From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 11/48] tcp_bpf: Inline do_tcp_sendpages as it's now a wrapper around tcp_sendmsg
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 15:13:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230329141354.516864-12-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230329141354.516864-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
do_tcp_sendpages() is now just a small wrapper around tcp_sendmsg_locked(),
so inline it. This is part of replacing ->sendpage() with a call to
sendmsg() with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES set.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
---
net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
index cf26d65ca389..7f17134637eb 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -72,11 +72,13 @@ static int tcp_bpf_push(struct sock *sk, struct sk_msg *msg, u32 apply_bytes,
{
bool apply = apply_bytes;
struct scatterlist *sge;
+ struct msghdr msghdr = { .msg_flags = flags | MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, };
struct page *page;
int size, ret = 0;
u32 off;
while (1) {
+ struct bio_vec bvec;
bool has_tx_ulp;
sge = sk_msg_elem(msg, msg->sg.start);
@@ -88,16 +90,18 @@ static int tcp_bpf_push(struct sock *sk, struct sk_msg *msg, u32 apply_bytes,
tcp_rate_check_app_limited(sk);
retry:
has_tx_ulp = tls_sw_has_ctx_tx(sk);
- if (has_tx_ulp) {
- flags |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY;
- ret = kernel_sendpage_locked(sk,
- page, off, size, flags);
- } else {
- ret = do_tcp_sendpages(sk, page, off, size, flags);
- }
+ if (has_tx_ulp)
+ msghdr.msg_flags |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY;
+ if (flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST)
+ msghdr.msg_flags |= MSG_MORE;
+
+ bvec_set_page(&bvec, page, size, off);
+ iov_iter_bvec(&msghdr.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size);
+ ret = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msghdr, size);
if (ret <= 0)
return ret;
+
if (apply)
apply_bytes -= ret;
msg->sg.size -= ret;
@@ -398,7 +402,7 @@ static int tcp_bpf_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
long timeo;
int flags;
- /* Don't let internal do_tcp_sendpages() flags through */
+ /* Don't let internal sendpage flags through */
flags = (msg->msg_flags & ~MSG_SENDPAGE_DECRYPTED);
flags |= MSG_NO_SHARED_FRAGS;
next parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-29 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230329141354.516864-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
2023-03-29 14:13 ` David Howells [this message]
2023-03-29 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/48] tcp_bpf: Make tcp_bpf_sendpage() go through tcp_bpf_sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) David Howells
2023-03-29 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 48/48] sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) David Howells
2023-03-29 14:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-03-29 14:39 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230329141354.516864-12-dhowells@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox