public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	memxor@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add testcases for ptr_*_or_null_ in bpf_kptr_xchg
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:52:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230330145203.80506-2-void@manifault.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230330145203.80506-1-void@manifault.com>

The second argument of the bpf_kptr_xchg() helper function is
ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL. A recent patch fixed a bug whereby the
verifier would fail with an internal error message if a program invoked
the helper with a PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL register. This testcase
adds some testcases to ensure that it fails gracefully moving forward.

Before the fix, these testcases would have failed an error resembling
the following:

; p = bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(&(unsigned long){0});
99: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r7       ; frame1: ...
100: (bf) r1 = r10                    ; frame1: ...
101: (07) r1 += -16                   ; frame1: ...
; p = bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(&(unsigned long){0});
102: (85) call bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire#13908
; frame1: R0_w=ptr_or_null_prog_test_ref_kfunc...
; p = bpf_kptr_xchg(&v->ref_ptr, p);
103: (bf) r1 = r6                     ; frame1: ...
104: (bf) r2 = r0
; frame1: R0_w=ptr_or_null_prog_test_ref_kfunc...
105: (85) call bpf_kptr_xchg#194
verifier internal error: invalid PTR_TO_BTF_ID register for type match

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_failure.c     | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c       | 23 +++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_failure.c
index db4f94e72b61..a9bf6ea336cf 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_failure.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_failure.c
@@ -165,3 +165,28 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_no_null_check, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("Possibly NULL pointer passed to helper arg2")
+int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_rcu_no_null_check, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	struct bpf_cpumask *prev, *curr;
+
+	curr = bpf_cpumask_create();
+	if (!curr)
+		return 0;
+
+	prev = bpf_kptr_xchg(&global_mask, curr);
+	if (prev)
+		bpf_cpumask_release(prev);
+
+	bpf_rcu_read_lock();
+	curr = global_mask;
+	/* PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_RCU passed to bpf_kptr_xchg() */
+	prev = bpf_kptr_xchg(&global_mask, curr);
+	bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+	if (prev)
+		bpf_cpumask_release(prev);
+
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c
index 08f9ec18c345..15bf3127dba3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct array_map {
 } array_map SEC(".maps");
 
 extern struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(unsigned long *sp) __ksym;
+extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p) __ksym;
 extern struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *
 bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc **p, int a, int b) __ksym;
 
@@ -442,4 +443,26 @@ int kptr_get_ref_state(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("Possibly NULL pointer passed to helper arg2")
+int kptr_xchg_possibly_null(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+	struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p;
+	struct map_value *v;
+	int key = 0;
+
+	v = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&array_map, &key);
+	if (!v)
+		return 0;
+
+	p = bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(&(unsigned long){0});
+
+	/* PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL passed to bpf_kptr_xchg() */
+	p = bpf_kptr_xchg(&v->ref_ptr, p);
+	if (p)
+		bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(p);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.39.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-30 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-30 14:52 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Handle PTR_MAYBE_NULL case in PTR_TO_BTF_ID helper call arg David Vernet
2023-03-30 14:52 ` David Vernet [this message]
2023-03-30 21:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230330145203.80506-2-void@manifault.com \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox