From: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com
Cc: song@kernel.org, hffilwlqm@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 23:12:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230818151216.7686-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230818151216.7686-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
From commit ebf7d1f508a73871 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall
handling in JIT"), the tailcall on x64 works better than before.
From commit e411901c0b775a3a ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms
for x64 JIT"), tailcall is able to run in BPF subprograms on x64.
From commit 5b92a28aae4dd0f8 ("bpf: Support attaching tracing BPF program
to other BPF programs"), BPF program is able to trace other BPF programs.
How about combining them all together?
1. FENTRY/FEXIT on a BPF subprogram.
2. A tailcall runs in the BPF subprogram.
3. The tailcall calls itself.
As a result, a tailcall infinite loop comes up. And the loop would halt
the machine.
As we know, in tail call context, the tail_call_cnt propagates by stack
and RAX register between BPF subprograms. So do it in trampolines.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
include/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++
kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 4 ++--
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index a5930042139d3..1ad17d7de5eee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -303,8 +303,12 @@ static void emit_prologue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth, bool ebpf_from_cbpf,
prog += X86_PATCH_SIZE;
if (!ebpf_from_cbpf) {
if (tail_call_reachable && !is_subprog)
+ /* When it's the entry of the whole tailcall context,
+ * zeroing rax means initialising tail_call_cnt.
+ */
EMIT2(0x31, 0xC0); /* xor eax, eax */
else
+ // Keep the same instruction layout.
EMIT2(0x66, 0x90); /* nop2 */
}
EMIT1(0x55); /* push rbp */
@@ -1018,6 +1022,10 @@ static void emit_shiftx(u8 **pprog, u32 dst_reg, u8 src_reg, bool is64, u8 op)
#define INSN_SZ_DIFF (((addrs[i] - addrs[i - 1]) - (prog - temp)))
+/* mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - rounded_stack_depth - 8] */
+#define RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack) \
+ EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x8B, 0x85, -round_up(stack, 8) - 8)
+
static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image,
int oldproglen, struct jit_context *ctx, bool jmp_padding)
{
@@ -1623,9 +1631,7 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32;
if (tail_call_reachable) {
- /* mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - rounded_stack_depth - 8] */
- EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x8B, 0x85,
- -round_up(bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth, 8) - 8);
+ RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth);
if (!imm32)
return -EINVAL;
offs = 7 + x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(&prog, func);
@@ -2298,7 +2304,9 @@ static int invoke_bpf_mod_ret(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
* push rbp
* mov rbp, rsp
* sub rsp, 16 // space for skb and dev
- * push rbx // temp regs to pass start time
+ * mov qword ptr [rbp - 40], rbx // temp regs to pass start time
+ * mov rax, 2 // cache number of argument to rax
+ * mov qword ptr [rbp - 32], rax // save number of argument to stack
* mov qword ptr [rbp - 16], rdi // save skb pointer to stack
* mov qword ptr [rbp - 8], rsi // save dev pointer to stack
* call __bpf_prog_enter // rcu_read_lock and preempt_disable
@@ -2323,7 +2331,9 @@ static int invoke_bpf_mod_ret(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
* push rbp
* mov rbp, rsp
* sub rsp, 24 // space for skb, dev, return value
- * push rbx // temp regs to pass start time
+ * mov qword ptr [rbp - 40], rbx // temp regs to pass start time
+ * mov rax, 2 // cache number of argument to rax
+ * mov qword ptr [rbp - 32], rax // save number of argument to stack
* mov qword ptr [rbp - 24], rdi // save skb pointer to stack
* mov qword ptr [rbp - 16], rsi // save dev pointer to stack
* call __bpf_prog_enter // rcu_read_lock and preempt_disable
@@ -2400,6 +2410,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
* [ ... ]
* [ stack_arg2 ]
* RBP - arg_stack_off [ stack_arg1 ]
+ * RSP [ tail_call_cnt ] BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX
*/
/* room for return value of orig_call or fentry prog */
@@ -2464,6 +2475,8 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
else
/* sub rsp, stack_size */
EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xEC, stack_size);
+ if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX)
+ EMIT1(0x50); /* push rax */
/* mov QWORD PTR [rbp - rbx_off], rbx */
emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_6, -rbx_off);
@@ -2516,9 +2529,15 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
restore_regs(m, &prog, regs_off);
save_args(m, &prog, arg_stack_off, true);
+ if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX)
+ /* Before calling the original function, restore the
+ * tail_call_cnt from stack to rax.
+ */
+ RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack_size);
+
if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK) {
- emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, 8);
- EMIT2(0xff, 0xd0); /* call *rax */
+ emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_FP, 8);
+ EMIT2(0xff, 0xd3); /* call *rbx */ // FIXME: Confirm 0xd3?
} else {
/* call original function */
if (emit_rsb_call(&prog, orig_call, prog)) {
@@ -2569,7 +2588,12 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
ret = -EINVAL;
goto cleanup;
}
- }
+ } else if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX)
+ /* Before running the original function, restore the
+ * tail_call_cnt from stack to rax.
+ */
+ RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack_size);
+
/* restore return value of orig_call or fentry prog back into RAX */
if (save_ret)
emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, -8);
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index cfabbcf47bdb8..c8df257ea435d 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1028,6 +1028,11 @@ struct btf_func_model {
*/
#define BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY BIT(6)
+/* Indicate that current trampoline is in a tail call context. Then, it has to
+ * cache and restore tail_call_cnt to avoid infinite tail call loop.
+ */
+#define BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX BIT(7)
+
/* Each call __bpf_prog_enter + call bpf_func + call __bpf_prog_exit is ~50
* bytes on x86.
*/
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index 78acf28d48732..16ab5da7161f2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -415,8 +415,8 @@ static int bpf_trampoline_update(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, bool lock_direct_mut
goto out;
}
- /* clear all bits except SHARE_IPMODIFY */
- tr->flags &= BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY;
+ /* clear all bits except SHARE_IPMODIFY and TAIL_CALL_CTX */
+ tr->flags &= (BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY | BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX);
if (tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT].nr_links ||
tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN].nr_links) {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 4ccca1f6c9981..52ba9b043f16e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -19246,6 +19246,21 @@ static int check_non_sleepable_error_inject(u32 btf_id)
return btf_id_set_contains(&btf_non_sleepable_error_inject, btf_id);
}
+static inline int find_subprog_index(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
+ u32 btf_id)
+{
+ struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = prog->aux;
+ int i, subprog = -1;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < aux->func_info_cnt; i++)
+ if (aux->func_info[i].type_id == btf_id) {
+ subprog = i;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return subprog;
+}
+
int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
const struct bpf_prog *prog,
const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog,
@@ -19254,9 +19269,9 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
{
bool prog_extension = prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT;
const char prefix[] = "btf_trace_";
- int ret = 0, subprog = -1, i;
const struct btf_type *t;
bool conservative = true;
+ int ret = 0, subprog;
const char *tname;
struct btf *btf;
long addr = 0;
@@ -19291,11 +19306,7 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
return -EINVAL;
}
- for (i = 0; i < aux->func_info_cnt; i++)
- if (aux->func_info[i].type_id == btf_id) {
- subprog = i;
- break;
- }
+ subprog = find_subprog_index(tgt_prog, btf_id);
if (subprog == -1) {
bpf_log(log, "Subprog %s doesn't exist\n", tname);
return -EINVAL;
@@ -19559,7 +19570,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
struct bpf_attach_target_info tgt_info = {};
u32 btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
struct bpf_trampoline *tr;
- int ret;
+ int ret, subprog;
u64 key;
if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL) {
@@ -19629,6 +19640,12 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (!tr)
return -ENOMEM;
+ if (tgt_prog && tgt_prog->aux->tail_call_reachable) {
+ subprog = find_subprog_index(tgt_prog, btf_id);
+ tr->flags = subprog > 0 && tgt_prog->aux->func[subprog]->is_func ?
+ BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX : 0;
+ }
+
prog->aux->dst_trampoline = tr;
return 0;
}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-18 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 15:12 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop Leon Hwang
2023-08-18 15:12 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2023-08-18 15:25 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] " Leon Hwang
2023-08-21 22:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-22 3:17 ` Leon Hwang
2023-08-22 21:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-23 1:49 ` Leon Hwang
2023-08-18 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add testcases for tailcall infinite loop fixing Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230818151216.7686-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com \
--to=hffilwlqm@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox