From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 12/15] bpf: Allow bpf_spin_lock and bpf_list_head in allocated percpu data structure
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:29:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230814172912.1367692-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814172809.1361446-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Currently, bpf_percpu_obj_new() only allows scalar struct. A scalar struct contains
scalar member or a struct with scalar member up to 3 nested struct levels.
For example, below is a linked list in the per cpu object:
struct val_t {
long b, c, d;
struct bpf_list_head head __contains(foo, node);
struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
};
struct map_val_t {
...
struct val_t __percpu *pc;
...
};
This patch added verifier support for the above percpu struct
with bpf_spin_lock and bpf_list_head. The change is mostly to
add MEM_RCU to various type checking places since the eventual
per cpu object is marked as MEM_RCU, which is used as the input
to various helpers/kfuncs like bpf_spin_lock(), bpf_spin_unlock()
and bpf_list_push_back(), etc.
Another possible use case is bpf_rb_root where a rb tree is
in a percpu struct. The support can be added similarly in
the future if needed.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 6fa458e13bfc..4c3045c8d25f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7848,6 +7848,8 @@ static int check_reg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
type &= ~MEM_ALLOC;
type &= ~MEM_PERCPU;
}
+ if (meta->func_id == BPF_FUNC_spin_lock || meta->func_id == BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock)
+ type &= ~MEM_RCU;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(compatible->types); i++) {
expected = compatible->types[i];
@@ -7929,6 +7931,7 @@ static int check_reg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
}
break;
}
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | MEM_RCU:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC:
if (meta->func_id != BPF_FUNC_spin_lock && meta->func_id != BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock &&
meta->func_id != BPF_FUNC_kptr_xchg) {
@@ -8040,6 +8043,7 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU:
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | MEM_RCU:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF:
/* When referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is passed to release function,
* its fixed offset must be 0. In the other cases, fixed offset
@@ -10604,8 +10608,8 @@ static int ref_convert_owning_non_owning(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 ref_o
* active_lock.ptr = Register's type specific pointer
* active_lock.id = A unique ID for each register pointer value
*
- * Currently, PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE and PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC are the two
- * supported register types.
+ * Currently, PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC and
+ * PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | MEM_RCU are the three supported register types.
*
* The active_lock.ptr in case of map values is the reg->map_ptr, and in case of
* allocated objects is the reg->btf pointer.
@@ -10640,6 +10644,7 @@ static int check_reg_allocation_locked(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_
ptr = reg->map_ptr;
break;
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC:
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | MEM_RCU:
ptr = reg->btf;
break;
default:
@@ -11140,7 +11145,8 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
break;
case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_LIST_HEAD:
if (reg->type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE &&
- reg->type != (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC)) {
+ reg->type != (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC) &&
+ reg->type != (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | MEM_RCU)) {
verbose(env, "arg#%d expected pointer to map value or allocated object\n", i);
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-14 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-14 17:28 [PATCH bpf-next 00/15] Add support for local percpu kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/15] bpf: Add support for non-fix-size percpu mem allocation Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/15] bpf: Add BPF_KPTR_PERCPU_REF as a field type Yonghong Song
2023-08-18 18:37 ` David Marchevsky
2023-08-18 23:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-20 3:46 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-20 3:45 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/15] bpf: Add alloc/xchg/direct_access support for local percpu kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-19 0:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-20 3:47 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-19 1:24 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-08-20 4:04 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/15] bpf: Add bpf_this_cpu_ptr/bpf_per_cpu_ptr support for allocated percpu obj Yonghong Song
2023-08-19 1:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-20 4:16 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/15] selftests/bpf: Update error message in negative linked_list test Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/15] libbpf: Add __percpu macro definition Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/15] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_percpu_obj_{new,drop}() macro in bpf_experimental.h Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/15] selftests/bpf: Add tests for array map with local percpu kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/15] bpf: Mark OBJ_RELEASE argument as MEM_RCU when possible Yonghong Song
2023-08-19 1:44 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-08-20 4:19 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/15] selftests/bpf: Remove unnecessary direct read of local percpu kptr Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/15] selftests/bpf: Add tests for cgrp_local_storage with " Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/15] selftests/bpf: Add tests for percpu struct with bpf list head Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/15] selftests/bpf: Add some negative tests Yonghong Song
2023-08-14 17:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/15] bpf: Mark BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE deprecated Yonghong Song
2023-08-18 15:54 ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-08-18 17:17 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-18 18:26 ` Zvi Effron
2023-08-18 18:58 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230814172912.1367692-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox