From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 04/15] bpf: Add bpf_this_cpu_ptr/bpf_per_cpu_ptr support for allocated percpu obj
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:28:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230814172830.1363918-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814172809.1361446-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
The bpf helpers bpf_this_cpu_ptr() and bpf_per_cpu_ptr() are re-purposed
for allocated percpu objects. For an allocated percpu obj,
the reg type is 'PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | MEM_RCU'.
The return type for these two re-purposed helpera is
'PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RCU | MEM_ALLOC'.
The MEM_ALLOC allows that the per-cpu data can be read and written.
Since the memory allocator bpf_mem_alloc() returns
a ptr to a percpu ptr for percpu data, the first argument
of bpf_this_cpu_ptr() and bpf_per_cpu_ptr() is patched
with a dereference before passing to the helper func.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 1 +
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index f70f9ac884d2..e23480db37ec 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -480,6 +480,7 @@ struct bpf_insn_aux_data {
bool zext_dst; /* this insn zero extends dst reg */
bool storage_get_func_atomic; /* bpf_*_storage_get() with atomic memory alloc */
bool is_iter_next; /* bpf_iter_<type>_next() kfunc call */
+ bool percpu_ptr_prog_alloc; /* {this,per}_cpu_ptr() with prog alloc */
u8 alu_state; /* used in combination with alu_limit */
/* below fields are initialized once */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a985fbf18a11..6fc200cb68b6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6221,7 +6221,7 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
}
if (type_is_alloc(reg->type) && !type_is_non_owning_ref(reg->type) &&
- !reg->ref_obj_id) {
+ !(reg->type & MEM_RCU) && !reg->ref_obj_id) {
verbose(env, "verifier internal error: ref_obj_id for allocated object must be non-zero\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
@@ -7765,6 +7765,7 @@ static const struct bpf_reg_types btf_ptr_types = {
static const struct bpf_reg_types percpu_btf_ptr_types = {
.types = {
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU,
+ PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | MEM_RCU,
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | PTR_TRUSTED,
}
};
@@ -7945,6 +7946,7 @@ static int check_reg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
return -EACCES;
break;
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU:
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | MEM_RCU:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | PTR_TRUSTED:
/* Handled by helper specific checks */
break;
@@ -8287,6 +8289,16 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
verbose(env, "Helper has invalid btf_id in R%d\n", regno);
return -EACCES;
}
+ if (reg->type & MEM_RCU) {
+ const struct btf_type *type = btf_type_by_id(reg->btf, reg->btf_id);
+
+ if (!type || !btf_type_is_struct(type)) {
+ verbose(env, "Helper has invalid btf/btf_id in R%d\n", regno);
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+ env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].percpu_ptr_prog_alloc = true;
+ }
+
meta->ret_btf = reg->btf;
meta->ret_btf_id = reg->btf_id;
break;
@@ -9888,14 +9900,18 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MEM | ret_flag;
regs[BPF_REG_0].mem_size = tsize;
} else {
- /* MEM_RDONLY may be carried from ret_flag, but it
- * doesn't apply on PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Fold it, otherwise
- * it will confuse the check of PTR_TO_BTF_ID in
- * check_mem_access().
- */
- ret_flag &= ~MEM_RDONLY;
+ if (env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].percpu_ptr_prog_alloc) {
+ regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | MEM_RCU;
+ } else {
+ /* MEM_RDONLY may be carried from ret_flag, but it
+ * doesn't apply on PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Fold it, otherwise
+ * it will confuse the check of PTR_TO_BTF_ID in
+ * check_mem_access().
+ */
+ ret_flag &= ~MEM_RDONLY;
+ regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | ret_flag;
+ }
- regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | ret_flag;
regs[BPF_REG_0].btf = meta.ret_btf;
regs[BPF_REG_0].btf_id = meta.ret_btf_id;
}
@@ -18646,6 +18662,25 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
goto patch_call_imm;
}
+ /* bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr() */
+ if (env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].percpu_ptr_prog_alloc) {
+ /* patch with 'r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0)' since for percpu data,
+ * bpf_mem_alloc() returns a ptr to the percpu data ptr.
+ */
+ insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, 0);
+ insn_buf[1] = *insn;
+ cnt = 2;
+
+ new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
+ if (!new_prog)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ delta += cnt - 1;
+ env->prog = prog = new_prog;
+ insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta;
+ goto patch_call_imm;
+ }
+
/* BPF_EMIT_CALL() assumptions in some of the map_gen_lookup
* and other inlining handlers are currently limited to 64 bit
* only.
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-14 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-14 17:28 [PATCH bpf-next 00/15] Add support for local percpu kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/15] bpf: Add support for non-fix-size percpu mem allocation Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/15] bpf: Add BPF_KPTR_PERCPU_REF as a field type Yonghong Song
2023-08-18 18:37 ` David Marchevsky
2023-08-18 23:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-20 3:46 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-20 3:45 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/15] bpf: Add alloc/xchg/direct_access support for local percpu kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-19 0:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-20 3:47 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-19 1:24 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-08-20 4:04 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2023-08-19 1:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/15] bpf: Add bpf_this_cpu_ptr/bpf_per_cpu_ptr support for allocated percpu obj Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-20 4:16 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/15] selftests/bpf: Update error message in negative linked_list test Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/15] libbpf: Add __percpu macro definition Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/15] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_percpu_obj_{new,drop}() macro in bpf_experimental.h Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/15] selftests/bpf: Add tests for array map with local percpu kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/15] bpf: Mark OBJ_RELEASE argument as MEM_RCU when possible Yonghong Song
2023-08-19 1:44 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-08-20 4:19 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/15] selftests/bpf: Remove unnecessary direct read of local percpu kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/15] selftests/bpf: Add tests for cgrp_local_storage with " Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/15] bpf: Allow bpf_spin_lock and bpf_list_head in allocated percpu data structure Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/15] selftests/bpf: Add tests for percpu struct with bpf list head Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/15] selftests/bpf: Add some negative tests Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/15] bpf: Mark BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE deprecated Yonghong Song
2023-08-18 15:54 ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-08-18 17:17 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-18 18:26 ` Zvi Effron
2023-08-18 18:58 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230814172830.1363918-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox