From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<martin.lau@linux.dev>, <kernel-team@meta.com>,
<iii@linux.ibm.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 0/2] s390/bpf: Fix arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 23:02:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230919060258.3237176-1-song@kernel.org> (raw)
While working on trampoline, I found s390's arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline
returns 0 on success, which breaks struct_ops. However, the CI doesn't
catch this issue. Turns out test_progs:bpf_tcp_ca doesn't really test
members of a struct_ops are actually called via the trampolines.
1/2 fixes arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline for s390.
2/2 adds a check to test_progs:bpf_tcp_ca to verify bpf_cubic_acked() is
indeed called by the trampoline. Without 1/2, this check would fail on
s390.
Song Liu (2):
s390/bpf: Let arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline return program size
selftests/bpf: Check bpf_cubic_acked() is called via struct_ops
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 2 ++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_cubic.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-09-19 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 6:02 Song Liu [this message]
2023-09-19 6:02 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] s390/bpf: Let arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline return program size Song Liu
2023-09-19 9:04 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 6:02 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Check bpf_cubic_acked() is called via struct_ops Song Liu
2023-09-19 9:05 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf 0/2] s390/bpf: Fix arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230919060258.3237176-1-song@kernel.org \
--to=song@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox