From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: jbrouer@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
stephen@networkplumber.org, simon.horman@corigine.com,
sinquersw@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 2/2] net: introduce budget_squeeze to help us tune rx behavior
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:23:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230330092316.52bb7d6b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL+tcoCRn7RfzgrODp+qGv_sYEfv+=1G0Jm=yEoCoi5K8NfSSA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:59:46 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> I'm wondering for now if I can update and resend this patch to have a
> better monitor (actually we do need one) on this part since we have
> touched the net_rx_action() in the rps optimization patch series?
> Also, just like Jesper mentioned before, it can be considered as one
> 'fix' to a old problem but targetting to net-next is just fine. What
> do you think about it ?
Sorry, I don't understand what you're trying to say :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-15 9:20 [PATCH v4 net-next 0/2] add some detailed data when reading softnet_stat Jason Xing
2023-03-15 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 1/2] net-sysfs: display two backlog queue len separately Jason Xing
2023-03-19 3:05 ` Jason Xing
2023-03-20 18:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-21 1:49 ` Jason Xing
2023-03-15 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 2/2] net: introduce budget_squeeze to help us tune rx behavior Jason Xing
2023-03-17 0:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-17 2:27 ` Jason Xing
2023-03-17 3:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-17 4:11 ` Jason Xing
2023-03-17 4:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-18 4:00 ` Jason Xing
2023-03-20 13:30 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-20 18:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-21 2:08 ` Jason Xing
2023-03-30 9:59 ` Jason Xing
2023-03-30 16:23 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-03-31 0:48 ` Jason Xing
2023-03-31 2:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-31 2:33 ` Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230330092316.52bb7d6b@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jbrouer@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox