public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/2] bpf: Fix check_func_arg_reg_off bug for graph root/node
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 23:21:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822175140.1317749-2-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230822175140.1317749-1-memxor@gmail.com>

The commit being fixed introduced a hunk into check_func_arg_reg_off
that bypasses reg->off == 0 enforcement when offset points to a graph
node or root. This might possibly be done for treating bpf_rbtree_remove
and others as KF_RELEASE and then later check correct reg->off in helper
argument checks.

But this is not the case, those helpers are already not KF_RELEASE and
permit non-zero reg->off and verify it later to match the subobject in
BTF type.

However, this logic leads to bpf_obj_drop permitting free of register
arguments with non-zero offset when they point to a graph root or node
within them, which is not ok.

For instance:

struct foo {
	int i;
	int j;
	struct bpf_rb_node node;
};

struct foo *f = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*f));
if (!f) ...
bpf_obj_drop(f); // OK
bpf_obj_drop(&f->i); // still ok from verifier PoV
bpf_obj_drop(&f->node); // Not OK, but permitted right now

Fix this by dropping the whole part of code altogether.

Fixes: 6a3cd3318ff6 ("bpf: Migrate release_on_unlock logic to non-owning ref semantics")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 -----------
 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 3a91bfd7b9cc..3d51c737a034 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7973,17 +7973,6 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		if (arg_type_is_dynptr(arg_type) && type == PTR_TO_STACK)
 			return 0;
 
-		if ((type_is_ptr_alloc_obj(type) || type_is_non_owning_ref(type)) && reg->off) {
-			if (reg_find_field_offset(reg, reg->off, BPF_GRAPH_NODE_OR_ROOT))
-				return __check_ptr_off_reg(env, reg, regno, true);
-
-			verbose(env, "R%d must have zero offset when passed to release func\n",
-				regno);
-			verbose(env, "No graph node or root found at R%d type:%s off:%d\n", regno,
-				btf_type_name(reg->btf, reg->btf_id), reg->off);
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-
 		/* Doing check_ptr_off_reg check for the offset will catch this
 		 * because fixed_off_ok is false, but checking here allows us
 		 * to give the user a better error message.
-- 
2.41.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-22 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-22 17:51 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/2] Fix for check_func_arg_reg_off Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-08-22 17:51 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2023-08-22 17:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_obj_drop with bad reg->off Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2023-08-22 20:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/2] Fix for check_func_arg_reg_off patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230822175140.1317749-2-memxor@gmail.com \
    --to=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox