public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/17] bpf: Add a few bpf mem allocator functions
Date: Tue,  7 Mar 2023 22:59:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230308065936.1550103-13-martin.lau@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230308065936.1550103-1-martin.lau@linux.dev>

From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

This patch adds a few bpf mem allocator functions which will
be used in the bpf_local_storage in a later patch.

bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags(..., gfp_t flags) is added. When the
flags == GFP_KERNEL, it will fallback to __alloc(..., GFP_KERNEL).
bpf_local_storage knows its running context is sleepable (GFP_KERNEL)
and provides a better guarantee on memory allocation.

bpf_local_storage has some uncommon cases that its selem
cannot be reused immediately. It handles its own
rcu_head and goes through a rcu_trace gp and then free it.
bpf_mem_cache_raw_free() is added for direct free purpose
without leaking the LLIST_NODE_SZ internal knowledge.
During free time, the 'struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma' is no longer
available. However, the caller should know if it is
percpu memory or not and it can call different raw_free functions.
bpf_local_storage does not support percpu value, so only
the non-percpu 'bpf_mem_cache_raw_free()' is added in
this patch.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h |  2 ++
 kernel/bpf/memalloc.c         | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h b/include/linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h
index a7104af61ab4..3929be5743f4 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h
@@ -31,5 +31,7 @@ void bpf_mem_free(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, void *ptr);
 /* kmem_cache_alloc/free equivalent: */
 void *bpf_mem_cache_alloc(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma);
 void bpf_mem_cache_free(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, void *ptr);
+void bpf_mem_cache_raw_free(void *ptr);
+void *bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, gfp_t flags);
 
 #endif /* _BPF_MEM_ALLOC_H */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
index 5fcdacbb8439..2b78eed27c9c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
@@ -121,15 +121,8 @@ static struct llist_node notrace *__llist_del_first(struct llist_head *head)
 	return entry;
 }
 
-static void *__alloc(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int node)
+static void *__alloc(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int node, gfp_t flags)
 {
-	/* Allocate, but don't deplete atomic reserves that typical
-	 * GFP_ATOMIC would do. irq_work runs on this cpu and kmalloc
-	 * will allocate from the current numa node which is what we
-	 * want here.
-	 */
-	gfp_t flags = GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
-
 	if (c->percpu_size) {
 		void **obj = kmalloc_node(c->percpu_size, flags, node);
 		void *pptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(c->unit_size, 8, flags);
@@ -185,7 +178,12 @@ static void alloc_bulk(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int cnt, int node)
 		 */
 		obj = __llist_del_first(&c->free_by_rcu);
 		if (!obj) {
-			obj = __alloc(c, node);
+			/* Allocate, but don't deplete atomic reserves that typical
+			 * GFP_ATOMIC would do. irq_work runs on this cpu and kmalloc
+			 * will allocate from the current numa node which is what we
+			 * want here.
+			 */
+			obj = __alloc(c, node, GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 			if (!obj)
 				break;
 		}
@@ -676,3 +674,29 @@ void notrace bpf_mem_cache_free(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, void *ptr)
 
 	unit_free(this_cpu_ptr(ma->cache), ptr);
 }
+
+void bpf_mem_cache_raw_free(void *ptr)
+{
+	kfree(ptr - LLIST_NODE_SZ);
+}
+
+void notrace *bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, gfp_t flags)
+{
+	struct bpf_mem_cache *c;
+	void *ret;
+
+	c = this_cpu_ptr(ma->cache);
+
+	ret = unit_alloc(c);
+	if (!ret && flags == GFP_KERNEL) {
+		struct mem_cgroup *memcg, *old_memcg;
+
+		memcg = get_memcg(c);
+		old_memcg = set_active_memcg(memcg);
+		ret = __alloc(c, NUMA_NO_NODE, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
+		set_active_memcg(old_memcg);
+		mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+	}
+
+	return !ret ? NULL : ret + LLIST_NODE_SZ;
+}
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-08  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-08  6:59 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/17] bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/17] bpf: Move a few bpf_local_storage functions to static scope Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/17] bpf: Refactor codes into bpf_local_storage_destroy Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/17] bpf: Remove __bpf_local_storage_map_alloc Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 04/17] bpf: Remove the preceding __ from __bpf_selem_unlink_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/17] bpf: Remember smap in bpf_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/17] bpf: Repurpose use_trace_rcu to reuse_now " Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/17] bpf: Remove bpf_selem_free_fields*_rcu Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 08/17] bpf: Add bpf_selem_free_rcu callback Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/17] bpf: Add bpf_selem_free() Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 10/17] bpf: Add bpf_local_storage_rcu callback Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 11/17] bpf: Add bpf_local_storage_free() Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2023-03-10 19:19   ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/17] bpf: Add a few bpf mem allocator functions Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 13/17] bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free in bpf_selem_alloc/free Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 14/17] bpf: Use bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free for bpf_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 15/17] selftests/bpf: Replace CHECK with ASSERT in test_local_storage Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 16/17] selftests/bpf: Check freeing sk->sk_local_storage with sk_local_storage->smap is NULL Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-08  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 17/17] selftests/bpf: Add local-storage-create benchmark Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230308065936.1550103-13-martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox