From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E22C7618D for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 00:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234523AbjDFA0n (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2023 20:26:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45902 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234493AbjDFA0h (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2023 20:26:37 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D136A47 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 17:26:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1680740795; x=1712276795; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=y0HR/Gozx//xJ8/EGuGbmqITdsjjfBUtKstoI0tr++o=; b=VjzFF6B1OzQa8lo74KxchAu4HRKK1wWXleac13s9+BvgWMK//UJTZY5G XgSfFDzEwt4pG18duJ3vUJATFJWHUV29qas80CwThGrwZutvt5/Q5beps 90P/nfuSu0zO/Q2I5EnXQ534vPD+iKAECoG+7TRpabyLBjewH1/IxzGBU nyIBT81ikhV7i0mOC/Po2C7Ze+f6MByxH+N3NTqC4Tdy8zdqHiQ+ICwhe 92T/9EJ/xk0aLpD9NhcT6ud7Y+Q4eEN0F5wL57dHn9laqO9Z/owkc3pJN u9KgIepnXT0ZylLC4se+AxdxPFMrI0npUDsTP4g6nxpaCuA5ZY0BzNWIw g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10671"; a="342614791" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,322,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="342614791" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2023 17:26:35 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10671"; a="810805582" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,322,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="810805582" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b613635ddfff) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2023 17:26:31 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b613635ddfff with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pkDSR-000Qvw-04; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:26:31 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 08:25:35 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Ilya Leoshkevich , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Jiri Olsa , Stanislav Fomichev , Ilya Leoshkevich Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6] bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs Message-ID: <202304060822.L9VsdUzS-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230405213453.49756-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230405213453.49756-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Hi Ilya, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ilya-Leoshkevich/bpf-Support-64-bit-pointers-to-kfuncs/20230406-053713 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405213453.49756-1-iii%40linux.ibm.com patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6] bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs config: i386-randconfig-c001-20230403 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230406/202304060822.L9VsdUzS-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-8) 11.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/2a9559efd98d24493ac5c889a3ae03dd66b0de26 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Ilya-Leoshkevich/bpf-Support-64-bit-pointers-to-kfuncs/20230406-053713 git checkout 2a9559efd98d24493ac5c889a3ae03dd66b0de26 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 olddefconfig make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304060822.L9VsdUzS-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): ld: kernel/bpf/core.o: in function `bpf_jit_get_func_addr': >> kernel/bpf/core.c:1207: undefined reference to `bpf_get_kfunc_addr' vim +1207 kernel/bpf/core.c 1182 1183 int bpf_jit_get_func_addr(const struct bpf_prog *prog, 1184 const struct bpf_insn *insn, bool extra_pass, 1185 u64 *func_addr, bool *func_addr_fixed) 1186 { 1187 s16 off = insn->off; 1188 s32 imm = insn->imm; 1189 u8 *addr; 1190 int err; 1191 1192 *func_addr_fixed = insn->src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_CALL; 1193 if (!*func_addr_fixed) { 1194 /* Place-holder address till the last pass has collected 1195 * all addresses for JITed subprograms in which case we 1196 * can pick them up from prog->aux. 1197 */ 1198 if (!extra_pass) 1199 addr = NULL; 1200 else if (prog->aux->func && 1201 off >= 0 && off < prog->aux->func_cnt) 1202 addr = (u8 *)prog->aux->func[off]->bpf_func; 1203 else 1204 return -EINVAL; 1205 } else if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL && 1206 bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call()) { > 1207 err = bpf_get_kfunc_addr(prog, insn->imm, insn->off, &addr); 1208 if (err) 1209 return err; 1210 } else { 1211 /* Address of a BPF helper call. Since part of the core 1212 * kernel, it's always at a fixed location. __bpf_call_base 1213 * and the helper with imm relative to it are both in core 1214 * kernel. 1215 */ 1216 addr = (u8 *)__bpf_call_base + imm; 1217 } 1218 1219 *func_addr = (unsigned long)addr; 1220 return 0; 1221 } 1222 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests