From: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
<song@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@meta.com>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<sdf@google.com>
Cc: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 8/8] selftests/bpf: Test switching TCP Congestion Control algorithms.
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 20:38:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230310043812.3087672-9-kuifeng@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230310043812.3087672-1-kuifeng@meta.com>
Create a pair of sockets that utilize the congestion control algorithm
under a particular name. Then switch up this congestion control
algorithm to another implementation and check whether newly created
connections using the same cc name now run the new implementation.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@meta.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 171 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index e980188d4124..e53d611bbf06 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include "bpf_dctcp.skel.h"
#include "bpf_cubic.skel.h"
#include "bpf_tcp_nogpl.skel.h"
+#include "tcp_ca_update.skel.h"
#include "bpf_dctcp_release.skel.h"
#include "tcp_ca_write_sk_pacing.skel.h"
#include "tcp_ca_incompl_cong_ops.skel.h"
@@ -381,6 +382,90 @@ static void test_unsupp_cong_op(void)
libbpf_set_print(old_print_fn);
}
+static void test_update_ca(void)
+{
+ struct tcp_ca_update *skel;
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+ int saved_ca1_cnt;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = tcp_ca_update__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open"))
+ return;
+
+ link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
+ ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
+
+ do_test("tcp_ca_update", NULL);
+ saved_ca1_cnt = skel->bss->ca1_cnt;
+ ASSERT_GT(saved_ca1_cnt, 0, "ca1_ca1_cnt");
+
+ err = bpf_link__update_map(link, skel->maps.ca_update_2);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "update_map");
+
+ do_test("tcp_ca_update", NULL);
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ca1_cnt, saved_ca1_cnt, "ca2_ca1_cnt");
+ ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca2_cnt, 0, "ca2_ca2_cnt");
+
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+ tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_update_wrong(void)
+{
+ struct tcp_ca_update *skel;
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+ int saved_ca1_cnt;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = tcp_ca_update__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open"))
+ return;
+
+ link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
+ ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
+
+ do_test("tcp_ca_update", NULL);
+ saved_ca1_cnt = skel->bss->ca1_cnt;
+ ASSERT_GT(saved_ca1_cnt, 0, "ca1_ca1_cnt");
+
+ err = bpf_link__update_map(link, skel->maps.ca_wrong);
+ ASSERT_ERR(err, "update_map");
+
+ do_test("tcp_ca_update", NULL);
+ ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca1_cnt, saved_ca1_cnt, "ca2_ca1_cnt");
+
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+ tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_mixed_links(void)
+{
+ struct tcp_ca_update *skel;
+ struct bpf_link *link, *link_nl;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = tcp_ca_update__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open"))
+ return;
+
+ link_nl = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_no_link);
+ ASSERT_OK_PTR(link_nl, "attach_struct_ops_nl");
+
+ link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
+ ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
+
+ do_test("tcp_ca_update", NULL);
+ ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca1_cnt, 0, "ca1_ca1_cnt");
+
+ err = bpf_link__update_map(link, skel->maps.ca_no_link);
+ ASSERT_ERR(err, "update_map");
+
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+ bpf_link__destroy(link_nl);
+ tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
+}
+
void test_bpf_tcp_ca(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("dctcp"))
@@ -399,4 +484,10 @@ void test_bpf_tcp_ca(void)
test_incompl_cong_ops();
if (test__start_subtest("unsupp_cong_op"))
test_unsupp_cong_op();
+ if (test__start_subtest("update_ca"))
+ test_update_ca();
+ if (test__start_subtest("update_wrong"))
+ test_update_wrong();
+ if (test__start_subtest("mixed_links"))
+ test_mixed_links();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b93a0ed33057
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+int ca1_cnt = 0;
+int ca2_cnt = 0;
+
+static inline struct tcp_sock *tcp_sk(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return (struct tcp_sock *)sk;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_1_init")
+void BPF_PROG(ca_update_1_init, struct sock *sk)
+{
+ ca1_cnt++;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_2_init")
+void BPF_PROG(ca_update_2_init, struct sock *sk)
+{
+ ca2_cnt++;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_cong_control")
+void BPF_PROG(ca_update_cong_control, struct sock *sk,
+ const struct rate_sample *rs)
+{
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_ssthresh")
+__u32 BPF_PROG(ca_update_ssthresh, struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return tcp_sk(sk)->snd_ssthresh;
+}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_undo_cwnd")
+__u32 BPF_PROG(ca_update_undo_cwnd, struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return tcp_sk(sk)->snd_cwnd;
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct tcp_congestion_ops ca_update_1 = {
+ .init = (void *)ca_update_1_init,
+ .cong_control = (void *)ca_update_cong_control,
+ .ssthresh = (void *)ca_update_ssthresh,
+ .undo_cwnd = (void *)ca_update_undo_cwnd,
+ .name = "tcp_ca_update",
+};
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct tcp_congestion_ops ca_update_2 = {
+ .init = (void *)ca_update_2_init,
+ .cong_control = (void *)ca_update_cong_control,
+ .ssthresh = (void *)ca_update_ssthresh,
+ .undo_cwnd = (void *)ca_update_undo_cwnd,
+ .name = "tcp_ca_update",
+};
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct tcp_congestion_ops ca_wrong = {
+ .cong_control = (void *)ca_update_cong_control,
+ .ssthresh = (void *)ca_update_ssthresh,
+ .undo_cwnd = (void *)ca_update_undo_cwnd,
+ .name = "tcp_ca_wrong",
+};
+
+SEC(".struct_ops")
+struct tcp_congestion_ops ca_no_link = {
+ .cong_control = (void *)ca_update_cong_control,
+ .ssthresh = (void *)ca_update_ssthresh,
+ .undo_cwnd = (void *)ca_update_undo_cwnd,
+ .name = "tcp_ca_no_link",
+};
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-10 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-10 4:38 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/8] Transit between BPF TCP congestion controls Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-10 4:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/8] bpf: Retire the struct_ops map kvalue->refcnt Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-14 6:05 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-10 4:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/8] net: Update an existing TCP congestion control algorithm Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-10 16:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-03-13 15:46 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-13 16:43 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-14 0:28 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-14 4:31 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-10 4:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/8] bpf: Create links for BPF struct_ops maps Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-14 1:42 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-16 0:21 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-10 4:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/8] libbpf: Create a bpf_link in bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-10 4:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/8] bpf: Update the struct_ops of a bpf_link Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-10 4:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 6/8] libbpf: Update a bpf_link with another struct_ops Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-10 4:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 7/8] libbpf: Use .struct_ops.link section to indicate a struct_ops with a link Kui-Feng Lee
2023-03-10 4:38 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2023-03-14 5:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 8/8] selftests/bpf: Test switching TCP Congestion Control algorithms Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-10 16:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/8] Transit between BPF TCP congestion controls Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230310043812.3087672-9-kuifeng@meta.com \
--to=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox