From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
memxor@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add testcases for ptr_*_or_null_ in bpf_kptr_xchg
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:52:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230330145203.80506-2-void@manifault.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230330145203.80506-1-void@manifault.com>
The second argument of the bpf_kptr_xchg() helper function is
ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL. A recent patch fixed a bug whereby the
verifier would fail with an internal error message if a program invoked
the helper with a PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL register. This testcase
adds some testcases to ensure that it fails gracefully moving forward.
Before the fix, these testcases would have failed an error resembling
the following:
; p = bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(&(unsigned long){0});
99: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r7 ; frame1: ...
100: (bf) r1 = r10 ; frame1: ...
101: (07) r1 += -16 ; frame1: ...
; p = bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(&(unsigned long){0});
102: (85) call bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire#13908
; frame1: R0_w=ptr_or_null_prog_test_ref_kfunc...
; p = bpf_kptr_xchg(&v->ref_ptr, p);
103: (bf) r1 = r6 ; frame1: ...
104: (bf) r2 = r0
; frame1: R0_w=ptr_or_null_prog_test_ref_kfunc...
105: (85) call bpf_kptr_xchg#194
verifier internal error: invalid PTR_TO_BTF_ID register for type match
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_failure.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_failure.c
index db4f94e72b61..a9bf6ea336cf 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_failure.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_failure.c
@@ -165,3 +165,28 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_no_null_check, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone
return 0;
}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("Possibly NULL pointer passed to helper arg2")
+int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_rcu_no_null_check, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+ struct bpf_cpumask *prev, *curr;
+
+ curr = bpf_cpumask_create();
+ if (!curr)
+ return 0;
+
+ prev = bpf_kptr_xchg(&global_mask, curr);
+ if (prev)
+ bpf_cpumask_release(prev);
+
+ bpf_rcu_read_lock();
+ curr = global_mask;
+ /* PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_RCU passed to bpf_kptr_xchg() */
+ prev = bpf_kptr_xchg(&global_mask, curr);
+ bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (prev)
+ bpf_cpumask_release(prev);
+
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c
index 08f9ec18c345..15bf3127dba3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct array_map {
} array_map SEC(".maps");
extern struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(unsigned long *sp) __ksym;
+extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p) __ksym;
extern struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *
bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc **p, int a, int b) __ksym;
@@ -442,4 +443,26 @@ int kptr_get_ref_state(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
return 0;
}
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("Possibly NULL pointer passed to helper arg2")
+int kptr_xchg_possibly_null(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+ struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p;
+ struct map_value *v;
+ int key = 0;
+
+ v = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&array_map, &key);
+ if (!v)
+ return 0;
+
+ p = bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(&(unsigned long){0});
+
+ /* PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL passed to bpf_kptr_xchg() */
+ p = bpf_kptr_xchg(&v->ref_ptr, p);
+ if (p)
+ bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(p);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.39.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-30 14:52 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Handle PTR_MAYBE_NULL case in PTR_TO_BTF_ID helper call arg David Vernet
2023-03-30 14:52 ` David Vernet [this message]
2023-03-30 21:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230330145203.80506-2-void@manifault.com \
--to=void@manifault.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox