public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com>,
	Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
	"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/17] bpf: Support new signed div/mod instructions.
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:07:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230726220753.1093703-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230726220726.1089817-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

Add interpreter/jit support for new signed div/mod insns.
The new signed div/mod instructions are encoded with
unsigned div/mod instructions plus insn->off == 1.
Also add basic verifier support to ensure new insns get
accepted.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c |  27 ++++++---
 kernel/bpf/core.c           | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c       |   6 +-
 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 4942a4c188b9..a89b62eb2b40 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1194,15 +1194,26 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image
 				/* mov rax, dst_reg */
 				emit_mov_reg(&prog, is64, BPF_REG_0, dst_reg);
 
-			/*
-			 * xor edx, edx
-			 * equivalent to 'xor rdx, rdx', but one byte less
-			 */
-			EMIT2(0x31, 0xd2);
+			if (insn->off == 0) {
+				/*
+				 * xor edx, edx
+				 * equivalent to 'xor rdx, rdx', but one byte less
+				 */
+				EMIT2(0x31, 0xd2);
 
-			/* div src_reg */
-			maybe_emit_1mod(&prog, src_reg, is64);
-			EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xF0, src_reg));
+				/* div src_reg */
+				maybe_emit_1mod(&prog, src_reg, is64);
+				EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xF0, src_reg));
+			} else {
+				if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU)
+					EMIT1(0x99); /* cdq */
+				else
+					EMIT2(0x48, 0x99); /* cqo */
+
+				/* idiv src_reg */
+				maybe_emit_1mod(&prog, src_reg, is64);
+				EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xF8, src_reg));
+			}
 
 			if (BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_MOD &&
 			    dst_reg != BPF_REG_3)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index ad58697cec4b..3fe895199f6e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1792,36 +1792,114 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
 		(*(s64 *) &DST) >>= IMM;
 		CONT;
 	ALU64_MOD_X:
-		div64_u64_rem(DST, SRC, &AX);
-		DST = AX;
+		switch (OFF) {
+		case 0:
+			div64_u64_rem(DST, SRC, &AX);
+			DST = AX;
+			break;
+		case 1:
+			AX = div64_s64(DST, SRC);
+			DST = DST - AX * SRC;
+			break;
+		}
 		CONT;
 	ALU_MOD_X:
-		AX = (u32) DST;
-		DST = do_div(AX, (u32) SRC);
+		switch (OFF) {
+		case 0:
+			AX = (u32) DST;
+			DST = do_div(AX, (u32) SRC);
+			break;
+		case 1:
+			AX = abs((s32)DST);
+			AX = do_div(AX, abs((s32)SRC));
+			if ((s32)DST < 0)
+				DST = (u32)-AX;
+			else
+				DST = (u32)AX;
+			break;
+		}
 		CONT;
 	ALU64_MOD_K:
-		div64_u64_rem(DST, IMM, &AX);
-		DST = AX;
+		switch (OFF) {
+		case 0:
+			div64_u64_rem(DST, IMM, &AX);
+			DST = AX;
+			break;
+		case 1:
+			AX = div64_s64(DST, IMM);
+			DST = DST - AX * IMM;
+			break;
+		}
 		CONT;
 	ALU_MOD_K:
-		AX = (u32) DST;
-		DST = do_div(AX, (u32) IMM);
+		switch (OFF) {
+		case 0:
+			AX = (u32) DST;
+			DST = do_div(AX, (u32) IMM);
+			break;
+		case 1:
+			AX = abs((s32)DST);
+			AX = do_div(AX, abs((s32)IMM));
+			if ((s32)DST < 0)
+				DST = (u32)-AX;
+			else
+				DST = (u32)AX;
+			break;
+		}
 		CONT;
 	ALU64_DIV_X:
-		DST = div64_u64(DST, SRC);
+		switch (OFF) {
+		case 0:
+			DST = div64_u64(DST, SRC);
+			break;
+		case 1:
+			DST = div64_s64(DST, SRC);
+			break;
+		}
 		CONT;
 	ALU_DIV_X:
-		AX = (u32) DST;
-		do_div(AX, (u32) SRC);
-		DST = (u32) AX;
+		switch (OFF) {
+		case 0:
+			AX = (u32) DST;
+			do_div(AX, (u32) SRC);
+			DST = (u32) AX;
+			break;
+		case 1:
+			AX = abs((s32)DST);
+			do_div(AX, abs((s32)SRC));
+			if ((s32)DST < 0 == (s32)SRC < 0)
+				DST = (u32)AX;
+			else
+				DST = (u32)-AX;
+			break;
+		}
 		CONT;
 	ALU64_DIV_K:
-		DST = div64_u64(DST, IMM);
+		switch (OFF) {
+		case 0:
+			DST = div64_u64(DST, IMM);
+			break;
+		case 1:
+			DST = div64_s64(DST, IMM);
+			break;
+		}
 		CONT;
 	ALU_DIV_K:
-		AX = (u32) DST;
-		do_div(AX, (u32) IMM);
-		DST = (u32) AX;
+		switch (OFF) {
+		case 0:
+			AX = (u32) DST;
+			do_div(AX, (u32) IMM);
+			DST = (u32) AX;
+			break;
+		case 1:
+			AX = abs((s32)DST);
+			do_div(AX, abs((s32)IMM));
+			if ((s32)DST < 0 == (s32)IMM < 0)
+				DST = (u32)AX;
+			else
+				DST = (u32)-AX;
+			break;
+		}
 		CONT;
 	ALU_END_TO_BE:
 		switch (IMM) {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a3dcaeed8217..c0aceedfcb9c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -13237,7 +13237,8 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 	} else {	/* all other ALU ops: and, sub, xor, add, ... */
 
 		if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
-			if (insn->imm != 0 || insn->off != 0) {
+			if (insn->imm != 0 || insn->off > 1 ||
+			    (insn->off == 1 && opcode != BPF_MOD && opcode != BPF_DIV)) {
 				verbose(env, "BPF_ALU uses reserved fields\n");
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
@@ -13246,7 +13247,8 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 			if (err)
 				return err;
 		} else {
-			if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0) {
+			if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off > 1 ||
+			    (insn->off == 1 && opcode != BPF_MOD && opcode != BPF_DIV)) {
 				verbose(env, "BPF_ALU uses reserved fields\n");
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-26 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-26 22:07 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/17] bpf: Support new insns from cpu v4 Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/17] bpf: Support new sign-extension load insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/17] bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/17] bpf: Handle sign-extenstin ctx member accesses Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/17] bpf: Support new unconditional bswap instruction Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:07 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2023-07-26 22:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/17] bpf: Fix jit blinding with new sdiv/smov insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/17] bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/17] selftests/bpf: Fix a test_verifier failure Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/17] selftests/bpf: Add a cpuv4 test runner for cpu=v4 testing Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/17] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sign-extension load insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/17] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sign-extension mov insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/17] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new bswap insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 14/17] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new sdiv/smod insns Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 15/17] selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for new gotol insn Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 16/17] selftests/bpf: Test ldsx with more complex cases Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 17/17] docs/bpf: Add documentation for new instructions Yonghong Song
2023-07-26 22:19   ` Dave Thaler
2023-07-26 22:19     ` [Bpf] " Dave Thaler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230726220753.1093703-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=david.faust@oracle.com \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=maskray@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox