BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: populate map_array_ro map for verifier_array_access test
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:23:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230420232317.2181776-5-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230420232317.2181776-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

Two test cases:
- "valid read map access into a read-only array 1" and
- "valid read map access into a read-only array 2"

Expect that map_array_ro map is filled with mock data. This logic was
not taken into acount during initial test conversion.

This commit modifies prog_tests/verifier.c entry point for this test
to fill the map.

Fixes: a3c830ae0209 ("selftests/bpf: verifier/array_access.c converted to inline assembly")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c       | 42 +++++++++++++++++--
 .../bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c         |  4 +-
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 25bc8958dbfe..7c68d78da9ea 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -44,8 +44,17 @@
 #include "verifier_xdp.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access.skel.h"
 
+#define MAX_ENTRIES 11
+
+struct test_val {
+	unsigned int index;
+	int foo[MAX_ENTRIES];
+};
+
 __maybe_unused
-static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name, skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_factory)
+static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name,
+			  skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_factory,
+			  pre_execution_cb pre_execution_cb)
 {
 	struct test_loader tester = {};
 	__u64 old_caps;
@@ -58,6 +67,7 @@ static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name, skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_fac
 		return;
 	}
 
+	test_loader__set_pre_execution_cb(&tester, pre_execution_cb);
 	test_loader__run_subtests(&tester, skel_name, elf_bytes_factory);
 	test_loader_fini(&tester);
 
@@ -66,10 +76,9 @@ static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name, skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_fac
 		PRINT_FAIL("failed to restore CAP_SYS_ADMIN: %i, %s\n", err, strerror(err));
 }
 
-#define RUN(skel) run_tests_aux(#skel, skel##__elf_bytes)
+#define RUN(skel) run_tests_aux(#skel, skel##__elf_bytes, NULL)
 
 void test_verifier_and(void)                  { RUN(verifier_and); }
-void test_verifier_array_access(void)         { RUN(verifier_array_access); }
 void test_verifier_basic_stack(void)          { RUN(verifier_basic_stack); }
 void test_verifier_bounds_deduction(void)     { RUN(verifier_bounds_deduction); }
 void test_verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const(void)     { RUN(verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const); }
@@ -108,3 +117,30 @@ void test_verifier_var_off(void)              { RUN(verifier_var_off); }
 void test_verifier_xadd(void)                 { RUN(verifier_xadd); }
 void test_verifier_xdp(void)                  { RUN(verifier_xdp); }
 void test_verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access(void) { RUN(verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access); }
+
+static int init_array_access_maps(struct bpf_object *obj)
+{
+	struct bpf_map *array_ro;
+	struct test_val value = {
+		.index = (6 + 1) * sizeof(int),
+		.foo[6] = 0xabcdef12,
+	};
+	int err, key = 0;
+
+	array_ro = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "map_array_ro");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(array_ro, "lookup map_array_ro"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(array_ro), &key, &value, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "map_array_ro update"))
+		return err;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void test_verifier_array_access(void)
+{
+	run_tests_aux("verifier_array_access",
+		      verifier_array_access__elf_bytes,
+		      init_array_access_maps);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c
index fceeeef78721..95d7ecc12963 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ l0_%=:	exit;						\
 
 SEC("socket")
 __description("valid read map access into a read-only array 1")
-__success __success_unpriv /* __retval(28) temporarily disable */
+__success __success_unpriv __retval(28)
 __naked void a_read_only_array_1_1(void)
 {
 	asm volatile ("					\
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ l0_%=:	exit;						\
 
 SEC("tc")
 __description("valid read map access into a read-only array 2")
-__success /* __retval(65507) temporarily disable */
+__success __retval(65507)
 __naked void a_read_only_array_2_1(void)
 {
 	asm volatile ("					\
-- 
2.40.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-20 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-20 23:23 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] fix __retval() being always ignored Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-20 23:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: disable program test run for progs/refcounted_kptr.c Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-20 23:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: fix __retval() being always ignored Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-20 23:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: add pre bpf_prog_test_run_opts() callback for test_loader Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-20 23:23 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-04-21  2:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] fix __retval() being always ignored patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230420232317.2181776-5-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox