[PATCHv3] selftests: bpf: xskxceiver: ksft_print_msg: fix format type error

Anders Roxell
2023-11-09T17:43:32Z

Crossbuilding selftests/bpf for architecture arm64, format specifies
type error show up like.

xskxceiver.c:912:34: error: format specifies type 'int' but the argument
has type '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') [-Werror,-Wformat]
ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%d]\n",
~~
%llu
__func__, pkt->pkt_nb, meta->count);
^~~~~~~~~~~
xskxceiver.c:929:55: error: format specifies type 'unsigned long long' but
the argument has type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Werror,-Wformat]
ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len);
~~~~ ^~~~

Fixing the issues by casting to (unsigned long long) and changing the
specifiers to be %llu from %d and %u, since with u64s it might be %llx
or %lx, depending on architecture.

Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
index 591ca9637b23..b604c570309a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
@@ -908,8 +908,9 @@ static bool is_metadata_correct(struct pkt *pkt, void *buffer, u64 addr)
struct xdp_info *meta = data - sizeof(struct xdp_info);

if (meta->count != pkt->pkt_nb) {
- ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%d]\n",
- __func__, pkt->pkt_nb, meta->count);
+ ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%llu]\n",
+ __func__, pkt->pkt_nb,
+ (unsigned long long)meta->count);
return false;
}

@@ -926,11 +927,13 @@ static bool is_frag_valid(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u64 addr, u32 len, u32 exp

if (addr >= umem->num_frames * umem->frame_size ||
addr + len > umem->num_frames * umem->frame_size) {
- ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len);
+ ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %llx len: %u\n",
+ (unsigned long long)addr, len);
return false;
}
if (!umem->unaligned_mode && addr % umem->frame_size + len > umem->frame_size) {
- ksft_print_msg("Frag crosses frame boundary addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len);
+ ksft_print_msg("Frag crosses frame boundary addr: %llx len: %u\n",
+ (unsigned long long)addr, len);
return false;
}

@@ -1029,7 +1032,8 @@ static int complete_pkts(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, int batch_size)
u64 addr = *xsk_ring_cons__comp_addr(&xsk->umem->cq, idx + rcvd - 1);

ksft_print_msg("[%s] Too many packets completed\n", __func__);
- ksft_print_msg("Last completion address: %llx\n", addr);
+ ksft_print_msg("Last completion address: %llx\n",
+ (unsigned long long)addr);
return TEST_FAILURE;
}

@@ -1513,8 +1517,9 @@ static int validate_tx_invalid_descs(struct ifobject *ifobject)
}

if (stats.tx_invalid_descs != ifobject->xsk->pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2) {
- ksft_print_msg("[%s] tx_invalid_descs incorrect. Got [%u] expected [%u]\n",
- __func__, stats.tx_invalid_descs,
+ ksft_print_msg("[%s] tx_invalid_descs incorrect. Got [%llu] expected [%u]\n",
+ __func__,
+ (unsigned long long)stats.tx_invalid_descs,
ifobject->xsk->pkt_stream->nb_pkts);
return TEST_FAILURE;
}
--
2.42.0