From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A037C678D4 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 18:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232463AbjCGSKZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2023 13:10:25 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46038 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232402AbjCGSKG (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2023 13:10:06 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f175.google.com (mail-qt1-f175.google.com [209.85.160.175]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9318FA4023 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 10:04:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-f175.google.com with SMTP id y10so15347476qtj.2 for ; Tue, 07 Mar 2023 10:04:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678212274; h=user-agent:content-disposition:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=0/38czkeiObNzAMYOqgk4npiUI9VZ61cIyHyNe2ksKE=; b=dWA0HdzmbUKpe/RLDkvpOBY4DdCft2HLBSg5aGoZSEtO5FsIaXO3KYB47PReJHP5AZ WvSKsqMLGvHrVa048orx+GrxmlUdngHp264HpGI2W7RwrJxyW59i/ldQVJS2v2CoM00e X4LhtLELLBv5aY4kQ9V7WGTJKDzHf9guImliLo+h5AQSZVyI/LAKfG99/ngvmY0Q8TNs kIieBZAQEtpC9aQyrwvS6sKxqe6tgm6c6/CZqPrK47+heW4W/txnfBp5u4a/Us4Q+96K tZ/17I09k2lPNmfwl5zkZfncnApZd0hG2/6v6uCc3Jcjw8Gql3SVGOIbzATDPMulDsba 1AuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXfVLuGrCf1OEfxllKbIfsuy063alqlr3w/d8/XdJNr12Xp5fsz aH6wGw6FFnQS/NkDwysmT+g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+qiTo+yFd+6Vv75gyL8ki3RkMYQoR011lxWsuaXaz+WLo7s1Za4vYN6tYLEN+ElNJ0+Sbt4g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:4c9:b0:3c0:40c1:e7bf with SMTP id q9-20020a05622a04c900b003c040c1e7bfmr96691qtx.22.1678212274530; Tue, 07 Mar 2023 10:04:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from maniforge ([2620:10d:c091:480::1:2c8e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i10-20020ac871ca000000b003bfb950f670sm9980501qtp.41.2023.03.07.10.04.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Mar 2023 10:04:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 12:04:32 -0600 From: David Vernet To: mattbobrowski@google.com Cc: zohar@linux.ibm.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, roberto.sassu@huawei.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: BPF CI regression in IMA Message-ID: <20230307180432.GB4387@maniforge> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.9 (2022-11-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Hi Matt, It seems that [0] has caused BPF CI runs to start failing in the IMA tests. See [1] for an example of a failed run. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y7T1hEhIL5TEmLEN@google.com/ [1]: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/4356022302/jobs/7614059918#step:6:6298 CC'ing KP and Robert who added the test. Thanks, David