public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 04/15] bpf: Add bpf_this_cpu_ptr/bpf_per_cpu_ptr support for allocated percpu obj
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:28:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230814172830.1363918-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814172809.1361446-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

The bpf helpers bpf_this_cpu_ptr() and bpf_per_cpu_ptr() are re-purposed
for allocated percpu objects. For an allocated percpu obj,
the reg type is 'PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | MEM_RCU'.

The return type for these two re-purposed helpera is
'PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RCU | MEM_ALLOC'.
The MEM_ALLOC allows that the per-cpu data can be read and written.

Since the memory allocator bpf_mem_alloc() returns
a ptr to a percpu ptr for percpu data, the first argument
of bpf_this_cpu_ptr() and bpf_per_cpu_ptr() is patched
with a dereference before passing to the helper func.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index f70f9ac884d2..e23480db37ec 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -480,6 +480,7 @@ struct bpf_insn_aux_data {
 	bool zext_dst; /* this insn zero extends dst reg */
 	bool storage_get_func_atomic; /* bpf_*_storage_get() with atomic memory alloc */
 	bool is_iter_next; /* bpf_iter_<type>_next() kfunc call */
+	bool percpu_ptr_prog_alloc; /* {this,per}_cpu_ptr() with prog alloc */
 	u8 alu_state; /* used in combination with alu_limit */
 
 	/* below fields are initialized once */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a985fbf18a11..6fc200cb68b6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6221,7 +6221,7 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		}
 
 		if (type_is_alloc(reg->type) && !type_is_non_owning_ref(reg->type) &&
-		    !reg->ref_obj_id) {
+		    !(reg->type & MEM_RCU) && !reg->ref_obj_id) {
 			verbose(env, "verifier internal error: ref_obj_id for allocated object must be non-zero\n");
 			return -EFAULT;
 		}
@@ -7765,6 +7765,7 @@ static const struct bpf_reg_types btf_ptr_types = {
 static const struct bpf_reg_types percpu_btf_ptr_types = {
 	.types = {
 		PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU,
+		PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | MEM_RCU,
 		PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | PTR_TRUSTED,
 	}
 };
@@ -7945,6 +7946,7 @@ static int check_reg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
 			return -EACCES;
 		break;
 	case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU:
+	case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | MEM_RCU:
 	case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | PTR_TRUSTED:
 		/* Handled by helper specific checks */
 		break;
@@ -8287,6 +8289,16 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
 			verbose(env, "Helper has invalid btf_id in R%d\n", regno);
 			return -EACCES;
 		}
+		if (reg->type & MEM_RCU) {
+			const struct btf_type *type = btf_type_by_id(reg->btf, reg->btf_id);
+
+			if (!type || !btf_type_is_struct(type)) {
+				verbose(env, "Helper has invalid btf/btf_id in R%d\n", regno);
+				return -EFAULT;
+			}
+			env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].percpu_ptr_prog_alloc = true;
+		}
+
 		meta->ret_btf = reg->btf;
 		meta->ret_btf_id = reg->btf_id;
 		break;
@@ -9888,14 +9900,18 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
 			regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MEM | ret_flag;
 			regs[BPF_REG_0].mem_size = tsize;
 		} else {
-			/* MEM_RDONLY may be carried from ret_flag, but it
-			 * doesn't apply on PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Fold it, otherwise
-			 * it will confuse the check of PTR_TO_BTF_ID in
-			 * check_mem_access().
-			 */
-			ret_flag &= ~MEM_RDONLY;
+			if (env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].percpu_ptr_prog_alloc) {
+				regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | MEM_RCU;
+			} else {
+				/* MEM_RDONLY may be carried from ret_flag, but it
+				 * doesn't apply on PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Fold it, otherwise
+				 * it will confuse the check of PTR_TO_BTF_ID in
+				 * check_mem_access().
+				 */
+				ret_flag &= ~MEM_RDONLY;
+				regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | ret_flag;
+			}
 
-			regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | ret_flag;
 			regs[BPF_REG_0].btf = meta.ret_btf;
 			regs[BPF_REG_0].btf_id = meta.ret_btf_id;
 		}
@@ -18646,6 +18662,25 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			goto patch_call_imm;
 		}
 
+		/* bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr() */
+		if (env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].percpu_ptr_prog_alloc) {
+			/* patch with 'r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0)' since for percpu data,
+			 * bpf_mem_alloc() returns a ptr to the percpu data ptr.
+			 */
+			insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, 0);
+			insn_buf[1] = *insn;
+			cnt = 2;
+
+			new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
+			if (!new_prog)
+				return -ENOMEM;
+
+			delta += cnt - 1;
+			env->prog = prog = new_prog;
+			insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta;
+			goto patch_call_imm;
+		}
+
 		/* BPF_EMIT_CALL() assumptions in some of the map_gen_lookup
 		 * and other inlining handlers are currently limited to 64 bit
 		 * only.
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-14 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-14 17:28 [PATCH bpf-next 00/15] Add support for local percpu kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/15] bpf: Add support for non-fix-size percpu mem allocation Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/15] bpf: Add BPF_KPTR_PERCPU_REF as a field type Yonghong Song
2023-08-18 18:37   ` David Marchevsky
2023-08-18 23:24     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-20  3:46       ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-20  3:45     ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/15] bpf: Add alloc/xchg/direct_access support for local percpu kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-19  0:29   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-20  3:47     ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-19  1:24   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-08-20  4:04     ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2023-08-19  1:01   ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/15] bpf: Add bpf_this_cpu_ptr/bpf_per_cpu_ptr support for allocated percpu obj Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-20  4:16     ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/15] selftests/bpf: Update error message in negative linked_list test Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/15] libbpf: Add __percpu macro definition Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/15] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_percpu_obj_{new,drop}() macro in bpf_experimental.h Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/15] selftests/bpf: Add tests for array map with local percpu kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/15] bpf: Mark OBJ_RELEASE argument as MEM_RCU when possible Yonghong Song
2023-08-19  1:44   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-08-20  4:19     ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/15] selftests/bpf: Remove unnecessary direct read of local percpu kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/15] selftests/bpf: Add tests for cgrp_local_storage with " Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/15] bpf: Allow bpf_spin_lock and bpf_list_head in allocated percpu data structure Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/15] selftests/bpf: Add tests for percpu struct with bpf list head Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/15] selftests/bpf: Add some negative tests Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/15] bpf: Mark BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE deprecated Yonghong Song
2023-08-18 15:54   ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-08-18 17:17     ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-18 18:26   ` Zvi Effron
2023-08-18 18:58     ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230814172830.1363918-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox