From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/10] selftests/bpf: Trim DENYLIST.s390x
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:09:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230919101336.2223655-11-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919101336.2223655-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Enable all selftests, except the 2 that have to do with the userspace
unwinding, and the new exceptions test, in the s390x CI.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x | 25 ----------------------
1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
index ce6f291665cf..1a63996c0304 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x
@@ -1,30 +1,5 @@
# TEMPORARY
# Alphabetical order
-bloom_filter_map # failed to find kernel BTF type ID of '__x64_sys_getpgid': -3 (?)
-bpf_cookie # failed to open_and_load program: -524 (trampoline)
-bpf_loop # attaches to __x64_sys_nanosleep
-cgrp_local_storage # prog_attach unexpected error: -524 (trampoline)
-dynptr/test_dynptr_skb_data
-dynptr/test_skb_readonly
exceptions # JIT does not support calling kfunc bpf_throw (exceptions)
-fexit_sleep # fexit_skel_load fexit skeleton failed (trampoline)
get_stack_raw_tp # user_stack corrupted user stack (no backchain userspace)
-iters/testmod_seq* # s390x doesn't support kfuncs in modules yet
-kprobe_multi_bench_attach # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
-kprobe_multi_test # relies on fentry
-ksyms_btf/weak_ksyms* # test_ksyms_weak__open_and_load unexpected error: -22 (kfunc)
-ksyms_module # test_ksyms_module__open_and_load unexpected error: -9 (?)
-ksyms_module_libbpf # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc)
-ksyms_module_lskel # test_ksyms_module_lskel__open_and_load unexpected error: -9 (?)
-module_attach # skel_attach skeleton attach failed: -524 (trampoline)
-ringbuf # skel_load skeleton load failed (?)
stacktrace_build_id # compare_map_keys stackid_hmap vs. stackmap err -2 errno 2 (?)
-test_lsm # attach unexpected error: -524 (trampoline)
-trace_printk # trace_printk__load unexpected error: -2 (errno 2) (?)
-trace_vprintk # trace_vprintk__open_and_load unexpected error: -9 (?)
-unpriv_bpf_disabled # fentry
-user_ringbuf # failed to find kernel BTF type ID of '__s390x_sys_prctl': -3 (?)
-verif_stats # trace_vprintk__open_and_load unexpected error: -9 (?)
-xdp_bonding # failed to auto-attach program 'trace_on_entry': -524 (trampoline)
-xdp_metadata # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc)
-test_task_under_cgroup # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc)
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-19 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 10:09 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/10] Implement cpuv4 support for s390x Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 10:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/10] bpf: Disable zero-extension for BPF_MEMSX Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-21 12:35 ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-19 10:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/10] selftests/bpf: Unmount the cgroup2 work directory Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 10:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/10] selftests/bpf: Add big-endian support to the ldsx test Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 10:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/10] s390/bpf: Implement BPF_MOV | BPF_X with sign-extension Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 10:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/10] s390/bpf: Implement BPF_MEMSX Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 10:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/10] s390/bpf: Implement unconditional byte swap Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 10:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/10] s390/bpf: Implement unconditional jump with 32-bit offset Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 10:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/10] s390/bpf: Implement signed division Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 10:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/10] selftests/bpf: Enable the cpuv4 tests for s390x Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-09-19 10:09 ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2023-09-21 21:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/10] Implement cpuv4 support " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230919101336.2223655-11-iii@linux.ibm.com \
--to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox