BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Shung-Hsi Yu" <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@google.com>,
	"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Mykola Lysenko" <mykolal@fb.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: precision tracking test for BPF_NEG and BPF_END
Date: Thu,  2 Nov 2023 13:39:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231102053913.12004-4-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231102053913.12004-1-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>

As seen from previous commit that fix backtracking for BPF_ALU | BPF_TO_BE
| BPF_END, both BPF_NEG and BPF_END require special handling. Add tests
written with inline assembly to check that the verifier does not incorrecly
use the src_reg field of BPF_NEG and BPF_END (including bswap added in v4).

Suggested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c       |  2 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_precision.c  | 93 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_precision.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index e3e68c97b40c..e5c61aa6604a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
 #include "verifier_movsx.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_netfilter_ctx.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_netfilter_retcode.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_precision.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_prevent_map_lookup.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_raw_stack.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_raw_tp_writable.skel.h"
@@ -153,6 +154,7 @@ void test_verifier_meta_access(void)          { RUN(verifier_meta_access); }
 void test_verifier_movsx(void)                 { RUN(verifier_movsx); }
 void test_verifier_netfilter_ctx(void)        { RUN(verifier_netfilter_ctx); }
 void test_verifier_netfilter_retcode(void)    { RUN(verifier_netfilter_retcode); }
+void test_verifier_precision(void)            { RUN(verifier_precision); }
 void test_verifier_prevent_map_lookup(void)   { RUN(verifier_prevent_map_lookup); }
 void test_verifier_raw_stack(void)            { RUN(verifier_raw_stack); }
 void test_verifier_raw_tp_writable(void)      { RUN(verifier_raw_tp_writable); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_precision.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_precision.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..193c0f8272d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_precision.c
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (C) 2023 SUSE LLC */
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+SEC("?raw_tp")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 3: (bf) r1 = r10")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 2: (55) if r2 != 0xfffffff8 goto pc+2")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 1: (87) r2 = -r2")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 0: (b7) r2 = 8")
+__naked int bpf_neg(void)
+{
+	asm volatile (
+		"r2 = 8;"
+		"r2 = -r2;"
+		"if r2 != -8 goto 1f;"
+		"r1 = r10;"
+		"r1 += r2;"
+	"1:"
+		"r0 = 0;"
+		"exit;"
+		::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("?raw_tp")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 3: (bf) r1 = r10")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 2: (55) if r2 != 0x0 goto pc+2")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 1: (d4) r2 = le16 r2")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 0: (b7) r2 = 0")
+__naked int bpf_end_to_le(void)
+{
+	asm volatile (
+		"r2 = 0;"
+		"r2 = le16 r2;"
+		"if r2 != 0 goto 1f;"
+		"r1 = r10;"
+		"r1 += r2;"
+	"1:"
+		"r0 = 0;"
+		"exit;"
+		::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+
+SEC("?raw_tp")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 3: (bf) r1 = r10")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 2: (55) if r2 != 0x0 goto pc+2")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 1: (dc) r2 = be16 r2")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 0: (b7) r2 = 0")
+__naked int bpf_end_to_be(void)
+{
+	asm volatile (
+		"r2 = 0;"
+		"r2 = be16 r2;"
+		"if r2 != 0 goto 1f;"
+		"r1 = r10;"
+		"r1 += r2;"
+	"1:"
+		"r0 = 0;"
+		"exit;"
+		::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+#if (defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64) || defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) || \
+	(defined(__TARGET_ARCH_riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 64) || \
+	defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm) || defined(__TARGET_ARCH_s390)) && \
+	__clang_major__ >= 18
+
+SEC("?raw_tp")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 3: (bf) r1 = r10")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 2: (55) if r2 != 0x0 goto pc+2")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 1: (d7) r2 = bswap16 r2")
+__msg("mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 0: (b7) r2 = 0")
+__naked int bpf_end_bswap(void)
+{
+	asm volatile (
+		"r2 = 0;"
+		"r2 = bswap16 r2;"
+		"if r2 != 0 goto 1f;"
+		"r1 = r10;"
+		"r1 += r2;"
+	"1:"
+		"r0 = 0;"
+		"exit;"
+		::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+#endif /* v4 instruction */
-- 
2.42.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-02  5:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-02  5:39 [PATCH bpf v1 0/2] bpf: Fix precision tracking for BPF_ALU | BPF_TO_BE | BPF_END Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-11-02  5:39 ` [PATCH bpf v1 1/2] " Shung-Hsi Yu
2023-11-02  5:39 ` Shung-Hsi Yu [this message]
2023-11-02  6:10 ` [PATCH bpf v1 0/2] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231102053913.12004-4-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
    --to=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox