From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Subject: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add test for missed counts of perf event link kprobe
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 09:13:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230907071311.254313-8-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230907071311.254313-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Adding test that puts kprobe on bpf_fentry_test1 that calls
bpf_kfunc_common_test kfunc, which has also kprobe on.
The latter won't get triggered due to kprobe recursion check
and kprobe missed counter is incremented.
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 5 ++
.../bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h | 2 +
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/missed.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/missed_kprobe.c | 30 ++++++++++++
4 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/missed.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/missed_kprobe.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index cefc5dd72573..a5e246f7b202 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -138,6 +138,10 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy(struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq *it)
it->cnt = 0;
}
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_common_test(void)
+{
+}
+
struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 {
int a;
};
@@ -343,6 +347,7 @@ BTF_SET8_START(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_new, KF_ITER_NEW)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_common_test)
BTF_SET8_END(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids)
static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_set = {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
index f5c5b1375c24..7c664dd61059 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
@@ -104,4 +104,6 @@ void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail1(struct prog_test_fail1 *p);
void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail2(struct prog_test_fail2 *p);
void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail3(struct prog_test_fail3 *p);
void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail1(void *mem, int len);
+
+void bpf_kfunc_common_test(void) __ksym;
#endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_KFUNC_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/missed.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/missed.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fc674258c81f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/missed.c
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "missed_kprobe.skel.h"
+
+/*
+ * Putting kprobe on bpf_fentry_test1 that calls bpf_kfunc_common_test
+ * kfunc, which has also kprobe on. The latter won't get triggered due
+ * to kprobe recursion check and kprobe missed counter is incremented.
+ */
+static void test_missed_perf_kprobe(void)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+ struct bpf_link_info info = {};
+ struct missed_kprobe *skel;
+ __u32 len = sizeof(info);
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ skel = missed_kprobe__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "missed_kprobe__open_and_load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = missed_kprobe__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "missed_kprobe__attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.trigger);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "test_run");
+
+ err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(bpf_link__fd(skel->links.test2), &info, &len);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_link_get_info_by_fd"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.type, BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, "info.type");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.type, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE, "info.perf_event.type");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.missed, 1, "info.perf_event.kprobe.missed");
+
+cleanup:
+ missed_kprobe__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void serial_test_missed(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("perf_kprobe"))
+ test_missed_perf_kprobe();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/missed_kprobe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/missed_kprobe.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7f9ef701f5de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/missed_kprobe.c
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+/*
+ * No tests in here, just to trigger 'bpf_fentry_test*'
+ * through tracing test_run
+ */
+SEC("fentry/bpf_modify_return_test")
+int BPF_PROG(trigger)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int test1(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ bpf_kfunc_common_test();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("kprobe/bpf_kfunc_common_test")
+int test2(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-07 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-07 7:13 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/9] bpf: Add missed stats for kprobes Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/9] bpf: Count stats for kprobe_multi programs Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 18:09 ` Song Liu
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/9] bpf: Add missed value to kprobe_multi link info Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 18:15 ` Song Liu
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 3/9] bpf: Add missed value to kprobe perf " Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 18:40 ` Song Liu
2023-09-08 11:43 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-09-08 16:49 ` Song Liu
2023-09-10 18:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-09-08 23:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-09-08 23:32 ` Song Liu
2023-09-08 23:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-09-10 18:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 4/9] bpf: Count missed stats in trace_call_bpf Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 18:46 ` Song Liu
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 5/9] bpftool: Display missed count for kprobe_multi link Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 6/9] bpftool: Display missed count for kprobe perf link Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 7:13 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2023-09-07 18:52 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add test for missed counts of perf event link kprobe Song Liu
2023-09-08 23:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-09-10 18:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add test for recursion " Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 18:55 ` Song Liu
2023-09-14 7:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add test for recursion counts of perf event link tracepoint Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 19:00 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230907071311.254313-8-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox