From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] bpf: Refill only one percpu element in memalloc
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 14:30:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231212223055.2138132-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231212223040.2135547-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Typically for percpu map element or data structure, once allocated,
most operations are lookup or in-place update. Deletion are really
rare. Currently, for percpu data strcture, 4 elements will be
refilled if the size is <= 256. Let us just do with one element
for percpu data. For example, for size 256 and 128 cpus, the
potential saving will be 3 * 256 * 128 * 128 = 12MB.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
index 84987e97fd0a..a1d718ee264d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
@@ -483,11 +483,15 @@ static void init_refill_work(struct bpf_mem_cache *c)
static void prefill_mem_cache(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int cpu)
{
+ int cnt = 1;
+
/* To avoid consuming memory assume that 1st run of bpf
* prog won't be doing more than 4 map_update_elem from
* irq disabled region
*/
- alloc_bulk(c, c->unit_size <= 256 ? 4 : 1, cpu_to_node(cpu), false);
+ if (!c->percpu_size && c->unit_size <= 256)
+ cnt = 4;
+ alloc_bulk(c, cnt, cpu_to_node(cpu), false);
}
static int check_obj_size(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, unsigned int idx)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-12 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 22:30 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: Reduce memory usage for bpf_global_percpu_ma Yonghong Song
2023-12-12 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: Refactor to have a memalloc cache destroying function Yonghong Song
2023-12-13 11:05 ` Hou Tao
2023-12-12 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] bpf: Allow per unit prefill for non-fix-size percpu memory allocator Yonghong Song
2023-12-13 11:03 ` Hou Tao
2023-12-13 17:25 ` Yonghong Song
2023-12-12 22:30 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2023-12-13 11:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] bpf: Refill only one percpu element in memalloc Hou Tao
2023-12-13 17:26 ` Yonghong Song
2023-12-12 22:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] bpf: Limit up to 512 bytes for bpf_global_percpu_ma allocation Yonghong Song
2023-12-13 10:15 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-13 17:20 ` Yonghong Song
2023-12-13 11:09 ` Hou Tao
2023-12-13 17:28 ` Yonghong Song
2023-12-13 14:13 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-12 22:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Cope with 512 bytes limit with bpf_global_percpu_ma Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231212223055.2138132-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox