From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<martin.lau@linux.dev>, <kernel-team@meta.com>,
<iii@linux.ibm.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Check bpf_cubic_acked() is called via struct_ops
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 23:02:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230919060258.3237176-3-song@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919060258.3237176-1-song@kernel.org>
Test bpf_tcp_ca (in test_progs) checks multiple tcp_congestion_ops.
However, there isn't a test that verifies functions in the
tcp_congestion_ops is actually called. Add a check to verify that
bpf_cubic_acked is actually called during the test.
Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 2 ++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_cubic.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index a53c254c6058..4aabeaa525d4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -185,6 +185,8 @@ static void test_cubic(void)
do_test("bpf_cubic", NULL);
+ ASSERT_EQ(cubic_skel->bss->bpf_cubic_acked_called, 1, "pkts_acked called");
+
bpf_link__destroy(link);
bpf_cubic__destroy(cubic_skel);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_cubic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_cubic.c
index d9660e7200e2..c997e3e3d3fb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_cubic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_cubic.c
@@ -490,6 +490,8 @@ static __always_inline void hystart_update(struct sock *sk, __u32 delay)
}
}
+int bpf_cubic_acked_called = 0;
+
void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(bpf_cubic_acked, struct sock *sk,
const struct ack_sample *sample)
{
@@ -497,6 +499,7 @@ void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(bpf_cubic_acked, struct sock *sk,
struct bictcp *ca = inet_csk_ca(sk);
__u32 delay;
+ bpf_cubic_acked_called = 1;
/* Some calls are for duplicates without timetamps */
if (sample->rtt_us < 0)
return;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-19 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 6:02 [PATCH bpf 0/2] s390/bpf: Fix arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline Song Liu
2023-09-19 6:02 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] s390/bpf: Let arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline return program size Song Liu
2023-09-19 9:04 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 6:02 ` Song Liu [this message]
2023-09-19 9:05 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Check bpf_cubic_acked() is called via struct_ops Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 10:10 ` [PATCH bpf 0/2] s390/bpf: Fix arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230919060258.3237176-3-song@kernel.org \
--to=song@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox