[PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Add signed comparison example

[Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@googlemail.com>]

From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>

Improve clarity by adding an example of a signed comparison instruction

Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
---
 Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
index 5e43e14abe8..b4464058905 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
@@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ Documentation conventions
 =========================
 
 For brevity, this document uses the type notion "u64", "u32", etc.
-to mean an unsigned integer whose width is the specified number of bits.
+to mean an unsigned integer whose width is the specified number of bits,
+and "s32", etc. to mean a signed integer of the specified number of bits.
 
 Registers and calling convention
 ================================
@@ -264,6 +265,14 @@ BPF_JSLE  0xd0   PC += off if dst <= src    signed
 The eBPF program needs to store the return value into register R0 before doing a
 BPF_EXIT.
 
+Example:
+
+``BPF_JSGE | BPF_X | BPF_JMP32`` (0x7e) means::
+
+  if (s32)dst s>= (s32)src goto +offset
+
+where 's>=' indicates a signed '>=' comparison.
+
 Helper functions
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-- 
2.33.4