From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
bjorn@kernel.org, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com,
echaudro@redhat.com, lorenzo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/3] net: fix usage of multi-buffer BPF helper for ZC AF_XDP
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2023 01:29:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202312090104.6EOsoGVa-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231208112945.313687-3-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Hi Maciej,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on bpf/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Maciej-Fijalkowski/xsk-recycle-buffer-in-case-Rx-queue-was-full/20231208-193306
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208112945.313687-3-maciej.fijalkowski%40intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH bpf 2/3] net: fix usage of multi-buffer BPF helper for ZC AF_XDP
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-003-20231208 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231209/202312090104.6EOsoGVa-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231209/202312090104.6EOsoGVa-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312090104.6EOsoGVa-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> net/core/filter.c:4102:3: error: call to undeclared function 'xsk_buff_get_tail'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
xsk_buff_get_tail(xdp)->data_end -= shrink;
^
net/core/filter.c:4102:3: note: did you mean 'xsk_buff_get_frag'?
include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h:324:32: note: 'xsk_buff_get_frag' declared here
static inline struct xdp_buff *xsk_buff_get_frag(struct xdp_buff *first)
^
>> net/core/filter.c:4102:27: error: member reference type 'int' is not a pointer
xsk_buff_get_tail(xdp)->data_end -= shrink;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
net/core/filter.c:4115:14: error: call to undeclared function 'xsk_buff_get_tail'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
zc_frag = xsk_buff_get_tail(xdp);
^
>> net/core/filter.c:4115:12: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct xdp_buff *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
zc_frag = xsk_buff_get_tail(xdp);
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:4117:4: error: call to undeclared function 'xsk_buff_tail_del'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
xsk_buff_tail_del(zc_frag);
^
5 errors generated.
vim +/xsk_buff_get_tail +4102 net/core/filter.c
4097
4098 static void __shrink_data(struct xdp_buff *xdp, struct xdp_mem_info *mem_info,
4099 skb_frag_t *frag, int shrink)
4100 {
4101 if (mem_info->type == MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL)
> 4102 xsk_buff_get_tail(xdp)->data_end -= shrink;
4103 skb_frag_size_sub(frag, shrink);
4104 }
4105
4106 static bool shrink_data(struct xdp_buff *xdp, skb_frag_t *frag, int shrink)
4107 {
4108 struct xdp_mem_info *mem_info = &xdp->rxq->mem;
4109
4110 if (skb_frag_size(frag) == shrink) {
4111 struct page *page = skb_frag_page(frag);
4112 struct xdp_buff *zc_frag = NULL;
4113
4114 if (mem_info->type == MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL) {
> 4115 zc_frag = xsk_buff_get_tail(xdp);
4116 xdp_buff_clear_frags_flag(zc_frag);
> 4117 xsk_buff_tail_del(zc_frag);
4118 }
4119
4120 __xdp_return(page_address(page), mem_info, false, zc_frag);
4121 return true;
4122 }
4123 __shrink_data(xdp, mem_info, frag, shrink);
4124 return false;
4125 }
4126
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-08 11:29 [PATCH bpf 0/3] net: bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() fixes Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-12-08 11:29 ` [PATCH bpf 1/3] xsk: recycle buffer in case Rx queue was full Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-12-08 11:29 ` [PATCH bpf 2/3] net: fix usage of multi-buffer BPF helper for ZC AF_XDP Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-12-08 17:29 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-12-08 17:53 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-08 17:53 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-08 11:29 ` [PATCH bpf 3/3] ice: work on pre-XDP prog frag count Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-12-08 11:53 ` Sokolowski, Jan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202312090104.6EOsoGVa-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox