From: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_refcount_acquire of node obtained via direct ld
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 00:56:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231107085639.3016113-7-davemarchevsky@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231107085639.3016113-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com>
This patch demonstrates that verifier changes earlier in this series
result in bpf_refcount_acquire(mapval->stashed_kptr) passing
verification. The added test additionally validates that stashing a kptr
in mapval and - in a separate BPF program - refcount_acquiring the kptr
without unstashing works as expected at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/local_kptr_stash.c | 33 +++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/local_kptr_stash.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 104 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/local_kptr_stash.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/local_kptr_stash.c
index b25b870f87ba..e6e50a394472 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/local_kptr_stash.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/local_kptr_stash.c
@@ -73,6 +73,37 @@ static void test_local_kptr_stash_unstash(void)
local_kptr_stash__destroy(skel);
}
+static void test_refcount_acquire_without_unstash(void)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts,
+ .data_in = &pkt_v4,
+ .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+ .repeat = 1,
+ );
+ struct local_kptr_stash *skel;
+ int ret;
+
+ skel = local_kptr_stash__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "local_kptr_stash__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.refcount_acquire_without_unstash),
+ &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "refcount_acquire_without_unstash run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(opts.retval, 2, "refcount_acquire_without_unstash retval");
+
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.stash_refcounted_node), &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "stash_refcounted_node run");
+ ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "stash_refcounted_node retval");
+
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.refcount_acquire_without_unstash),
+ &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "refcount_acquire_without_unstash (2) run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(opts.retval, 42, "refcount_acquire_without_unstash (2) retval");
+
+ local_kptr_stash__destroy(skel);
+}
+
static void test_local_kptr_stash_fail(void)
{
RUN_TESTS(local_kptr_stash_fail);
@@ -86,6 +117,8 @@ void test_local_kptr_stash(void)
test_local_kptr_stash_plain();
if (test__start_subtest("local_kptr_stash_unstash"))
test_local_kptr_stash_unstash();
+ if (test__start_subtest("refcount_acquire_without_unstash"))
+ test_refcount_acquire_without_unstash();
if (test__start_subtest("local_kptr_stash_fail"))
test_local_kptr_stash_fail();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_kptr_stash.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_kptr_stash.c
index b567a666d2b8..1769fdff6aea 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_kptr_stash.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/local_kptr_stash.c
@@ -14,6 +14,24 @@ struct node_data {
struct bpf_rb_node node;
};
+struct refcounted_node {
+ long data;
+ struct bpf_rb_node rb_node;
+ struct bpf_refcount refcount;
+};
+
+struct stash {
+ struct bpf_spin_lock l;
+ struct refcounted_node __kptr *stashed;
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, struct stash);
+ __uint(max_entries, 10);
+} refcounted_node_stash SEC(".maps");
+
struct plain_local {
long key;
long data;
@@ -38,6 +56,7 @@ struct map_value {
* Had to do the same w/ bpf_kfunc_call_test_release below
*/
struct node_data *just_here_because_btf_bug;
+struct refcounted_node *just_here_because_btf_bug2;
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
@@ -132,4 +151,56 @@ long stash_test_ref_kfunc(void *ctx)
return 0;
}
+SEC("tc")
+long refcount_acquire_without_unstash(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct refcounted_node *p;
+ struct stash *s;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ s = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&refcounted_node_stash, &ret);
+ if (!s)
+ return 1;
+
+ if (!s->stashed)
+ /* refcount_acquire failure is expected when no refcounted_node
+ * has been stashed before this program executes
+ */
+ return 2;
+
+ p = bpf_refcount_acquire(s->stashed);
+ if (!p)
+ return 3;
+
+ ret = s->stashed ? s->stashed->data : -1;
+ bpf_obj_drop(p);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/* Helper for refcount_acquire_without_unstash test */
+SEC("tc")
+long stash_refcounted_node(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct refcounted_node *p;
+ struct stash *s;
+ int key = 0;
+
+ s = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&refcounted_node_stash, &key);
+ if (!s)
+ return 1;
+
+ p = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*p));
+ if (!p)
+ return 2;
+ p->data = 42;
+
+ p = bpf_kptr_xchg(&s->stashed, p);
+ if (p) {
+ bpf_obj_drop(p);
+ return 3;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-07 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-07 8:56 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/6] Allow bpf_refcount_acquire of mapval obtained via direct LD Dave Marchevsky
2023-11-07 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/6] bpf: Add KF_RCU flag to bpf_refcount_acquire_impl Dave Marchevsky
2023-11-07 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/6] selftests/bpf: Add test passing MAYBE_NULL reg to bpf_refcount_acquire Dave Marchevsky
2023-11-07 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Use bpf_mem_free_rcu when bpf_obj_dropping non-refcounted nodes Dave Marchevsky
2023-11-07 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/6] bpf: Move GRAPH_{ROOT,NODE}_MASK macros into btf_field_type enum Dave Marchevsky
2023-11-07 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/6] bpf: Mark direct ld of stashed bpf_{rb,list}_node as non-owning ref Dave Marchevsky
2023-11-07 8:56 ` Dave Marchevsky [this message]
2023-11-09 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/6] Allow bpf_refcount_acquire of mapval obtained via direct LD patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231107085639.3016113-7-davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--to=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox