public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 10/10] bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs to bpf_testmod
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 21:22:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230516022230.GA3834@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230515133756.1658301-11-jolsa@kernel.org>

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 03:37:56PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Moving kernel test kfuncs into bpf_testmod kernel module, and adding
> necessary init calls and BTF IDs records.
> 
> We need to keep following structs in kernel:
>   struct prog_test_ref_kfunc
>   struct prog_test_member (embedded in prog_test_ref_kfunc)
> 
> The reason is because they need to be marked as rcu safe (check test
> prog mark_ref_as_untrusted_or_null) and such objects are being required
> to be defined only in kernel at the moment (see rcu_safe_kptr check
> in kernel).
> 
> We need to keep also dtor functions for both objects in kernel:
>   bpf_kfunc_call_test_release
>   bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release
> 
> We also keep the copy of these struct in bpf_testmod_kfunc.h, because
> other test functions use them. This is unfortunate, but this is just
> temporary solution until we are able to these structs them to bpf_testmod
> completely.
> 
> As suggested by David adding bpf_testmod.ko make dependency for
> bpf programs, so they are rebuilt if we change the bpf_testmod.ko
> module.
> 
> Also adding missing __bpf_kfunc to bpf_kfunc_call_test4 functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-16  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-15 13:37 [PATCHv4 bpf-next 00/10] bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs into bpf_testmod Jiri Olsa
2023-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 01/10] libbpf: Store zero fd to fd_array for loader kfunc relocation Jiri Olsa
2023-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 02/10] selftests/bpf: Move kfunc exports to bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h Jiri Olsa
2023-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 03/10] selftests/bpf: Move test_progs helpers to testing_helpers object Jiri Olsa
2023-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 04/10] selftests/bpf: Use only stdout in un/load_bpf_testmod functions Jiri Olsa
2023-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 05/10] selftests/bpf: Do not unload bpf_testmod in load_bpf_testmod Jiri Olsa
2023-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 06/10] selftests/bpf: Use un/load_bpf_testmod functions in tests Jiri Olsa
2023-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 07/10] selftests/bpf: Load bpf_testmod for verifier test Jiri Olsa
2023-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 08/10] selftests/bpf: Allow to use kfunc from testmod.ko in test_verifier Jiri Olsa
2023-05-16 21:45   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-17  5:17     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-05-17 14:27     ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-05-17 16:51       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 09/10] selftests/bpf: Remove extern from kfuncs declarations Jiri Olsa
2023-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 10/10] bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs to bpf_testmod Jiri Olsa
2023-05-16  2:22   ` David Vernet [this message]
2023-05-17  5:20 ` [PATCHv4 bpf-next 00/10] bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs into bpf_testmod patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230516022230.GA3834@maniforge \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox