BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Cope with 512 bytes limit with bpf_global_percpu_ma
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 16:12:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231215001227.3254314-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231215001152.3249146-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

In the previous patch, the maximum data size for bpf_global_percpu_ma
is 512 bytes. This breaks selftest test_bpf_ma. Let us adjust it
accordingly. Also added a selftest to capture the verification failure
when the allocation size is greater than 512.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_fail.c    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_ma.c  |  9 ---------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_fail.c
index 1a891d30f1fe..f2b8eb2ff76f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_fail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_fail.c
@@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ struct val_with_rb_root_t {
 	struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
 };
 
+struct val_600b_t {
+	char b[600];
+};
+
 struct elem {
 	long sum;
 	struct val_t __percpu_kptr *pc;
@@ -161,4 +165,18 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_array_map_7)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+SEC("?fentry.s/bpf_fentry_test1")
+__failure __msg("bpf_percpu_obj_new type size (600) is greater than 512")
+int BPF_PROG(test_array_map_8)
+{
+	struct val_600b_t __percpu_kptr *p;
+
+	p = bpf_percpu_obj_new(struct val_600b_t);
+	if (!p)
+		return 0;
+
+	bpf_percpu_obj_drop(p);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_ma.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_ma.c
index b685a4aba6bd..68cba55eb828 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_ma.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_ma.c
@@ -188,9 +188,6 @@ DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(128);
 DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(192);
 DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(256);
 DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(512);
-DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(1024);
-DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(2048);
-DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(4096);
 
 SEC("?fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_nanosleep")
 int test_batch_alloc_free(void *ctx)
@@ -259,9 +256,6 @@ int test_batch_percpu_alloc_free(void *ctx)
 	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(192, 128, 6);
 	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(256, 128, 7);
 	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(512, 64, 8);
-	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(1024, 32, 9);
-	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(2048, 16, 10);
-	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(4096, 8, 11);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -283,9 +277,6 @@ int test_percpu_free_through_map_free(void *ctx)
 	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(192, 128, 6);
 	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(256, 128, 7);
 	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(512, 64, 8);
-	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(1024, 32, 9);
-	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(2048, 16, 10);
-	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(4096, 8, 11);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-15  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-15  0:11 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf: Reduce memory usage for bpf_global_percpu_ma Yonghong Song
2023-12-15  0:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] bpf: Refactor to have a memalloc cache destroying function Yonghong Song
2023-12-15  0:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/6] bpf: Avoid unnecessary extra percpu memory allocation Yonghong Song
2023-12-15  3:40   ` Hou Tao
2023-12-15  0:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] bpf: Allow per unit prefill for non-fix-size percpu memory allocator Yonghong Song
2023-12-15  2:45   ` Yonghong Song
2023-12-15  3:19   ` Hou Tao
2023-12-15  6:50     ` Yonghong Song
2023-12-15  7:27       ` Yonghong Song
2023-12-15  7:40         ` Hou Tao
2023-12-15 14:20           ` Yonghong Song
2023-12-15  0:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] bpf: Refill only one percpu element in memalloc Yonghong Song
2023-12-15  0:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] bpf: Limit up to 512 bytes for bpf_global_percpu_ma allocation Yonghong Song
2023-12-15  0:12 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2023-12-15  3:33   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Cope with 512 bytes limit with bpf_global_percpu_ma Hou Tao
2023-12-15  7:38     ` Yonghong Song
2023-12-15  7:51       ` Hou Tao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231215001227.3254314-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox