public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] selftests/bpf: Update EFAULT {g,s}etsockopt selftests
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 13:04:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230427200409.1785263-3-sdf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230427200409.1785263-1-sdf@google.com>

Instead of assuming EFAULT, let's assume the BPF program's
output is ignored.

Remove "getsockopt: deny arbitrary ctx->retval" because it
was actually testing optlen. We have separate set of tests
for retval.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c        | 80 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
index aa4debf62fc6..8dad30ce910e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
@@ -273,10 +273,30 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 		.error = EFAULT_GETSOCKOPT,
 	},
 	{
-		.descr = "getsockopt: deny arbitrary ctx->retval",
+		.descr = "getsockopt: ignore >PAGE_SIZE optlen",
 		.insns = {
-			/* ctx->retval = 123 */
-			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 123),
+			/* write 0xFF to the first optval byte */
+
+			/* r6 = ctx->optval */
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct bpf_sockopt, optval)),
+			/* r2 = ctx->optval */
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_6),
+			/* r6 = ctx->optval + 1 */
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, 1),
+
+			/* r7 = ctx->optval_end */
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct bpf_sockopt, optval_end)),
+
+			/* if (ctx->optval + 1 <= ctx->optval_end) { */
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7, 1),
+			/* ctx->optval[0] = 0xF0 */
+			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0xFF),
+			/* } */
+
+			/* ctx->retval = 0 */
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
 			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
 				    offsetof(struct bpf_sockopt, retval)),
 
@@ -287,9 +307,10 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 		.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT,
 		.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT,
 
-		.get_optlen = 64,
-
-		.error = EFAULT_GETSOCKOPT,
+		.get_level = 1234,
+		.get_optname = 5678,
+		.get_optval = {}, /* the changes are ignored */
+		.get_optlen = 4096 + 1,
 	},
 	{
 		.descr = "getsockopt: support smaller ctx->optlen",
@@ -648,6 +669,49 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
 
 		.error = EFAULT_SETSOCKOPT,
 	},
+	{
+		.descr = "setsockopt: ignore >PAGE_SIZE optlen",
+		.insns = {
+			/* write 0xFF to the first optval byte */
+
+			/* r6 = ctx->optval */
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct bpf_sockopt, optval)),
+			/* r2 = ctx->optval */
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_6),
+			/* r6 = ctx->optval + 1 */
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, 1),
+
+			/* r7 = ctx->optval_end */
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct bpf_sockopt, optval_end)),
+
+			/* if (ctx->optval + 1 <= ctx->optval_end) { */
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7, 1),
+			/* ctx->optval[0] = 0xF0 */
+			BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0xFF),
+			/* } */
+
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT,
+		.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT,
+
+		.set_level = SOL_IP,
+		.set_optname = IP_TOS,
+		.set_optval = { 1 << 3 },
+		.set_optlen = 4096 + 1,
+
+		.get_level = SOL_IP,
+		.get_optname = IP_TOS,
+#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+		.get_optval = { 1 << 3, 0, 0, 0 }, /* the changes are ignored */
+#else
+		.get_optval = { 0, 0, 0, 1 << 3 }, /* the changes are ignored */
+#endif
+		.get_optlen = 4,
+	},
 	{
 		.descr = "setsockopt: allow changing ctx->optlen within bounds",
 		.insns = {
@@ -922,6 +986,7 @@ static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test)
 
 	if (test->get_optlen) {
 		optval = malloc(test->get_optlen);
+		memset(optval, 0, test->get_optlen);
 		socklen_t optlen = test->get_optlen;
 		socklen_t expected_get_optlen = test->get_optlen_ret ?:
 			test->get_optlen;
@@ -946,6 +1011,9 @@ static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test)
 			goto free_optval;
 		}
 
+		if (optlen > sizeof(test->get_optval))
+			optlen = sizeof(test->get_optval);
+
 		if (memcmp(optval, test->get_optval, optlen) != 0) {
 			errno = 0;
 			log_err("getsockopt returned unexpected optval");
-- 
2.40.1.495.gc816e09b53d-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-27 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-27 20:04 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf: Don't EFAULT for {g,s}setsockopt with wrong optlen Stanislav Fomichev
2023-04-27 20:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] " Stanislav Fomichev
2023-05-01  5:51   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-05-01 16:55     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-05-01 18:58       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-05-01 19:33         ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-04-27 20:04 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2023-04-28 23:57   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] selftests/bpf: Update EFAULT {g,s}etsockopt selftests Martin KaFai Lau
2023-04-28 23:59     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-04-29  0:32       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-04-29  0:44         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-05-01 17:22           ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-05-01 19:04             ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-04-27 20:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] selftests/bpf: Correctly handle optlen > 4096 Stanislav Fomichev
2023-04-27 20:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] bpf: Document EFAULT changes for sockopt Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230427200409.1785263-3-sdf@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox