From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, bpf@ietf.org, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Bpf] [PATCH bpf-next v3] bpf, docs: Add docs on extended 64-bit immediate instructions
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 22:28:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230326032839.GF363182@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230325224305.2157-1-dthaler1968@googlemail.com>
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 10:43:05PM +0000, Dave Thaler wrote:
> From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
>
> Add docs on extended 64-bit immediate instructions, including six instructions
> previously undocumented. Include a brief description of map objects, and variables,
> as used by those instructions.
>
> ---
> V1 -> V2: rebased on top of latest master
>
> V2 -> V3: addressed comments from Alexei
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
> ---
> Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
> Documentation/bpf/linux-notes.rst | 13 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
> index db8789e6969..2c8347d63e7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
> @@ -385,14 +385,54 @@ and loaded back to ``R0``.
> -----------------------------
>
> Instructions with the ``BPF_IMM`` 'mode' modifier use the wide instruction
> -encoding for an extra imm64 value.
> -
> -There is currently only one such instruction.
> -
> -``BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM`` means::
> -
> - dst = imm64
> -
> +encoding defined in `Instruction encoding`_, and use the 'src' field of the
> +basic instruction to hold an opcode subtype.
> +
> +The following instructions are defined, and use additional concepts defined below:
nit: Perhaps this is a bit clearer? Wdyt?
The following opcode subtypes are defined for `BPF_IMM | BPF_DQ |
BPF_LD` instructions, with new terms such as "map" defined further
below:
> +
> +========================= ====== === ========================================= =========== ==============
> +opcode construction opcode src pseudocode imm type dst type
> +========================= ====== === ========================================= =========== ==============
> +BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x0 dst = imm64 integer integer
> +BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x1 dst = map_by_fd(imm) map fd map
> +BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x2 dst = map_val(map_by_fd(imm)) + next_imm map fd data pointer
> +BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x3 dst = var_addr(imm) variable id data pointer
> +BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x4 dst = code_addr(imm) integer code pointer
> +BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x5 dst = map_by_idx(imm) map index map
> +BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x6 dst = map_val(map_by_idx(imm)) + next_imm map index data pointer
> +========================= ====== === ========================================= =========== ==============
> +
> +where
> +
> +* map_by_fd(imm) means to convert a 32-bit POSIX file descriptor into an address of a map object (see `Map objects`_)
> +* map_by_idx(imm) means to convert a 32-bit index into an address of a map object
> +* map_val(map) gets the address of the first value in a given map object
> +* var_addr(imm) gets the address of a platform variable (see `Platform Variables`_) with a given id
> +* code_addr(imm) gets the address of the instruction at a specified relative offset in number of (64-bit) instructions
> +* the 'imm type' can be used by disassemblers for display
> +* the 'dst type' can be used for verification and JIT compilation purposes
> +
> +Map objects
> +~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +Maps are shared memory regions accessible by eBPF programs on some platforms, where we use the term "map object"
> +to refer to an object containing the data and metadata (e.g., size) about the memory region.
> +A map can have various semantics as defined in a separate document, and may or may not have a single
> +contiguous memory region, but the 'map_val(map)' is currently only defined for maps that do have a single
> +contiguous memory region.
> +
> +Each map object can have a POSIX file descriptor (fd) if supported by the platform,
> +where 'map_by_fd(imm)' means to get the map with the specified file descriptor.
> +Each BPF program can also be defined to use a set of maps associated with the program
> +at load time, and 'map_by_idx(imm)' means to get the map with the given index in the set
> +associated with the BPF program containing the instruction.
> +
> +Platform Variables
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +Platform variables are memory regions, identified by integer ids, exposed by the runtime and accessible by BPF programs on
> +some platforms. The 'var_addr(imm)' operation means to get the address of the memory region
> +identified by the given id.
>
> Legacy BPF Packet access instructions
> -------------------------------------
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/linux-notes.rst b/Documentation/bpf/linux-notes.rst
> index 956b0c86699..2d161467105 100644
> --- a/Documentation/bpf/linux-notes.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/linux-notes.rst
> @@ -12,6 +12,19 @@ Byte swap instructions
>
> ``BPF_FROM_LE`` and ``BPF_FROM_BE`` exist as aliases for ``BPF_TO_LE`` and ``BPF_TO_BE`` respectively.
>
> +Map objects
> +===========
> +
> +Linux only supports the 'map_val(map)' operation on array maps with a single element.
> +
> +Linux uses an fd_array to store maps associated with a BPF program. Thus,
> +map_by_index(index) uses the fd at that index in the array.
> +
> +Variables
> +=========
> +
> +Linux uses BTF ids to identify variables.
Not quite sure exactly what this means. Linux uses BTF ids to identify
_types_, right? This doesn't seem like something that needs to be
specified as Linux specific either, even if it's not yet supported
elsewhere. Certain legacy things such as Linux-specific helpers make
sense, but not sure about BTF ids.
> +
> Legacy BPF Packet access instructions
> =====================================
>
> --
> 2.33.4
>
> --
> Bpf mailing list
> Bpf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-26 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-25 22:43 [PATCH bpf-next v3] bpf, docs: Add docs on extended 64-bit immediate instructions Dave Thaler
2023-03-26 3:28 ` David Vernet [this message]
2023-03-26 5:00 ` [Bpf] " David Vernet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230326032839.GF363182@maniforge \
--to=void@manifault.com \
--cc=bpf@ietf.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dthaler1968=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org \
--cc=dthaler@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox