From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/17] bpf: Add a few bpf mem allocator functions
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 22:59:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230308065936.1550103-13-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230308065936.1550103-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
This patch adds a few bpf mem allocator functions which will
be used in the bpf_local_storage in a later patch.
bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags(..., gfp_t flags) is added. When the
flags == GFP_KERNEL, it will fallback to __alloc(..., GFP_KERNEL).
bpf_local_storage knows its running context is sleepable (GFP_KERNEL)
and provides a better guarantee on memory allocation.
bpf_local_storage has some uncommon cases that its selem
cannot be reused immediately. It handles its own
rcu_head and goes through a rcu_trace gp and then free it.
bpf_mem_cache_raw_free() is added for direct free purpose
without leaking the LLIST_NODE_SZ internal knowledge.
During free time, the 'struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma' is no longer
available. However, the caller should know if it is
percpu memory or not and it can call different raw_free functions.
bpf_local_storage does not support percpu value, so only
the non-percpu 'bpf_mem_cache_raw_free()' is added in
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h | 2 ++
kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h b/include/linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h
index a7104af61ab4..3929be5743f4 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h
@@ -31,5 +31,7 @@ void bpf_mem_free(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, void *ptr);
/* kmem_cache_alloc/free equivalent: */
void *bpf_mem_cache_alloc(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma);
void bpf_mem_cache_free(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, void *ptr);
+void bpf_mem_cache_raw_free(void *ptr);
+void *bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, gfp_t flags);
#endif /* _BPF_MEM_ALLOC_H */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
index 5fcdacbb8439..2b78eed27c9c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
@@ -121,15 +121,8 @@ static struct llist_node notrace *__llist_del_first(struct llist_head *head)
return entry;
}
-static void *__alloc(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int node)
+static void *__alloc(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int node, gfp_t flags)
{
- /* Allocate, but don't deplete atomic reserves that typical
- * GFP_ATOMIC would do. irq_work runs on this cpu and kmalloc
- * will allocate from the current numa node which is what we
- * want here.
- */
- gfp_t flags = GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
-
if (c->percpu_size) {
void **obj = kmalloc_node(c->percpu_size, flags, node);
void *pptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(c->unit_size, 8, flags);
@@ -185,7 +178,12 @@ static void alloc_bulk(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int cnt, int node)
*/
obj = __llist_del_first(&c->free_by_rcu);
if (!obj) {
- obj = __alloc(c, node);
+ /* Allocate, but don't deplete atomic reserves that typical
+ * GFP_ATOMIC would do. irq_work runs on this cpu and kmalloc
+ * will allocate from the current numa node which is what we
+ * want here.
+ */
+ obj = __alloc(c, node, GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
if (!obj)
break;
}
@@ -676,3 +674,29 @@ void notrace bpf_mem_cache_free(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, void *ptr)
unit_free(this_cpu_ptr(ma->cache), ptr);
}
+
+void bpf_mem_cache_raw_free(void *ptr)
+{
+ kfree(ptr - LLIST_NODE_SZ);
+}
+
+void notrace *bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, gfp_t flags)
+{
+ struct bpf_mem_cache *c;
+ void *ret;
+
+ c = this_cpu_ptr(ma->cache);
+
+ ret = unit_alloc(c);
+ if (!ret && flags == GFP_KERNEL) {
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg, *old_memcg;
+
+ memcg = get_memcg(c);
+ old_memcg = set_active_memcg(memcg);
+ ret = __alloc(c, NUMA_NO_NODE, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
+ set_active_memcg(old_memcg);
+ mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+ }
+
+ return !ret ? NULL : ret + LLIST_NODE_SZ;
+}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-08 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-08 6:59 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/17] bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/17] bpf: Move a few bpf_local_storage functions to static scope Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/17] bpf: Refactor codes into bpf_local_storage_destroy Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/17] bpf: Remove __bpf_local_storage_map_alloc Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 04/17] bpf: Remove the preceding __ from __bpf_selem_unlink_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/17] bpf: Remember smap in bpf_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/17] bpf: Repurpose use_trace_rcu to reuse_now " Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/17] bpf: Remove bpf_selem_free_fields*_rcu Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 08/17] bpf: Add bpf_selem_free_rcu callback Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/17] bpf: Add bpf_selem_free() Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 10/17] bpf: Add bpf_local_storage_rcu callback Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 11/17] bpf: Add bpf_local_storage_free() Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2023-03-10 19:19 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/17] bpf: Add a few bpf mem allocator functions Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 13/17] bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_selem_alloc/free Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 14/17] bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free for bpf_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 15/17] selftests/bpf: Replace CHECK with ASSERT in test_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 16/17] selftests/bpf: Check freeing sk->sk_local_storage with sk_local_storage->smap is NULL Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 17/17] selftests/bpf: Add local-storage-create benchmark Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230308065936.1550103-13-martin.lau@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox