops ->map_mem_usage Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/18] bpf: lpm_trie memory usage Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/18] bpf: hashtab " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/18] bpf: arraymap " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/18] bpf: stackmap " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/18] bpf: reuseport_array " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/18] bpf: ringbuf " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/18] bpf: bloom_filter " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/18] bpf: devmap " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/18] bpf: queue_stack_maps " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/18] bpf: bpf_struct_ops " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/18] bpf: local_storage " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 14/18] bpf, net: bpf_local_storage " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 15/18] bpf, net: sock_map " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 16/18] bpf, net: xskmap " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 17/18] bpf: offload map " Yafang Shao
2023-03-05 12:46 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 18/18] bpf: enforce all maps having memory usage callback Yafang Shao
2023-03-07 17:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/18] bpf: bpf memory usage patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230305124615.12358-10-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=horenc@vt.edu \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox