From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: martin.lau@linux.dev
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for detachment on empty mprog entry
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 15:11:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230804131112.11012-2-daniel@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230804131112.11012-1-daniel@iogearbox.net>
Add a detachment test case with miniq present to assert that with and
without the miniq we get the same error.
# ./test_progs -t tc_opts
#244 tc_opts_after:OK
#245 tc_opts_append:OK
#246 tc_opts_basic:OK
#247 tc_opts_before:OK
#248 tc_opts_chain_classic:OK
#249 tc_opts_delete_empty:OK
#250 tc_opts_demixed:OK
#251 tc_opts_detach:OK
#252 tc_opts_detach_after:OK
#253 tc_opts_detach_before:OK
#254 tc_opts_dev_cleanup:OK
#255 tc_opts_invalid:OK
#256 tc_opts_mixed:OK
#257 tc_opts_prepend:OK
#258 tc_opts_replace:OK
#259 tc_opts_revision:OK
Summary: 16/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_opts.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_opts.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_opts.c
index 7914100f9b46..39bd253e41aa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_opts.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_opts.c
@@ -2237,3 +2237,34 @@ void serial_test_tc_opts_detach_after(void)
test_tc_opts_detach_after_target(BPF_TCX_INGRESS);
test_tc_opts_detach_after_target(BPF_TCX_EGRESS);
}
+
+static void test_tc_opts_delete_empty(int target, bool chain_tc_old)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, tc_hook, .ifindex = loopback);
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_detach_opts, optd);
+ int err;
+
+ assert_mprog_count(target, 0);
+ if (chain_tc_old) {
+ tc_hook.attach_point = target == BPF_TCX_INGRESS ?
+ BPF_TC_INGRESS : BPF_TC_EGRESS;
+ err = bpf_tc_hook_create(&tc_hook);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_tc_hook_create");
+ __assert_mprog_count(target, 0, true, loopback);
+ }
+ err = bpf_prog_detach_opts(0, loopback, target, &optd);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOENT, "prog_detach");
+ if (chain_tc_old) {
+ tc_hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS | BPF_TC_EGRESS;
+ bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&tc_hook);
+ }
+ assert_mprog_count(target, 0);
+}
+
+void serial_test_tc_opts_delete_empty(void)
+{
+ test_tc_opts_delete_empty(BPF_TCX_INGRESS, false);
+ test_tc_opts_delete_empty(BPF_TCX_EGRESS, false);
+ test_tc_opts_delete_empty(BPF_TCX_INGRESS, true);
+ test_tc_opts_delete_empty(BPF_TCX_EGRESS, true);
+}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-04 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-04 13:11 [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix mprog detachment for empty mprog entry Daniel Borkmann
2023-08-04 13:11 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2023-08-04 16:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230804131112.11012-2-daniel@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox