Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/8] bpf: Update the struct_ops of a bpf_link.

Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-09T03:09:43Z

On 3/8/23 14:21, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 3/7/23 4:50 PM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
>> By improving the BPF_LINK_UPDATE command of bpf(), it should allow you
>> to conveniently switch between different struct_ops on a single
>> bpf_link. This would enable smoother transitions from one struct_ops
>> to another.
>>
>> The struct_ops maps passing along with BPF_LINK_UPDATE should have the
>> BPF_F_LINK flag.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/bpf.h            |  1 +
>>   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  8 ++++--
>>   kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c    | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   kernel/bpf/syscall.c           | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  7 +++++-
>>   5 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
>> index afca6c526fe4..29d555a82bad 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -1470,6 +1470,7 @@ struct bpf_link_ops {
>>       void (*show_fdinfo)(const struct bpf_link *link, struct seq_file
>> *seq);
>>       int (*fill_link_info)(const struct bpf_link *link,
>>                     struct bpf_link_info *info);
>> +    int (*update_map)(struct bpf_link *link, struct bpf_map *new_map);
>>   };
>>   struct bpf_tramp_link {
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> index f9fc7b8af3c4..edef9cf7d596 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -1555,8 +1555,12 @@ union bpf_attr {
>>       struct { /* struct used by BPF_LINK_UPDATE command */
>>           __u32        link_fd;    /* link fd */
>> -        /* new program fd to update link with */
>> -        __u32        new_prog_fd;
>> +        union {
>> +            /* new program fd to update link with */
>> +            __u32        new_prog_fd;
>> +            /* new struct_ops map fd to update link with */
>> +            __u32           new_map_fd;
>> +        };
>>           __u32        flags;        /* extra flags */
>>           /* expected link's program fd; is specified only if
>>            * BPF_F_REPLACE flag is set in flags */
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
>> index 5a7e86cf67b5..79e663869e51 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
>> @@ -775,10 +775,56 @@ static int
>> bpf_struct_ops_map_link_fill_link_info(const struct bpf_link *link,
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>> +static int bpf_struct_ops_map_link_update(struct bpf_link *link,
>> struct bpf_map *new_map)
>> +{
>> +    struct bpf_struct_ops_value *kvalue;
>> +    struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map, *old_st_map;
>> +    struct bpf_struct_ops_link *st_link;
>> +    struct bpf_map *old_map;
>> +    int err = 0;
>> +
>> +    if (new_map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS ||
>> +        !(new_map->map_flags & BPF_F_LINK))
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    mutex_lock(&update_mutex);
>> +
>> +    st_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_struct_ops_link, link);
>> +
>> +    /* The new and old struct_ops must be the same type. */
>> +    st_map = container_of(new_map, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, map);
>
> nit. move the st_link and st_map init out of the lock.
>

Ok

>> +
>> +    old_map = st_link->map;
>
> rcu_dereference_protected(...)
>
>> +    old_st_map = container_of(old_map, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, map);
>> +    if (st_map->st_ops != old_st_map->st_ops ||
>> +        /* Pair with smp_store_release() during map_update */
>> +        smp_load_acquire(&st_map->kvalue.state) !=
>> BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY) {
>
> nit. test the smp_load_acquire(&st_map...) outside of the lock.
> Do it together with the new_map checking at the beginning of the func.

Ok

>
>> +        err = -EINVAL;
>> +        goto err_out;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    kvalue = &st_map->kvalue;
>> +
>> +    err = st_map->st_ops->update(kvalue->data, old_st_map->kvalue.data);
>> +    if (err)
>> +        goto err_out;
>> +
>> +    bpf_map_inc(new_map);
>> +    rcu_assign_pointer(st_link->map, new_map);
>> +
>> +    bpf_map_put(old_map);
>> +
>> +err_out:
>> +    mutex_unlock(&update_mutex);
>> +
>> +    return err;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_struct_ops_map_lops = {
>>       .dealloc = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_dealloc,
>>       .show_fdinfo = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_show_fdinfo,
>>       .fill_link_info = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_fill_link_info,
>> +    .update_map = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_update,
>>   };
>>   int bpf_struct_ops_link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>> index 3a4503987a48..c087dd2e2c08 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>> @@ -4658,6 +4658,30 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr,
>> bpfptr_t uattr)
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>> +static int link_update_map(struct bpf_link *link, union bpf_attr *attr)
>> +{
>> +    struct bpf_map *new_map;
>> +    int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +    new_map = bpf_map_get(attr->link_update.new_map_fd);
>> +    if (IS_ERR(new_map))
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (new_map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS) {
>
> This is unnecessary test. The individual '.update_map()' should test for
> its own map_type and the new bpf_struct_ops_map_link_update() does test it.
>

Will remove it.

>> +        ret = -EINVAL;
>> +        goto out_put_map;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (link->ops->update_map)
>
> This has just been tested in link_update() before calling
> link_update_map().

Sure

>
>> +        ret = link->ops->update_map(link, new_map);
>> +    else
>> +        ret = -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +out_put_map:
>> +    bpf_map_put(new_map);
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>   #define BPF_LINK_UPDATE_LAST_FIELD link_update.old_prog_fd
>>   static int link_update(union bpf_attr *attr)
>> @@ -4670,14 +4694,25 @@ static int link_update(union bpf_attr *attr)
>>       if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_LINK_UPDATE))
>>           return -EINVAL;
>> -    flags = attr->link_update.flags;
>> -    if (flags & ~BPF_F_REPLACE)
>> -        return -EINVAL;
>> -
>>       link = bpf_link_get_from_fd(attr->link_update.link_fd);
>>       if (IS_ERR(link))
>>           return PTR_ERR(link);
>> +    flags = attr->link_update.flags;
>> +
>> +    if (link->ops->update_map) {
>> +        if (flags)    /* always replace the existing one */
>> +            ret = -EINVAL;
>> +        else
>> +            ret = link_update_map(link, attr);
>> +        goto out_put_link;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (flags & ~BPF_F_REPLACE) {
>> +        ret = -EINVAL;
>> +        goto out_put_link;
>> +    }
>> +
>>       new_prog = bpf_prog_get(attr->link_update.new_prog_fd);
>>       if (IS_ERR(new_prog)) {
>>           ret = PTR_ERR(new_prog);
>