From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@fb.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: cleanup the usage of get/put_task_struct
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 18:26:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230825162611.GA10654@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05c66b19-d083-57df-b1ee-73035613df36@iogearbox.net>
On 08/25, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> Could you rebase this against bpf-next tree so this can run through our BPF
> CI? Right now the CI cannot pick the patch up due to merge conflict [0].
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230822120549.GA22091@redhat.com/
The merge failed because this patch depends on
[PATCH] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: cleanup the usage of next_thread()
in this thread. But please forget.
I've sent the new series. It would be nice if you can test at least 1-5,
the last 6/6 depends on
[PATCH 1/2] introduce __next_thread(), fix next_tid() vs exec() race
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230824143142.GA31222@redhat.com/
which was not merged yet.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-21 15:09 [PATCH] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: cleanup the usage of next_thread() Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-21 17:55 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-08-21 18:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-21 19:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-21 20:24 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-08-21 20:03 ` [PATCH] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: cleanup the usage of get/put_task_struct Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-21 20:32 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-08-21 20:38 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2023-08-22 1:06 ` Yonghong Song
2023-08-22 12:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-22 12:05 ` [PATCH V2] " Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-25 14:28 ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-08-25 16:26 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2023-08-25 12:41 ` [PATCH] bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: cleanup the usage of next_thread() Oleg Nesterov
2023-08-25 13:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2023-08-25 13:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230825162611.GA10654@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kuifeng@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox